You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Defamation case: HC to pronounce verdict on Kejriwal's plea

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

High is likely to deliver tomorrow its decision on Chief Minister Kejriwal's plea to stay the proceedings before a trial in a criminal defamation case filed against him and other AAP leaders by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley.

The high had reserved its verdict on July 25 on Kejriwal's plea challenging the trial court's May 19 order by which it had turned down the Chief Minister's request to adjourn hearing on a criminal defamation case before it, till the high decided a related civil suit.



As per Kejriwal's plea, there are two cases--one civil and the other criminal--filed against AAP leaders on the same allegations and the trial should have stayed the proceedings in the matter, but it had declined.

"The trial judge had said that he has no power to stay the proceedings," senior advocate Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Kejriwal, had said during the arguments by quoting from the lower court's order and had added, "Power to stay can be exercised by postponing the matter also"

Opposing the contention, senior advocates Harish Salve and Siddharth Luthra, representing Jaitley, had said that in "today's world, the words used are more powerful than sword".

"No prejudice would be caused to the AAP leaders if both the civil suit before high and the criminal proceedings before the trial go contemporaneously," Luthra had said.

Jaitley had filed a criminal defamation complaint alleging Kejriwal and five AAP leaders -- Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai -- had defamed him in the District Cricket Association (DDCA) controversy.

On April 7, the trial had granted bail to Kejriwal and others after they had appeared before it.

Jaitley had on December 21, 2015 filed the criminal defamation case against the AAP leaders and sought their prosecution for offences that entail a punishment of up to two years in jail.

Besides the criminal defamation case, Jaitley has also filed a civil defamation suit in the High seeking Rs 10 crore in damages from Kejriwal and the five AAP leaders for issuing allegedly false and defamatory statements against him and his family in connection with alleged irregularities in DDCA when he was its president.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Defamation case: HC to pronounce verdict on Kejriwal's plea

Delhi High Court is likely to deliver tomorrow its decision on Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's plea to stay the proceedings before a trial court in a criminal defamation case filed against him and other AAP leaders by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The high court had reserved its verdict on July 25 on Kejriwal's plea challenging the trial court's May 19 order by which it had turned down the Delhi Chief Minister's request to adjourn hearing on a criminal defamation case before it, till the high court decided a related civil suit. As per Kejriwal's plea, there are two cases--one civil and the other criminal--filed against AAP leaders on the same allegations and the trial court should have stayed the proceedings in the matter, but it had declined. "The trial court judge had said that he has no power to stay the proceedings," senior advocate Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Kejriwal, had said during the arguments by quoting from the lower court's order and had added, "Power to stay can ... High is likely to deliver tomorrow its decision on Chief Minister Kejriwal's plea to stay the proceedings before a trial in a criminal defamation case filed against him and other AAP leaders by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley.

The high had reserved its verdict on July 25 on Kejriwal's plea challenging the trial court's May 19 order by which it had turned down the Chief Minister's request to adjourn hearing on a criminal defamation case before it, till the high decided a related civil suit.

As per Kejriwal's plea, there are two cases--one civil and the other criminal--filed against AAP leaders on the same allegations and the trial should have stayed the proceedings in the matter, but it had declined.

"The trial judge had said that he has no power to stay the proceedings," senior advocate Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Kejriwal, had said during the arguments by quoting from the lower court's order and had added, "Power to stay can be exercised by postponing the matter also"

Opposing the contention, senior advocates Harish Salve and Siddharth Luthra, representing Jaitley, had said that in "today's world, the words used are more powerful than sword".

"No prejudice would be caused to the AAP leaders if both the civil suit before high and the criminal proceedings before the trial go contemporaneously," Luthra had said.

Jaitley had filed a criminal defamation complaint alleging Kejriwal and five AAP leaders -- Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai -- had defamed him in the District Cricket Association (DDCA) controversy.

On April 7, the trial had granted bail to Kejriwal and others after they had appeared before it.

Jaitley had on December 21, 2015 filed the criminal defamation case against the AAP leaders and sought their prosecution for offences that entail a punishment of up to two years in jail.

Besides the criminal defamation case, Jaitley has also filed a civil defamation suit in the High seeking Rs 10 crore in damages from Kejriwal and the five AAP leaders for issuing allegedly false and defamatory statements against him and his family in connection with alleged irregularities in DDCA when he was its president.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Defamation case: HC to pronounce verdict on Kejriwal's plea

High is likely to deliver tomorrow its decision on Chief Minister Kejriwal's plea to stay the proceedings before a trial in a criminal defamation case filed against him and other AAP leaders by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley.

The high had reserved its verdict on July 25 on Kejriwal's plea challenging the trial court's May 19 order by which it had turned down the Chief Minister's request to adjourn hearing on a criminal defamation case before it, till the high decided a related civil suit.

As per Kejriwal's plea, there are two cases--one civil and the other criminal--filed against AAP leaders on the same allegations and the trial should have stayed the proceedings in the matter, but it had declined.

"The trial judge had said that he has no power to stay the proceedings," senior advocate Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Kejriwal, had said during the arguments by quoting from the lower court's order and had added, "Power to stay can be exercised by postponing the matter also"

Opposing the contention, senior advocates Harish Salve and Siddharth Luthra, representing Jaitley, had said that in "today's world, the words used are more powerful than sword".

"No prejudice would be caused to the AAP leaders if both the civil suit before high and the criminal proceedings before the trial go contemporaneously," Luthra had said.

Jaitley had filed a criminal defamation complaint alleging Kejriwal and five AAP leaders -- Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai -- had defamed him in the District Cricket Association (DDCA) controversy.

On April 7, the trial had granted bail to Kejriwal and others after they had appeared before it.

Jaitley had on December 21, 2015 filed the criminal defamation case against the AAP leaders and sought their prosecution for offences that entail a punishment of up to two years in jail.

Besides the criminal defamation case, Jaitley has also filed a civil defamation suit in the High seeking Rs 10 crore in damages from Kejriwal and the five AAP leaders for issuing allegedly false and defamatory statements against him and his family in connection with alleged irregularities in DDCA when he was its president.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard