ALSO READ63 Moons shares fall 5 pc after court rejects petition Bombay HC issues notice to Maha Govt. over petition seeking security for meat traders Bombay HC issues notice to senior officials over pesticide Will have to test applicability of RERA, says Bombay HC Bombay High Court refuses to stay tunnel work on Metro III line
The Bombay High Court today dismissed a petition filed by the erstwhile Financial Technologies (India) Ltd (FTIL) challenging a 2016 decision of the Union government ordering its merger with its subsidiary, National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL).
"The petition is dismissed," said a division bench of Chief Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice M S Sonak.
The court, however, extended for 12 weeks an interim stay granted last year to the merger order passed by the Union Ministry of Corporate Affairs on February 12, 2016.
Soon after the merger order was passed, FTIL, now known as 63 Moons, had approached the high court.
The government had said it was passing the merger order under section 396 of the Companies Act, 1956 after a Rs 5,600 -crore payment default rocked NSEL in July 2013.
Section 396 gives power to the central government to merge companies in public interest.
FTIL argued that with the merger order, the government sought to make FTIL responsible for the liabilities of the fraud-hit commodities bourse, NSEL.
FTIL counsels argued that use of section 396 in this way was illegal, considering that the liability of NSEL was yet to be established.
"If the power to amalgamate is being used to mulct (extract money from) shareholders and stakeholders of a parent company with putative liabilities of a subsidiary, it could only be done after existence of such a liability is established upon adjudication," an FTIL lawyer had argued.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)