You are here: Home » Politics » News » National
Business Standard

Passage of tax law amid din provides fresh ammo to Opposition

Parties will meet on Wednesday morning to decide if the passage of the Bill violated parliamentary procedures and should be taken to President

Amit Agnihotri  |  New Delhi 

A view of the Parliament House in New Delhi. (Photo: PTI)
A view of the Parliament House in New Delhi. (Photo: PTI)

The passage of the Taxation Laws (2nd Amendment) Bill, 2016 in the Lok Sabha amid din on Tuesday gave a divided Opposition another chance to close ranks against demonetisation. A day after chinks appeared in the Opposition-sponsored nationwide protests against banning of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes, with Janata Dal (United) and the choosing to stay away, these parties will meet on Wednesday morning to decide if the passage of the Bill violated parliamentary procedures and should be taken to President Pranab Mukherjee. 
 
“This is like trampling upon the Constitution,” said spokesperson Randeep Surjewala. 
 
member in the lower house Sushmita Dev said the Opposition parties would have a strategy session on Wednesday before convenes to decide on taking their complaint over the way the government pushed the tax amendment Bill in the house. 

“The government rushed through the Bill. What was the great hurry to pass a law, which affects the whole tax structure of the country?” she asked. “Under Constitution Article 117 and Parliamentary Rules and Procedure, the President must give his assent before an amendment is considered in the House but that was surpassed.” 

Two amendments by Revolutionary Socialist Part member and Bhartruhari Mahtab of the BJD were allowed. Premachandran refused to move his amendment saying it did not have the Presidential assent while Mahtab’s amendment was negated by a voice vote. 

The Opposition members said the Bill should not be discussed before the House debated demonetisation. However, Speaker Sumitra Mahajan said the Bill was of urgent public importance, and had to be passed immediately. 

Saugat Roy said the Opposition did not get a chance to oppose introduction of the Bill on Monday because it was done stealthily. Parliamentary affairs minister Ananth Kumar countered the Opposition’s charge saying amendments to some of the clauses did not require the President’s nod. 

“All the formalities were completed,” he said. 

Ananth Kumar made a fresh appeal to the opposition parties to debate demonetisation while assuring them that PM Modi will intervene.
The affairs minister defended the passage of the Taxation Laws (2nd Amendment) Bill, 2016 amid din saying the government wanted to curb black money and use the collections for the benefit of the poor at the earliest. 

Amid slogan shouting by the Opposition in the lower house, finance minister Arun Jaitley said the Bill would give means to the government to run schemes such as Garib Kalyan Kosh. 

Rejecting government’s arguments, Surjewala said that Modi was actually helping black money hoarders through demonetisation and the fresh amnesty scheme, which converts unaccounted money into legal tender after payment of 50% income tax. 

“He is 50:50 PM,” said Surjewala. 

Noting that under Section 271-I-C (iii) of the Income Tax Act, if anybody with black-money had been caught post-demonetisation he or she would be liable to pay 132% tax, the leader said there was no rationale to launch a fresh voluntary income disclosure scheme. 

Cong questions formation of 5-member panel on demonetisation

The questioned the government’s plans to set up a committee of five chief ministers to look into the demonetisation issue even as its constitution remained a sticking point for the government managers. “It is surprising that the government is thinking of it after 21 days of demonetisation which has brought misery for millions of people. It proves out point that the government is dealing with the note ban issue in an-adhoc manner,” said spokesperson Randeep Surjewala. 

He asked whether the Prime Minister would implement the recommendation of such a panel if it goes against note ban. 

Sources said Bihar CM Nitish Kumar, Puducherry CM V Narayanasamy, Tripura CM Manik Sarkar, Andhra Pradesh CM N Chandrababu Naidu and Madhya Pradesh CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan could be named for the panel but the opposition leaders had not consented so far.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Passage of tax law amid din provides fresh ammo to Opposition

Parties will meet on Wednesday morning to decide if the passage of the Bill violated parliamentary procedures and should be taken to President

Parties will meet on Wednesday morning to decide if the passage of the Bill violated parliamentary procedures and should be taken to President
The passage of the Taxation Laws (2nd Amendment) Bill, 2016 in the Lok Sabha amid din on Tuesday gave a divided Opposition another chance to close ranks against demonetisation. A day after chinks appeared in the Opposition-sponsored nationwide protests against banning of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes, with Janata Dal (United) and the choosing to stay away, these parties will meet on Wednesday morning to decide if the passage of the Bill violated parliamentary procedures and should be taken to President Pranab Mukherjee. 
 
“This is like trampling upon the Constitution,” said spokesperson Randeep Surjewala. 
 
member in the lower house Sushmita Dev said the Opposition parties would have a strategy session on Wednesday before convenes to decide on taking their complaint over the way the government pushed the tax amendment Bill in the house. 

“The government rushed through the Bill. What was the great hurry to pass a law, which affects the whole tax structure of the country?” she asked. “Under Constitution Article 117 and Parliamentary Rules and Procedure, the President must give his assent before an amendment is considered in the House but that was surpassed.” 

Two amendments by Revolutionary Socialist Part member and Bhartruhari Mahtab of the BJD were allowed. Premachandran refused to move his amendment saying it did not have the Presidential assent while Mahtab’s amendment was negated by a voice vote. 

The Opposition members said the Bill should not be discussed before the House debated demonetisation. However, Speaker Sumitra Mahajan said the Bill was of urgent public importance, and had to be passed immediately. 

Saugat Roy said the Opposition did not get a chance to oppose introduction of the Bill on Monday because it was done stealthily. Parliamentary affairs minister Ananth Kumar countered the Opposition’s charge saying amendments to some of the clauses did not require the President’s nod. 

“All the formalities were completed,” he said. 

Ananth Kumar made a fresh appeal to the opposition parties to debate demonetisation while assuring them that PM Modi will intervene.
The affairs minister defended the passage of the Taxation Laws (2nd Amendment) Bill, 2016 amid din saying the government wanted to curb black money and use the collections for the benefit of the poor at the earliest. 

Amid slogan shouting by the Opposition in the lower house, finance minister Arun Jaitley said the Bill would give means to the government to run schemes such as Garib Kalyan Kosh. 

Rejecting government’s arguments, Surjewala said that Modi was actually helping black money hoarders through demonetisation and the fresh amnesty scheme, which converts unaccounted money into legal tender after payment of 50% income tax. 

“He is 50:50 PM,” said Surjewala. 

Noting that under Section 271-I-C (iii) of the Income Tax Act, if anybody with black-money had been caught post-demonetisation he or she would be liable to pay 132% tax, the leader said there was no rationale to launch a fresh voluntary income disclosure scheme. 

Cong questions formation of 5-member panel on demonetisation

The questioned the government’s plans to set up a committee of five chief ministers to look into the demonetisation issue even as its constitution remained a sticking point for the government managers. “It is surprising that the government is thinking of it after 21 days of demonetisation which has brought misery for millions of people. It proves out point that the government is dealing with the note ban issue in an-adhoc manner,” said spokesperson Randeep Surjewala. 

He asked whether the Prime Minister would implement the recommendation of such a panel if it goes against note ban. 

Sources said Bihar CM Nitish Kumar, Puducherry CM V Narayanasamy, Tripura CM Manik Sarkar, Andhra Pradesh CM N Chandrababu Naidu and Madhya Pradesh CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan could be named for the panel but the opposition leaders had not consented so far.
image
Business Standard
177 22

Passage of tax law amid din provides fresh ammo to Opposition

Parties will meet on Wednesday morning to decide if the passage of the Bill violated parliamentary procedures and should be taken to President

The passage of the Taxation Laws (2nd Amendment) Bill, 2016 in the Lok Sabha amid din on Tuesday gave a divided Opposition another chance to close ranks against demonetisation. A day after chinks appeared in the Opposition-sponsored nationwide protests against banning of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes, with Janata Dal (United) and the choosing to stay away, these parties will meet on Wednesday morning to decide if the passage of the Bill violated parliamentary procedures and should be taken to President Pranab Mukherjee. 
 
“This is like trampling upon the Constitution,” said spokesperson Randeep Surjewala. 
 
member in the lower house Sushmita Dev said the Opposition parties would have a strategy session on Wednesday before convenes to decide on taking their complaint over the way the government pushed the tax amendment Bill in the house. 

“The government rushed through the Bill. What was the great hurry to pass a law, which affects the whole tax structure of the country?” she asked. “Under Constitution Article 117 and Parliamentary Rules and Procedure, the President must give his assent before an amendment is considered in the House but that was surpassed.” 

Two amendments by Revolutionary Socialist Part member and Bhartruhari Mahtab of the BJD were allowed. Premachandran refused to move his amendment saying it did not have the Presidential assent while Mahtab’s amendment was negated by a voice vote. 

The Opposition members said the Bill should not be discussed before the House debated demonetisation. However, Speaker Sumitra Mahajan said the Bill was of urgent public importance, and had to be passed immediately. 

Saugat Roy said the Opposition did not get a chance to oppose introduction of the Bill on Monday because it was done stealthily. Parliamentary affairs minister Ananth Kumar countered the Opposition’s charge saying amendments to some of the clauses did not require the President’s nod. 

“All the formalities were completed,” he said. 

Ananth Kumar made a fresh appeal to the opposition parties to debate demonetisation while assuring them that PM Modi will intervene.
The affairs minister defended the passage of the Taxation Laws (2nd Amendment) Bill, 2016 amid din saying the government wanted to curb black money and use the collections for the benefit of the poor at the earliest. 

Amid slogan shouting by the Opposition in the lower house, finance minister Arun Jaitley said the Bill would give means to the government to run schemes such as Garib Kalyan Kosh. 

Rejecting government’s arguments, Surjewala said that Modi was actually helping black money hoarders through demonetisation and the fresh amnesty scheme, which converts unaccounted money into legal tender after payment of 50% income tax. 

“He is 50:50 PM,” said Surjewala. 

Noting that under Section 271-I-C (iii) of the Income Tax Act, if anybody with black-money had been caught post-demonetisation he or she would be liable to pay 132% tax, the leader said there was no rationale to launch a fresh voluntary income disclosure scheme. 

Cong questions formation of 5-member panel on demonetisation

The questioned the government’s plans to set up a committee of five chief ministers to look into the demonetisation issue even as its constitution remained a sticking point for the government managers. “It is surprising that the government is thinking of it after 21 days of demonetisation which has brought misery for millions of people. It proves out point that the government is dealing with the note ban issue in an-adhoc manner,” said spokesperson Randeep Surjewala. 

He asked whether the Prime Minister would implement the recommendation of such a panel if it goes against note ban. 

Sources said Bihar CM Nitish Kumar, Puducherry CM V Narayanasamy, Tripura CM Manik Sarkar, Andhra Pradesh CM N Chandrababu Naidu and Madhya Pradesh CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan could be named for the panel but the opposition leaders had not consented so far.

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard