You are here: Home » Politics » News » National
Business Standard

Step into box if you instructed Jethmalani's remarks: Delhi HC to Kejriwal

Termed Ram Jethmalani's remarks against Arun Jaitley in defamation case as 'scandalous'

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Arvind Kejriwal
Arvind Kejriwal

The High on Wednesday termed as "scandalous" certain remarks made by Kejriwal's lawyer against during his cross examination in a civil suit filed by the Union Minister.

Justice Manmohan said if such remarks were made on instructions of Kejriwal, then he should "first step into the box and make good his allegations" before continuing with Jaitley's cross examination.



"If such allegations have been made on instructions of Defendant 1 (Kejriwal), then no point in continuing with cross examination of plaintiff (Jaitley) any more. Let Defendant 1 make good his allegations. Let him step into the box," the judge orally observed.

Jaitley's senior advocates Rajiv Nayar and Sandeep Sethi had raised the issue before the saying they want a clarification from Kejriwal whether the remarks were made on his instructions or by Jethmalani on his own.

Nayar said if Kejriwal had instructed the senior lawyer to make the adverse remark, then they would seek additional aggravated damages of Rs 10 crore from him.

If on the other hand, Jethmalani had on his own made the remark, then it would be a violation of the Bar Council of India rules, he said.

The said that such manner of cross examination cannot be allowed and something has to be done. It directed Jaitley's lawyers to file an application with regard to the adverse remarks made against him by Jethmalani.

"What is to be done when such scandalous remarks are made. It's unpleasant," Justice Manmohan said and added that "cross (examination) should be carried out in accordance with law".

The said if cross examination is carried out in this manner in rape cases then it would amount to the victim being raped all over again and that too in

Jethmalani had made the remarks yesterday before Joint Registrar Deepali Sharma when Jaitley was being cross-examined in the Rs 10 crore civil case filed by him against Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders for accusing him of financial irregularities in the and District Cricket Association (DDCA) of which he was the President from 2000 to 2013.

Five AAP leaders — Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai — along with Kejriwal are also facing a criminal case filed by Jaitley on the same issue.

The issue cropped up before Justice Manmohan who was hearing an application moved by Chadha for making amendments in his written submission filed in reply to Jaitley's plea.

During the hearing, the judge frowned upon the way the cross examination was carried out saying a person who has filed a case "cannot be further defamed in this manner".

The amendment application was listed before another bench by the on May 26.

Sparks flew during a charged-up hearing yesterday in the high after Jaitley lost his cool when Jethmalani used a scandalous word to describe him.

Jaitley, 64 , was in the for the fourth round of cross-examination by Jethmalani yesterday in his case against the AAP chief but the proceedings ended abruptly after an intense verbal duel broke out between the once close legal associates.

The proceedings had lasted barely 45 minutes.

The joint registrar had yesterday posted the cross examination on July 28 and 31.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Step into box if you instructed Jethmalani's remarks: Delhi HC to Kejriwal

Termed Ram Jethmalani's remarks against Arun Jaitley in defamation case as 'scandalous'

Termed Ram Jethmalani's remarks against Arun Jaitley in defamation case as 'scandalous' The High on Wednesday termed as "scandalous" certain remarks made by Kejriwal's lawyer against during his cross examination in a civil suit filed by the Union Minister.

Justice Manmohan said if such remarks were made on instructions of Kejriwal, then he should "first step into the box and make good his allegations" before continuing with Jaitley's cross examination.

"If such allegations have been made on instructions of Defendant 1 (Kejriwal), then no point in continuing with cross examination of plaintiff (Jaitley) any more. Let Defendant 1 make good his allegations. Let him step into the box," the judge orally observed.

Jaitley's senior advocates Rajiv Nayar and Sandeep Sethi had raised the issue before the saying they want a clarification from Kejriwal whether the remarks were made on his instructions or by Jethmalani on his own.

Nayar said if Kejriwal had instructed the senior lawyer to make the adverse remark, then they would seek additional aggravated damages of Rs 10 crore from him.

If on the other hand, Jethmalani had on his own made the remark, then it would be a violation of the Bar Council of India rules, he said.

The said that such manner of cross examination cannot be allowed and something has to be done. It directed Jaitley's lawyers to file an application with regard to the adverse remarks made against him by Jethmalani.

"What is to be done when such scandalous remarks are made. It's unpleasant," Justice Manmohan said and added that "cross (examination) should be carried out in accordance with law".

The said if cross examination is carried out in this manner in rape cases then it would amount to the victim being raped all over again and that too in

Jethmalani had made the remarks yesterday before Joint Registrar Deepali Sharma when Jaitley was being cross-examined in the Rs 10 crore civil case filed by him against Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders for accusing him of financial irregularities in the and District Cricket Association (DDCA) of which he was the President from 2000 to 2013.

Five AAP leaders — Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai — along with Kejriwal are also facing a criminal case filed by Jaitley on the same issue.

The issue cropped up before Justice Manmohan who was hearing an application moved by Chadha for making amendments in his written submission filed in reply to Jaitley's plea.

During the hearing, the judge frowned upon the way the cross examination was carried out saying a person who has filed a case "cannot be further defamed in this manner".

The amendment application was listed before another bench by the on May 26.

Sparks flew during a charged-up hearing yesterday in the high after Jaitley lost his cool when Jethmalani used a scandalous word to describe him.

Jaitley, 64 , was in the for the fourth round of cross-examination by Jethmalani yesterday in his case against the AAP chief but the proceedings ended abruptly after an intense verbal duel broke out between the once close legal associates.

The proceedings had lasted barely 45 minutes.

The joint registrar had yesterday posted the cross examination on July 28 and 31.
image
Business Standard
177 22

Step into box if you instructed Jethmalani's remarks: Delhi HC to Kejriwal

Termed Ram Jethmalani's remarks against Arun Jaitley in defamation case as 'scandalous'

The High on Wednesday termed as "scandalous" certain remarks made by Kejriwal's lawyer against during his cross examination in a civil suit filed by the Union Minister.

Justice Manmohan said if such remarks were made on instructions of Kejriwal, then he should "first step into the box and make good his allegations" before continuing with Jaitley's cross examination.

"If such allegations have been made on instructions of Defendant 1 (Kejriwal), then no point in continuing with cross examination of plaintiff (Jaitley) any more. Let Defendant 1 make good his allegations. Let him step into the box," the judge orally observed.

Jaitley's senior advocates Rajiv Nayar and Sandeep Sethi had raised the issue before the saying they want a clarification from Kejriwal whether the remarks were made on his instructions or by Jethmalani on his own.

Nayar said if Kejriwal had instructed the senior lawyer to make the adverse remark, then they would seek additional aggravated damages of Rs 10 crore from him.

If on the other hand, Jethmalani had on his own made the remark, then it would be a violation of the Bar Council of India rules, he said.

The said that such manner of cross examination cannot be allowed and something has to be done. It directed Jaitley's lawyers to file an application with regard to the adverse remarks made against him by Jethmalani.

"What is to be done when such scandalous remarks are made. It's unpleasant," Justice Manmohan said and added that "cross (examination) should be carried out in accordance with law".

The said if cross examination is carried out in this manner in rape cases then it would amount to the victim being raped all over again and that too in

Jethmalani had made the remarks yesterday before Joint Registrar Deepali Sharma when Jaitley was being cross-examined in the Rs 10 crore civil case filed by him against Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders for accusing him of financial irregularities in the and District Cricket Association (DDCA) of which he was the President from 2000 to 2013.

Five AAP leaders — Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai — along with Kejriwal are also facing a criminal case filed by Jaitley on the same issue.

The issue cropped up before Justice Manmohan who was hearing an application moved by Chadha for making amendments in his written submission filed in reply to Jaitley's plea.

During the hearing, the judge frowned upon the way the cross examination was carried out saying a person who has filed a case "cannot be further defamed in this manner".

The amendment application was listed before another bench by the on May 26.

Sparks flew during a charged-up hearing yesterday in the high after Jaitley lost his cool when Jethmalani used a scandalous word to describe him.

Jaitley, 64 , was in the for the fourth round of cross-examination by Jethmalani yesterday in his case against the AAP chief but the proceedings ended abruptly after an intense verbal duel broke out between the once close legal associates.

The proceedings had lasted barely 45 minutes.

The joint registrar had yesterday posted the cross examination on July 28 and 31.

image
Business Standard
177 22