You are here: Home » Politics » News » National
Business Standard

Civic polls: Madras HC admits Tamil Nadu Election Commission's appeal

The HC had on Oct 4 declared the notification for civic polls in the state, scheduled for Oct 17 and 19, as null and void

Press Trust of India  |  Chennai 

Madras High Court

The Madras High Court on Tuesday admitted an appeal filed by State Commission (SEC) against the order of a single judge who set aside the notification for the local body elections in Tamil Nadu.

A division bench also ordered issue of notices to the state Government and on the matter returnable by four weeks.

The High Court had on October four declared the notification for in the state, scheduled for October 17 and 19, as null and void, holding that it violated the Panchayat Rules.

It also directed authorities to issue a fresh notification for holding the and complete the process by December 31, on a petition by DMK.

In his petition, leader and Rajya Sabha member RS Barathy had contended that rules were not followed and mandatory reservation for Scheduled Tribes was not provided in the civic posts.

Challenging the Single Judge's order the SEC filed an appeal.

In its appeal, the Commission submitted that the order setting aside the September 26th notification issued for had resulted in grave miscarriage of justice.

It was also submitted that the Single Judge had failed to see that once notification is published, the entire state machinery can be requisitioned by the Commission for election-related work.

"Therefore, it is not desirable to prolong the period as it may result in administrative inconvenience. The observation of the judge that the SEC had acted with unwarranted hurry is not justified in the facts of the case", the SEC submitted.

Elections have to be held within a stipulated time as it was imperative that new body must take office by the end of October 2016. The judge also erred in stating that the ruling party had advance information regarding the polls.

The observation may not be justified in the facts of this case, it was submitted.

The SEC argued that the judge failed to see that the so-called contravention of Rule 24/25 of the Panchayat Rules may not amount to illegalities. Also, at the best, it can only be an irregularity which will not justify stopping of after the notification had been issued.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Civic polls: Madras HC admits Tamil Nadu Election Commission's appeal

The HC had on Oct 4 declared the notification for civic polls in the state, scheduled for Oct 17 and 19, as null and void

The HC had on Oct 4 declared the notification for civic polls in the state, scheduled for Oct 17 and 19, as null and void
The Madras High Court on Tuesday admitted an appeal filed by State Commission (SEC) against the order of a single judge who set aside the notification for the local body elections in Tamil Nadu.

A division bench also ordered issue of notices to the state Government and on the matter returnable by four weeks.

The High Court had on October four declared the notification for in the state, scheduled for October 17 and 19, as null and void, holding that it violated the Panchayat Rules.

It also directed authorities to issue a fresh notification for holding the and complete the process by December 31, on a petition by DMK.

In his petition, leader and Rajya Sabha member RS Barathy had contended that rules were not followed and mandatory reservation for Scheduled Tribes was not provided in the civic posts.

Challenging the Single Judge's order the SEC filed an appeal.

In its appeal, the Commission submitted that the order setting aside the September 26th notification issued for had resulted in grave miscarriage of justice.

It was also submitted that the Single Judge had failed to see that once notification is published, the entire state machinery can be requisitioned by the Commission for election-related work.

"Therefore, it is not desirable to prolong the period as it may result in administrative inconvenience. The observation of the judge that the SEC had acted with unwarranted hurry is not justified in the facts of the case", the SEC submitted.

Elections have to be held within a stipulated time as it was imperative that new body must take office by the end of October 2016. The judge also erred in stating that the ruling party had advance information regarding the polls.

The observation may not be justified in the facts of this case, it was submitted.

The SEC argued that the judge failed to see that the so-called contravention of Rule 24/25 of the Panchayat Rules may not amount to illegalities. Also, at the best, it can only be an irregularity which will not justify stopping of after the notification had been issued.
image
Business Standard
177 22

Civic polls: Madras HC admits Tamil Nadu Election Commission's appeal

The HC had on Oct 4 declared the notification for civic polls in the state, scheduled for Oct 17 and 19, as null and void

The Madras High Court on Tuesday admitted an appeal filed by State Commission (SEC) against the order of a single judge who set aside the notification for the local body elections in Tamil Nadu.

A division bench also ordered issue of notices to the state Government and on the matter returnable by four weeks.

The High Court had on October four declared the notification for in the state, scheduled for October 17 and 19, as null and void, holding that it violated the Panchayat Rules.

It also directed authorities to issue a fresh notification for holding the and complete the process by December 31, on a petition by DMK.

In his petition, leader and Rajya Sabha member RS Barathy had contended that rules were not followed and mandatory reservation for Scheduled Tribes was not provided in the civic posts.

Challenging the Single Judge's order the SEC filed an appeal.

In its appeal, the Commission submitted that the order setting aside the September 26th notification issued for had resulted in grave miscarriage of justice.

It was also submitted that the Single Judge had failed to see that once notification is published, the entire state machinery can be requisitioned by the Commission for election-related work.

"Therefore, it is not desirable to prolong the period as it may result in administrative inconvenience. The observation of the judge that the SEC had acted with unwarranted hurry is not justified in the facts of the case", the SEC submitted.

Elections have to be held within a stipulated time as it was imperative that new body must take office by the end of October 2016. The judge also erred in stating that the ruling party had advance information regarding the polls.

The observation may not be justified in the facts of this case, it was submitted.

The SEC argued that the judge failed to see that the so-called contravention of Rule 24/25 of the Panchayat Rules may not amount to illegalities. Also, at the best, it can only be an irregularity which will not justify stopping of after the notification had been issued.

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard