You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

HC dismisses Kejriwal's plea to stay defamation case

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Chief Minister Kejriwal today suffered a setback when the High dismissed his plea to stay a trial proceedings in a criminal defamation case against him and other AAP leaders filed by Finance Minister saying, "it is devoid of merit".

"The request of the petitioner to adjourn the proceedings before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) is rejected, being devoid of merit and the same is culminated into dismissal of the present petition," Justice P S Teji said.



"Nothing have been brought before this to the effect that continuation of criminal proceedings is abuse of the process of before the CMM and any order is required by this to secure the ends of justice.

"Thus, this is of the view that the order of the CMM, dated May 19, 2016 continuing with the proceedings is free from perversity, impropriety, illegality and non- sustainability which compelled this to exercise the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr PC," the said.
The high also held that there is no illegality or

unsustainability in the in continuation of the criminal proceedings before the CMM and it is empowered to continue with the same.

The had reserved its verdict on July 25 on Kejriwal's plea challenging the trial court's May 19 order by which it had turned down the Chief Minister's request to adjourn hearing on a criminal defamation case before it, till the high decides a related civil suit.

In his plea, Kejriwal contended that there are two cases--one civil and the other criminal--filed against AAP leaders on the same allegations and the trial should have stayed the proceedings in the matter, but it had declined.

Jaitley had filed a criminal defamation complaint alleging Kejriwal and five AAP leaders--Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai--had defamed him in the District Cricket Association (DDCA) controversy.

On April 7, the trial had granted bail to Kejriwal and others in the case after they had appeared before it.

Jaitley had on December 21, 2015, filed the criminal defamation case against the AAP leaders and sought their prosecution for offences that entail a punishment of up to two years in jail.

Besides the criminal defamation case, Jaitley has also filed a civil defamation suit in the High seeking Rs 10 crore in damages from Kejriwal and the five AAP leaders for issuing allegedly false and defamatory statements against him and his family in connection with alleged irregularities in DDCA when he was its president.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

HC dismisses Kejriwal's plea to stay defamation case

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal today suffered a setback when the Delhi High Court dismissed his plea to stay a trial court proceedings in a criminal defamation case against him and other AAP leaders filed by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley saying, "it is devoid of merit". "The request of the petitioner to adjourn the court proceedings before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) is rejected, being devoid of merit and the same is culminated into dismissal of the present petition," Justice P S Teji said. "Nothing have been brought before this court to the effect that continuation of criminal proceedings is abuse of the process of law before the CMM and any order is required by this court to secure the ends of justice. "Thus, this court is of the view that the order of the CMM, dated May 19, 2016 continuing with the proceedings is free from perversity, impropriety, illegality and non- sustainability which compelled this court to exercise the inherent jurisdiction under Section . Chief Minister Kejriwal today suffered a setback when the High dismissed his plea to stay a trial proceedings in a criminal defamation case against him and other AAP leaders filed by Finance Minister saying, "it is devoid of merit".

"The request of the petitioner to adjourn the proceedings before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) is rejected, being devoid of merit and the same is culminated into dismissal of the present petition," Justice P S Teji said.

"Nothing have been brought before this to the effect that continuation of criminal proceedings is abuse of the process of before the CMM and any order is required by this to secure the ends of justice.

"Thus, this is of the view that the order of the CMM, dated May 19, 2016 continuing with the proceedings is free from perversity, impropriety, illegality and non- sustainability which compelled this to exercise the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr PC," the said.
The high also held that there is no illegality or

unsustainability in the in continuation of the criminal proceedings before the CMM and it is empowered to continue with the same.

The had reserved its verdict on July 25 on Kejriwal's plea challenging the trial court's May 19 order by which it had turned down the Chief Minister's request to adjourn hearing on a criminal defamation case before it, till the high decides a related civil suit.

In his plea, Kejriwal contended that there are two cases--one civil and the other criminal--filed against AAP leaders on the same allegations and the trial should have stayed the proceedings in the matter, but it had declined.

Jaitley had filed a criminal defamation complaint alleging Kejriwal and five AAP leaders--Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai--had defamed him in the District Cricket Association (DDCA) controversy.

On April 7, the trial had granted bail to Kejriwal and others in the case after they had appeared before it.

Jaitley had on December 21, 2015, filed the criminal defamation case against the AAP leaders and sought their prosecution for offences that entail a punishment of up to two years in jail.

Besides the criminal defamation case, Jaitley has also filed a civil defamation suit in the High seeking Rs 10 crore in damages from Kejriwal and the five AAP leaders for issuing allegedly false and defamatory statements against him and his family in connection with alleged irregularities in DDCA when he was its president.
image
Business Standard
177 22

HC dismisses Kejriwal's plea to stay defamation case

Chief Minister Kejriwal today suffered a setback when the High dismissed his plea to stay a trial proceedings in a criminal defamation case against him and other AAP leaders filed by Finance Minister saying, "it is devoid of merit".

"The request of the petitioner to adjourn the proceedings before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) is rejected, being devoid of merit and the same is culminated into dismissal of the present petition," Justice P S Teji said.

"Nothing have been brought before this to the effect that continuation of criminal proceedings is abuse of the process of before the CMM and any order is required by this to secure the ends of justice.

"Thus, this is of the view that the order of the CMM, dated May 19, 2016 continuing with the proceedings is free from perversity, impropriety, illegality and non- sustainability which compelled this to exercise the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr PC," the said.
The high also held that there is no illegality or

unsustainability in the in continuation of the criminal proceedings before the CMM and it is empowered to continue with the same.

The had reserved its verdict on July 25 on Kejriwal's plea challenging the trial court's May 19 order by which it had turned down the Chief Minister's request to adjourn hearing on a criminal defamation case before it, till the high decides a related civil suit.

In his plea, Kejriwal contended that there are two cases--one civil and the other criminal--filed against AAP leaders on the same allegations and the trial should have stayed the proceedings in the matter, but it had declined.

Jaitley had filed a criminal defamation complaint alleging Kejriwal and five AAP leaders--Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai--had defamed him in the District Cricket Association (DDCA) controversy.

On April 7, the trial had granted bail to Kejriwal and others in the case after they had appeared before it.

Jaitley had on December 21, 2015, filed the criminal defamation case against the AAP leaders and sought their prosecution for offences that entail a punishment of up to two years in jail.

Besides the criminal defamation case, Jaitley has also filed a civil defamation suit in the High seeking Rs 10 crore in damages from Kejriwal and the five AAP leaders for issuing allegedly false and defamatory statements against him and his family in connection with alleged irregularities in DDCA when he was its president.

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard