You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Court to frame charges against Kejriwal, Sisodia on Aug 23

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

A today fixed August 23 for framing charges against Chief Minister Kejriwal and his deputy Manish Sisodia in a criminal defamation complaint.

Metropolitan Magistrate Pranjal Aneja, who was scheduled to frame charges today, was on leave.


The had earlier directed the two leaders and Yogendra Yadav to appear before it today.

While Kejriwal and Sisodia sought exemption on the ground that they have to attend the four-day Monsoon session of Assembly which is commencing today, Yadav was present in the

The had on August 2 passed order on framing of notice (charge) on the criminal defamation complaint filed against the two leaders, who sought quashing of the plea, and Yadav by advocate Surender Kumar Sharma, who was denied ticket by the (AAP).

The had said in the order that the contentions on behalf of accused persons do no sustain and it proceeded to frame notice under the CrPC against them.

Yadav was a member of the National Executive of the until 2015, when he was expelled for alleged anti-party activities. Later, he floated his own party Swaraj India.

Sharma, in his complaint, had alleged that in 2013 he was approached by volunteers of who had asked him to contest the Assembly elections on a party ticket, saying Kejriwal waspleased with his social services.

He filled up the application form to contest the polls after being told by Sisodia and Yadav that AAP's Political Affairs Committee had decided to give him theticket.

However, it was later denied to him.

On October 14, 2013 the complainant claimed, articles inleading newspapers carried "defamatory, unlawful and derogatory words used by the accused persons" which have lowered his reputation in the Bar and the society.

Opposing the complaint, the leaders had submitted that cancellation or allotment of an election ticket is the prerogative of the party and the complainant had not divulged correct information as to the cases pending against him.

On the basis of the complaint, the trial had earlier sought their presence before it in the matter.

It, however, had granted bail to Kejriwal, Sisodia and Yadav, after they had appeared before it in pursuance to summonses against them.

The summonses were issued on the complaint under sections499, 500 (defamation) and 34 (common intention) of the IPC,with the trial saying there was prima facie material to summon the accused.

While issuing summonses against leaders, the trial had said, "The press release published in newspapers as well as testimonies of witnesses reflect that defamatory remarks werepublished in the newspaper which affected the reputation of the complainant in the society and lowered his reputation inthe eyes of other members of the society."

The High had earlier refused to stay the trial proceedings in the case.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU