You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

HC defers till Oct 25 hearing on PIL seeking CBI inquiry into

Press Trust of India  |  Allahabad 

The High today deferred till October 25 its hearing on a PIL seeking transfer of the investigation into the Jawahar Bagh incident of Mathura to the CBI, even as one of the petitioners alleged that the government's counter affidavit was "vague, false and incorrect".

More than 20 people, including two police officials, were killed in violence that erupted during an eviction drive in June following a order and a huge cache of explosives, arms and ammunition were recovered from the sprawling public park which had remained under illegal occupation by followers of a self-styled cult leader Ram Vriksh Yadav.



A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice D B Bhosale and Justice Yashwant Varma deferred hearing on the PILs on account of non-appearance of Advocate General Vijay Bahadur Singh, who has been appearing on behalf of the state government in the matter.

Upon coming out of the room, lead petitioner Ashwini Upadhyay charged, "The state government has been, on each and every date of hearing, coming up with new tricks to protect senior leaders of the ruling Samajwadi Party whose role in facilitating the land grab is under scanner."

Earlier, in his rejoinder filed before the court, Upadhyay contended that the state government "does not have answers to questions raised in the petition" and hence "it has filed a vague, false and incorrect reply".

Upadhyay also sought to underscore that the state government filed its counter affidavit only on September 30 "although the had directed the respondents to do the same by September 22".

He added that the state government was yet to comply with order dated July 7 whereby it had been directed by the to furnish copies of charge sheets filed against more than 100 people in connection with the violence at Mathura.

Responding to the state government's contention that the PILs, including the one filed by Upadhyay, were "politically motivated", the BJP leader submitted that he was previously associated with India Against Corruption and the Anna Hazare agitation besides having been a founding member of the Aam Aadmi Party and that he had "filed this PIL in personal capacity".

Upadhyay also assailed the state government's submission that a judicial probe had already been ordered into the entire episode at Mathura, saying "the scope of the one-member judicial commission and a investigation are entirely different".

He also claimed that wife and brother of Mukul Dwivedi, the Superintendent of Police who was among those killed in the violence that erupted during the eviction drive, have alleged that he was made a "scapegoat" and favoured a inquiry into his death.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

HC defers till Oct 25 hearing on PIL seeking CBI inquiry into

The Allahabad High Court today deferred till October 25 its hearing on a PIL seeking transfer of the investigation into the Jawahar Bagh incident of Mathura to the CBI, even as one of the petitioners alleged that the Uttar Pradesh government's counter affidavit was "vague, false and incorrect". More than 20 people, including two police officials, were killed in violence that erupted during an eviction drive in June following a court order and a huge cache of explosives, arms and ammunition were recovered from the sprawling public park which had remained under illegal occupation by followers of a self-styled cult leader Ram Vriksh Yadav. A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice D B Bhosale and Justice Yashwant Varma deferred hearing on the PILs on account of non-appearance of Advocate General Vijay Bahadur Singh, who has been appearing on behalf of the state government in the matter. Upon coming out of the court room, lead petitioner Ashwini Upadhyay charged, "The state government ... The High today deferred till October 25 its hearing on a PIL seeking transfer of the investigation into the Jawahar Bagh incident of Mathura to the CBI, even as one of the petitioners alleged that the government's counter affidavit was "vague, false and incorrect".

More than 20 people, including two police officials, were killed in violence that erupted during an eviction drive in June following a order and a huge cache of explosives, arms and ammunition were recovered from the sprawling public park which had remained under illegal occupation by followers of a self-styled cult leader Ram Vriksh Yadav.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice D B Bhosale and Justice Yashwant Varma deferred hearing on the PILs on account of non-appearance of Advocate General Vijay Bahadur Singh, who has been appearing on behalf of the state government in the matter.

Upon coming out of the room, lead petitioner Ashwini Upadhyay charged, "The state government has been, on each and every date of hearing, coming up with new tricks to protect senior leaders of the ruling Samajwadi Party whose role in facilitating the land grab is under scanner."

Earlier, in his rejoinder filed before the court, Upadhyay contended that the state government "does not have answers to questions raised in the petition" and hence "it has filed a vague, false and incorrect reply".

Upadhyay also sought to underscore that the state government filed its counter affidavit only on September 30 "although the had directed the respondents to do the same by September 22".

He added that the state government was yet to comply with order dated July 7 whereby it had been directed by the to furnish copies of charge sheets filed against more than 100 people in connection with the violence at Mathura.

Responding to the state government's contention that the PILs, including the one filed by Upadhyay, were "politically motivated", the BJP leader submitted that he was previously associated with India Against Corruption and the Anna Hazare agitation besides having been a founding member of the Aam Aadmi Party and that he had "filed this PIL in personal capacity".

Upadhyay also assailed the state government's submission that a judicial probe had already been ordered into the entire episode at Mathura, saying "the scope of the one-member judicial commission and a investigation are entirely different".

He also claimed that wife and brother of Mukul Dwivedi, the Superintendent of Police who was among those killed in the violence that erupted during the eviction drive, have alleged that he was made a "scapegoat" and favoured a inquiry into his death.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

HC defers till Oct 25 hearing on PIL seeking CBI inquiry into

The High today deferred till October 25 its hearing on a PIL seeking transfer of the investigation into the Jawahar Bagh incident of Mathura to the CBI, even as one of the petitioners alleged that the government's counter affidavit was "vague, false and incorrect".

More than 20 people, including two police officials, were killed in violence that erupted during an eviction drive in June following a order and a huge cache of explosives, arms and ammunition were recovered from the sprawling public park which had remained under illegal occupation by followers of a self-styled cult leader Ram Vriksh Yadav.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice D B Bhosale and Justice Yashwant Varma deferred hearing on the PILs on account of non-appearance of Advocate General Vijay Bahadur Singh, who has been appearing on behalf of the state government in the matter.

Upon coming out of the room, lead petitioner Ashwini Upadhyay charged, "The state government has been, on each and every date of hearing, coming up with new tricks to protect senior leaders of the ruling Samajwadi Party whose role in facilitating the land grab is under scanner."

Earlier, in his rejoinder filed before the court, Upadhyay contended that the state government "does not have answers to questions raised in the petition" and hence "it has filed a vague, false and incorrect reply".

Upadhyay also sought to underscore that the state government filed its counter affidavit only on September 30 "although the had directed the respondents to do the same by September 22".

He added that the state government was yet to comply with order dated July 7 whereby it had been directed by the to furnish copies of charge sheets filed against more than 100 people in connection with the violence at Mathura.

Responding to the state government's contention that the PILs, including the one filed by Upadhyay, were "politically motivated", the BJP leader submitted that he was previously associated with India Against Corruption and the Anna Hazare agitation besides having been a founding member of the Aam Aadmi Party and that he had "filed this PIL in personal capacity".

Upadhyay also assailed the state government's submission that a judicial probe had already been ordered into the entire episode at Mathura, saying "the scope of the one-member judicial commission and a investigation are entirely different".

He also claimed that wife and brother of Mukul Dwivedi, the Superintendent of Police who was among those killed in the violence that erupted during the eviction drive, have alleged that he was made a "scapegoat" and favoured a inquiry into his death.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard