You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

HC disposes of pleas challenging entry tax on online orders

Press Trust of India  |  Ahmedabad 

The High today disposed of a set of petitions filed by e-commerce players Flipkart, Amazon, and Instakart challenging the entry imposed by the state on the goods purchased through e-commerce portals.

A division bench of Chief Justice R Subhash Reddy and Justice V M Pancholi disposed of the petitions in view of a recent Supreme judgement, which upheld the validity of entry imposed by the states.



The high court, however, allowed the petitioners to approach the relevant adjudicating authorities for raising procedural matters arising from the imposition of entry tax.

The Supreme had last month upheld the constitutional validity of the state legislations with regard to the levy of entry on goods coming from other states, ruling that legislation by the state does not require the consent of the President under Article 304 of the Constitution.

Internet Pvt Ltd, Amazon Seller Services Pvt Ltd, and Instakart Services Pvt Ltd had in April and May moved the high with petitions challenging the imposition of entry by on goods purchased on e-commerce platforms.

The petitioners claimed that the state government's amendment to the law to levy entry on goods purchased through e-commerce portals was discriminatory as no such is imposed on goods brought into through other modes of sale.

They argued that they only provide online platform to manufacturers, traders and buyers and are themselves not involved in selling any product and hence the is unjustified.

However, the had argued that it was done to provide a level-playing field to traders and retailers in the state.

The on Entry of Specified Goods into Local Areas (Amendment) Bill, was passed on March 31 this year. From April 1, any goods being purchased online is being subject to 5 to 15 per cent entry tax. While normal goods are being levied five per cent tax, specified goods are subject to up to 15 per cent tax.

The bill amended the Act of 2001 to bring e-commerce transactions in its ambit, as it felt this was adversely-affecting local traders.

The new law amends the word "importer" to cover those who "bring or facilitate to bring any specified goods for consumption, use or sale in from any part of the country using online platforms.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

HC disposes of pleas challenging entry tax on online orders

The Gujarat High Court today disposed of a set of petitions filed by e-commerce players Flipkart, Amazon, and Instakart challenging the entry tax imposed by the state government on the goods purchased through e-commerce portals. A division bench of Chief Justice R Subhash Reddy and Justice V M Pancholi disposed of the petitions in view of a recent Supreme Court judgement, which upheld the validity of entry tax imposed by the states. The high court, however, allowed the petitioners to approach the relevant adjudicating authorities for raising procedural matters arising from the imposition of entry tax. The Supreme Court had last month upheld the constitutional validity of the state legislations with regard to the levy of entry tax on goods coming from other states, ruling that tax legislation by the state does not require the consent of the President under Article 304 of the Constitution. Flipkart Internet Pvt Ltd, Amazon Seller Services Pvt Ltd, and Instakart Services Pvt Ltd had ... The High today disposed of a set of petitions filed by e-commerce players Flipkart, Amazon, and Instakart challenging the entry imposed by the state on the goods purchased through e-commerce portals.

A division bench of Chief Justice R Subhash Reddy and Justice V M Pancholi disposed of the petitions in view of a recent Supreme judgement, which upheld the validity of entry imposed by the states.

The high court, however, allowed the petitioners to approach the relevant adjudicating authorities for raising procedural matters arising from the imposition of entry tax.

The Supreme had last month upheld the constitutional validity of the state legislations with regard to the levy of entry on goods coming from other states, ruling that legislation by the state does not require the consent of the President under Article 304 of the Constitution.

Internet Pvt Ltd, Amazon Seller Services Pvt Ltd, and Instakart Services Pvt Ltd had in April and May moved the high with petitions challenging the imposition of entry by on goods purchased on e-commerce platforms.

The petitioners claimed that the state government's amendment to the law to levy entry on goods purchased through e-commerce portals was discriminatory as no such is imposed on goods brought into through other modes of sale.

They argued that they only provide online platform to manufacturers, traders and buyers and are themselves not involved in selling any product and hence the is unjustified.

However, the had argued that it was done to provide a level-playing field to traders and retailers in the state.

The on Entry of Specified Goods into Local Areas (Amendment) Bill, was passed on March 31 this year. From April 1, any goods being purchased online is being subject to 5 to 15 per cent entry tax. While normal goods are being levied five per cent tax, specified goods are subject to up to 15 per cent tax.

The bill amended the Act of 2001 to bring e-commerce transactions in its ambit, as it felt this was adversely-affecting local traders.

The new law amends the word "importer" to cover those who "bring or facilitate to bring any specified goods for consumption, use or sale in from any part of the country using online platforms.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

HC disposes of pleas challenging entry tax on online orders

The High today disposed of a set of petitions filed by e-commerce players Flipkart, Amazon, and Instakart challenging the entry imposed by the state on the goods purchased through e-commerce portals.

A division bench of Chief Justice R Subhash Reddy and Justice V M Pancholi disposed of the petitions in view of a recent Supreme judgement, which upheld the validity of entry imposed by the states.

The high court, however, allowed the petitioners to approach the relevant adjudicating authorities for raising procedural matters arising from the imposition of entry tax.

The Supreme had last month upheld the constitutional validity of the state legislations with regard to the levy of entry on goods coming from other states, ruling that legislation by the state does not require the consent of the President under Article 304 of the Constitution.

Internet Pvt Ltd, Amazon Seller Services Pvt Ltd, and Instakart Services Pvt Ltd had in April and May moved the high with petitions challenging the imposition of entry by on goods purchased on e-commerce platforms.

The petitioners claimed that the state government's amendment to the law to levy entry on goods purchased through e-commerce portals was discriminatory as no such is imposed on goods brought into through other modes of sale.

They argued that they only provide online platform to manufacturers, traders and buyers and are themselves not involved in selling any product and hence the is unjustified.

However, the had argued that it was done to provide a level-playing field to traders and retailers in the state.

The on Entry of Specified Goods into Local Areas (Amendment) Bill, was passed on March 31 this year. From April 1, any goods being purchased online is being subject to 5 to 15 per cent entry tax. While normal goods are being levied five per cent tax, specified goods are subject to up to 15 per cent tax.

The bill amended the Act of 2001 to bring e-commerce transactions in its ambit, as it felt this was adversely-affecting local traders.

The new law amends the word "importer" to cover those who "bring or facilitate to bring any specified goods for consumption, use or sale in from any part of the country using online platforms.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard