You are here: Home » Politics » News » National
Business Standard

Bofors scam: Government wants CBI to re-open in the case

The Delhi High Court's 2005 order had ruled in favour of quashing proceedings in the case

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

CBI
(Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons)

A majority of the members of a parliamentary committee on Wednesday asked the to move the against the Delhi High Court's 2005 order quashing proceedings in the case, two MPs on the panel said.

Director Alok Verma faced questions from the members of the sub-committee on defence attached to the Public Accounts Committee on why the premier investigating agency did not approach the apex court after the Delhi dismissed proceedings in the case in 2005.

The six-member on defence is looking into non-compliance of certain aspects of the report of 1986 on the Bofors howitzer gun deal.

Verma and Defence Secretary Sanjay Mitra were among the officials who appeared before the panel headed by BJD MP Bhartruhari Mahtab.

During the meeting, several members including Mahtab and BJP MP Nishikant Dubey said that the should "reopen" the case and file a fresh plea in the apex court, the two members who were present at the meeting said on condition of anonymity.

Both the MPs are from different political parties.

The scandal relating to alleged payment of kickbacks in the procurement of howitzer artillery guns had triggered a massive political storm and led to the fall of the Rajiv Gandhi government in 1989.

The wanted to approach the in 2005 after the Delhi quashed the case but it was denied permission by the then UPA government, Dubey said.

In his remarks at the meeting, Mahtab said the sub- committee wanted to pursue the matter with "full vigour" as there were "systemic failures" in the contract signed with Bofors, said one of the two members.

"The case is a clear example of systemic failure and reflection of criminality. Therefore, the panel feels that must seek permission from the government to reopen the case by filing a plea in Supreme Court," Dubey and Mahtab told the meeting.

In a note submitted to the panel, the defence ministry said that after the Delhi quashed the case in May 2005, the had approached the government for permission to contest the order in the which was denied.

Later, an advocate Ajay Kumar Agrawal moved the apex court challenging the High Court's order.

The report on is the oldest "pending" report before the PAC. The main function of the PAC is to examine the audit report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India after it has been laid in

(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU