You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

HC directs TN medical council chairman to appear before it

Press Trust of India  |  Chennai 

The Madras High directed the Chairman of Medical Council to appear before it tomorrow to explain how a doctor, whose registration was suspended, continued his practise in his village, violating the council's orders.

Justice N Kirubakaran gave the direction when a by suspended doctor Dr K Ramachandran, who runs a nursing home with a scan centre at Periakurichi in Cuddalore District came up before him, seeking to quash the May 24, 2016 order of the Council, suspending his registration.



The Council had suspended him for violating the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Technique(Prohibition of Sex Selection Act), 1994.

On February 7, 2014, based on complaints against the nursing home, officials made a surprise visit. Two days later senior medical personnel also went there, interacted with staff and a pregnant woman.

Acting on the team's report, the Sub-District Appropriate Authority seized machinery and other accessories in the Nursing Home, sealed it and suspended it's registration.

It also lodged a private complaint under PCPNDT Act and Section 3 and 4 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act. A criminal case was registered against the doctor.

The petitioner, meanwhile, preferred an appeal before the District Appropriate Authority. As it did not dispose it, he moved the High which directed the appellate authority to dispose it in eight weeks, which too was not done.

On February 17, the council's order said the charges against the doctor were proved and recommended that his name be erased from Medical Register for five years.

The doctor then moved the Madras High which set-aside the orderwith a direction to the Council to pass fresh orders as per Section 23(2) of the PCPNDT Act.

The Council in its May 24 order said his registration was suspended till disposal of case, which he challenged.

The petitioner submitted that in view of repealing of Amendment Act 14 of 2003 which came into force from May 9, the Council's power to place a medical practitioner under suspension pending criminal charges have been removed.

The Judge asked the Assistant Solicitor General Su Srinivasan, appearing for the Union why these stringent provisions were diluted by the Centre and under what circumstances these were diluted.

Medical Council submitted that despite the order, the doctor is practising and produced a prescription issued by the doctor during the suspension period.

The Judge after recording all the submissions, directed the Chairman to be present in the tomorrow.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

HC directs TN medical council chairman to appear before it

The Madras High Court directed the Chairman of Tamil Nadu Medical Council to appear before it tomorrow to explain how a doctor, whose registration was suspended, continued his practise in his village, violating the council's orders. Justice N Kirubakaran gave the direction when a petition by suspended doctor Dr K Ramachandran, who runs a nursing home with a scan centre at Periakurichi in Cuddalore District came up before him, seeking to quash the May 24, 2016 order of the Council, suspending his registration. The Council had suspended him for violating the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Technique(Prohibition of Sex Selection Act), 1994. On February 7, 2014, based on complaints against the nursing home, officials made a surprise visit. Two days later senior government medical personnel also went there, interacted with staff and a pregnant woman. Acting on the team's report, the Sub-District Appropriate Authority seized machinery and other accessories in the Nursing Home, ... The Madras High directed the Chairman of Medical Council to appear before it tomorrow to explain how a doctor, whose registration was suspended, continued his practise in his village, violating the council's orders.

Justice N Kirubakaran gave the direction when a by suspended doctor Dr K Ramachandran, who runs a nursing home with a scan centre at Periakurichi in Cuddalore District came up before him, seeking to quash the May 24, 2016 order of the Council, suspending his registration.

The Council had suspended him for violating the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Technique(Prohibition of Sex Selection Act), 1994.

On February 7, 2014, based on complaints against the nursing home, officials made a surprise visit. Two days later senior medical personnel also went there, interacted with staff and a pregnant woman.

Acting on the team's report, the Sub-District Appropriate Authority seized machinery and other accessories in the Nursing Home, sealed it and suspended it's registration.

It also lodged a private complaint under PCPNDT Act and Section 3 and 4 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act. A criminal case was registered against the doctor.

The petitioner, meanwhile, preferred an appeal before the District Appropriate Authority. As it did not dispose it, he moved the High which directed the appellate authority to dispose it in eight weeks, which too was not done.

On February 17, the council's order said the charges against the doctor were proved and recommended that his name be erased from Medical Register for five years.

The doctor then moved the Madras High which set-aside the orderwith a direction to the Council to pass fresh orders as per Section 23(2) of the PCPNDT Act.

The Council in its May 24 order said his registration was suspended till disposal of case, which he challenged.

The petitioner submitted that in view of repealing of Amendment Act 14 of 2003 which came into force from May 9, the Council's power to place a medical practitioner under suspension pending criminal charges have been removed.

The Judge asked the Assistant Solicitor General Su Srinivasan, appearing for the Union why these stringent provisions were diluted by the Centre and under what circumstances these were diluted.

Medical Council submitted that despite the order, the doctor is practising and produced a prescription issued by the doctor during the suspension period.

The Judge after recording all the submissions, directed the Chairman to be present in the tomorrow.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

HC directs TN medical council chairman to appear before it

The Madras High directed the Chairman of Medical Council to appear before it tomorrow to explain how a doctor, whose registration was suspended, continued his practise in his village, violating the council's orders.

Justice N Kirubakaran gave the direction when a by suspended doctor Dr K Ramachandran, who runs a nursing home with a scan centre at Periakurichi in Cuddalore District came up before him, seeking to quash the May 24, 2016 order of the Council, suspending his registration.

The Council had suspended him for violating the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Technique(Prohibition of Sex Selection Act), 1994.

On February 7, 2014, based on complaints against the nursing home, officials made a surprise visit. Two days later senior medical personnel also went there, interacted with staff and a pregnant woman.

Acting on the team's report, the Sub-District Appropriate Authority seized machinery and other accessories in the Nursing Home, sealed it and suspended it's registration.

It also lodged a private complaint under PCPNDT Act and Section 3 and 4 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act. A criminal case was registered against the doctor.

The petitioner, meanwhile, preferred an appeal before the District Appropriate Authority. As it did not dispose it, he moved the High which directed the appellate authority to dispose it in eight weeks, which too was not done.

On February 17, the council's order said the charges against the doctor were proved and recommended that his name be erased from Medical Register for five years.

The doctor then moved the Madras High which set-aside the orderwith a direction to the Council to pass fresh orders as per Section 23(2) of the PCPNDT Act.

The Council in its May 24 order said his registration was suspended till disposal of case, which he challenged.

The petitioner submitted that in view of repealing of Amendment Act 14 of 2003 which came into force from May 9, the Council's power to place a medical practitioner under suspension pending criminal charges have been removed.

The Judge asked the Assistant Solicitor General Su Srinivasan, appearing for the Union why these stringent provisions were diluted by the Centre and under what circumstances these were diluted.

Medical Council submitted that despite the order, the doctor is practising and produced a prescription issued by the doctor during the suspension period.

The Judge after recording all the submissions, directed the Chairman to be present in the tomorrow.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard