You are here: Home » Budget » Run-up » Economy
Business Standard

Exempt telecom goods made in SEZs from basic customs duty: COAI

Says such exemption will lower the cost of telecom network

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

industry body has suggested that telecom goods manufactured in the country in special economic zones (SEZs) should be exempted from basic customs duty.

In its recommendations, said manufacturers producing goods in SEZs meet the objective of 'Make in India'.
Read our full coverage on Union Budget

"Such exemption would lower the cost of telecom network while at the same time, supporting the "Digital India" project of the Prime Minister," Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) said.

also said any increase in rate of tax from current 12% (service tax) to a higher rate under would increase the cost of telecom service, an essential service for common man.

"A consultation process with trade and industry bodies should be initiated for GST, and a platform for such consultation should be formed," it said.

The body said in last year's Budget, exemption from payment of customs duty was withdrawn on import of specified telecom products without mentioning the specific name or description of the products.

has requested that the specific names of these items should be stated, without which classification of goods have become ambiguous.

The industry body has also sought clarity on taxability of interconnect usage charges (IUC).

Currently, the issue of taxability of IUC is sub-judice whereas for international private leased circuit and satellite services, the judiciary in India has held that these are standard services and hence fee for same cannot be taxed as royalty under Indian tax laws.

However, Finance Act, 2012, retrospectively amended the definition of 'royalty' to include transmission by satellite, cable, optic fibre, or similar technology.

said by virtue of this amendment, payments made by telecom companies, even for standard telecom services could be considered as 'royalty' by tax authorities, resulting in protracted litigation.

suggested that "definition of the term 'royalty' should be reinstated with retrospective effect, as it was before the amendment in 2012, which is also aligned with international practice.

First Published: Fri, January 30 2015. 17:10 IST