You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Cauvery: SC asks K'taka to release 2000 cusecs of water to TN

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The Supreme today retained its direction to to release 2000 cusecs of Cauvery water per day to till further orders and asked the two governments to ensure peace and harmony, saying citizens should not become unto themselves.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra, which commenced the crucial hearing on various issues arising out of the dispute between and over sharing of Cauvery waters, said it first intended to adjudicate the issue of maintainability of appeals filed by both the states and against the tribunal's 2013 award.



"We intend to first adjudicate issue of maintainability of appeals filed by Karnataka, and Kerala. At this juncture, the interim order dated October 4 directing to release 2000 cusecs of water per day to will continue till further orders," the bench also comprising Justices Amitava Roy and A M Khanwilkar said.

The bench said "morality of respect for both the states, among people of both the states and properties, should be maintained".

The also noted the submission of that it has complied with the earlier order of releasing 2000 cusecs of water to Tamil Nadu.

Both and said they were in dire need of water, which was even supported by Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi.

During the hearing, Rohatgi submitted that the apex court-appointed Supervisory Committee, formed to inspect Cauvery basin to assess the ground realities in the region, has submitted its report.

The bench said it would first go into the issue of maintainability of appeals filed by Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Puducherry against the award of tribunal and then hear the arguments on the report filed by the committee.

The Attorney General said the appeals filed by the states were not maintainable as per article 131 and 262 of the Constitution and the provisions of Inter-state River Water Disputes Act, 1956.

He said as per the constitutional provisions, a decree passed by a tribunal will be like a decree of Supreme which cannot hear the appeals against its own order.

Senior advocate and noted jurist Fali S Nariman, appearing for Karnataka, said the appeals are maintainable as Supreme can only adjudicate the disputes between two states.
The hearing remained inconclusive and will continue

tomorrow when will advance its arguments on maintainability of appeals.

The apex court-appointed panel had yesterday in its finding suggested doing away with "outdated and unscientific water application techniques" to resolve the wrangle, saying both and were facing water shortage which created unemployment and financial hardship for the people.

It had said the neighbouring riparian states needed to appreciate interest of and Puducherry to protect their established irrigation and Karnataka's aspirations for development and educate their people accordingly.

The panel in its 40-page report has noted that farmers in both states were in severe distress and adequate crop compensation must be provided to them.

The Supreme had on October 4 directed to release 2,000 cusecs Cauvery water every day to from October 7 to 18 and deferred its earlier order asking the Centre to set up Cauvery Water Management Board (CWMB) till it finally decided on appeals relating to the age-old water dispute.

The apex had agreed to the suggestion that a Supervisory Committee, comprising officials and technical experts from the Centre, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Puducherry, be set up to inspect Cauvery basin for assessing ground realities.

On September 30, SC had directed to discharge 6,000 cusecs water from October 1-6, warning it that no one would know when the "wrath of the law" would fall on it.

The apex had also directed the Centre to establish the CWMB, saying once it was constituted, its team would visit the sites to take a prima facie view of the ground reality and submit a report.

On October 1, had moved a review petition in the apex against its three orders on Cauvery water release to and direction to the Centre to create the CWMB.

In its review petition, said "grave miscarriage of justice" has been caused to it pursuant to the three apex orders of September 20, 27 and 30, by which it was directed to release 6000 cusecs of water till October 6 and the Centre was to constitute the Board by October 4.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Cauvery: SC asks K'taka to release 2000 cusecs of water to TN

The Supreme Court today retained its direction to Karnataka to release 2000 cusecs of Cauvery water per day to Tamil Nadu till further orders and asked the two governments to ensure peace and harmony, saying citizens should not become law unto themselves. A three-judge bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra, which commenced the crucial hearing on various issues arising out of the dispute between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka over sharing of Cauvery waters, said it first intended to adjudicate the issue of maintainability of appeals filed by both the states and Kerala against the tribunal's 2013 award. "We intend to first adjudicate issue of maintainability of appeals filed by Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Kerala. At this juncture, the interim order dated October 4 directing Karnataka to release 2000 cusecs of water per day to Tamil Nadu will continue till further orders," the bench also comprising Justices Amitava Roy and A M Khanwilkar said. The bench said "morality of respect for both the ... The Supreme today retained its direction to to release 2000 cusecs of Cauvery water per day to till further orders and asked the two governments to ensure peace and harmony, saying citizens should not become unto themselves.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra, which commenced the crucial hearing on various issues arising out of the dispute between and over sharing of Cauvery waters, said it first intended to adjudicate the issue of maintainability of appeals filed by both the states and against the tribunal's 2013 award.

"We intend to first adjudicate issue of maintainability of appeals filed by Karnataka, and Kerala. At this juncture, the interim order dated October 4 directing to release 2000 cusecs of water per day to will continue till further orders," the bench also comprising Justices Amitava Roy and A M Khanwilkar said.

The bench said "morality of respect for both the states, among people of both the states and properties, should be maintained".

The also noted the submission of that it has complied with the earlier order of releasing 2000 cusecs of water to Tamil Nadu.

Both and said they were in dire need of water, which was even supported by Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi.

During the hearing, Rohatgi submitted that the apex court-appointed Supervisory Committee, formed to inspect Cauvery basin to assess the ground realities in the region, has submitted its report.

The bench said it would first go into the issue of maintainability of appeals filed by Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Puducherry against the award of tribunal and then hear the arguments on the report filed by the committee.

The Attorney General said the appeals filed by the states were not maintainable as per article 131 and 262 of the Constitution and the provisions of Inter-state River Water Disputes Act, 1956.

He said as per the constitutional provisions, a decree passed by a tribunal will be like a decree of Supreme which cannot hear the appeals against its own order.

Senior advocate and noted jurist Fali S Nariman, appearing for Karnataka, said the appeals are maintainable as Supreme can only adjudicate the disputes between two states.
The hearing remained inconclusive and will continue

tomorrow when will advance its arguments on maintainability of appeals.

The apex court-appointed panel had yesterday in its finding suggested doing away with "outdated and unscientific water application techniques" to resolve the wrangle, saying both and were facing water shortage which created unemployment and financial hardship for the people.

It had said the neighbouring riparian states needed to appreciate interest of and Puducherry to protect their established irrigation and Karnataka's aspirations for development and educate their people accordingly.

The panel in its 40-page report has noted that farmers in both states were in severe distress and adequate crop compensation must be provided to them.

The Supreme had on October 4 directed to release 2,000 cusecs Cauvery water every day to from October 7 to 18 and deferred its earlier order asking the Centre to set up Cauvery Water Management Board (CWMB) till it finally decided on appeals relating to the age-old water dispute.

The apex had agreed to the suggestion that a Supervisory Committee, comprising officials and technical experts from the Centre, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Puducherry, be set up to inspect Cauvery basin for assessing ground realities.

On September 30, SC had directed to discharge 6,000 cusecs water from October 1-6, warning it that no one would know when the "wrath of the law" would fall on it.

The apex had also directed the Centre to establish the CWMB, saying once it was constituted, its team would visit the sites to take a prima facie view of the ground reality and submit a report.

On October 1, had moved a review petition in the apex against its three orders on Cauvery water release to and direction to the Centre to create the CWMB.

In its review petition, said "grave miscarriage of justice" has been caused to it pursuant to the three apex orders of September 20, 27 and 30, by which it was directed to release 6000 cusecs of water till October 6 and the Centre was to constitute the Board by October 4.
image
Business Standard
177 22

Cauvery: SC asks K'taka to release 2000 cusecs of water to TN

The Supreme today retained its direction to to release 2000 cusecs of Cauvery water per day to till further orders and asked the two governments to ensure peace and harmony, saying citizens should not become unto themselves.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice Dipak Misra, which commenced the crucial hearing on various issues arising out of the dispute between and over sharing of Cauvery waters, said it first intended to adjudicate the issue of maintainability of appeals filed by both the states and against the tribunal's 2013 award.

"We intend to first adjudicate issue of maintainability of appeals filed by Karnataka, and Kerala. At this juncture, the interim order dated October 4 directing to release 2000 cusecs of water per day to will continue till further orders," the bench also comprising Justices Amitava Roy and A M Khanwilkar said.

The bench said "morality of respect for both the states, among people of both the states and properties, should be maintained".

The also noted the submission of that it has complied with the earlier order of releasing 2000 cusecs of water to Tamil Nadu.

Both and said they were in dire need of water, which was even supported by Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi.

During the hearing, Rohatgi submitted that the apex court-appointed Supervisory Committee, formed to inspect Cauvery basin to assess the ground realities in the region, has submitted its report.

The bench said it would first go into the issue of maintainability of appeals filed by Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Puducherry against the award of tribunal and then hear the arguments on the report filed by the committee.

The Attorney General said the appeals filed by the states were not maintainable as per article 131 and 262 of the Constitution and the provisions of Inter-state River Water Disputes Act, 1956.

He said as per the constitutional provisions, a decree passed by a tribunal will be like a decree of Supreme which cannot hear the appeals against its own order.

Senior advocate and noted jurist Fali S Nariman, appearing for Karnataka, said the appeals are maintainable as Supreme can only adjudicate the disputes between two states.
The hearing remained inconclusive and will continue

tomorrow when will advance its arguments on maintainability of appeals.

The apex court-appointed panel had yesterday in its finding suggested doing away with "outdated and unscientific water application techniques" to resolve the wrangle, saying both and were facing water shortage which created unemployment and financial hardship for the people.

It had said the neighbouring riparian states needed to appreciate interest of and Puducherry to protect their established irrigation and Karnataka's aspirations for development and educate their people accordingly.

The panel in its 40-page report has noted that farmers in both states were in severe distress and adequate crop compensation must be provided to them.

The Supreme had on October 4 directed to release 2,000 cusecs Cauvery water every day to from October 7 to 18 and deferred its earlier order asking the Centre to set up Cauvery Water Management Board (CWMB) till it finally decided on appeals relating to the age-old water dispute.

The apex had agreed to the suggestion that a Supervisory Committee, comprising officials and technical experts from the Centre, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Puducherry, be set up to inspect Cauvery basin for assessing ground realities.

On September 30, SC had directed to discharge 6,000 cusecs water from October 1-6, warning it that no one would know when the "wrath of the law" would fall on it.

The apex had also directed the Centre to establish the CWMB, saying once it was constituted, its team would visit the sites to take a prima facie view of the ground reality and submit a report.

On October 1, had moved a review petition in the apex against its three orders on Cauvery water release to and direction to the Centre to create the CWMB.

In its review petition, said "grave miscarriage of justice" has been caused to it pursuant to the three apex orders of September 20, 27 and 30, by which it was directed to release 6000 cusecs of water till October 6 and the Centre was to constitute the Board by October 4.

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard