HC upholds dismissal of Magistrate from judicial service

"It is hardly expected of a Judge to use the police machinery to get even with rivals," observed a division bench while hearing a petition filed by Chandrahas Mhatre, challenging his dismissal from the post of Magistrate in Kalyan on February 23 last year.

The Magistrate was dismissed after a departmental inquiry against him found him guilty of "misconduct" of influencing police to take action against his brother's political rivals.

The inquiry was ordered after receipt of a complaint by 417 persons from village Kalambusare in Uran alleging that the petitioner had been using his official position to support his brother who was involved in politics.

The complaint also alleged that he had called a meeting of the villagers of his group to instigate them to give false evidence against the rival group of his brother and that due to this behaviour, quarrels frequently took place among the villagers. It was alleged that the petitioner had prevailed upon police to register offence against villagers.

The petitioner was found guilty on two counts -- Firstly, in October 10, 2007, he visited Uran police station to lodge a complaint against his brother's rival group who had allegedly threatened his mother and brother.

Secondly, a year after the incident, he wrote a letter to Navi Mumbai Police Commissioner alleging illegal activities of his brother's rivals and seeking action against them stating that they had made a false complaint to the High Court against him. MORE

  

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

HC upholds dismissal of Magistrate from judicial service

Press Trust of India  |  Mumbai 



"It is hardly expected of a Judge to use the police machinery to get even with rivals," observed a division bench while hearing a petition filed by Chandrahas Mhatre, challenging his dismissal from the post of Magistrate in Kalyan on February 23 last year.

The Magistrate was dismissed after a departmental inquiry against him found him guilty of "misconduct" of influencing police to take action against his brother's political rivals.

The inquiry was ordered after receipt of a complaint by 417 persons from village Kalambusare in Uran alleging that the petitioner had been using his official position to support his brother who was involved in politics.

The complaint also alleged that he had called a meeting of the villagers of his group to instigate them to give false evidence against the rival group of his brother and that due to this behaviour, quarrels frequently took place among the villagers. It was alleged that the petitioner had prevailed upon police to register offence against villagers.

The petitioner was found guilty on two counts -- Firstly, in October 10, 2007, he visited Uran police station to lodge a complaint against his brother's rival group who had allegedly threatened his mother and brother.

Secondly, a year after the incident, he wrote a letter to Navi Mumbai Police Commissioner alleging illegal activities of his brother's rivals and seeking action against them stating that they had made a false complaint to the High Court against him. MORE

  

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

HC upholds dismissal of Magistrate from judicial service

The Bombay High Court has upheld dismissal of a Magistrate who was charged with trying to influence police to take action against political rivals of his brother in a village of Uran taluka in Raigad district.

"It is hardly expected of a Judge to use the police machinery to get even with rivals," observed a division bench while hearing a petition filed by Chandrahas Mhatre, challenging his dismissal from the post of Magistrate in Kalyan on February 23 last year.

The Magistrate was dismissed after a departmental inquiry against him found him guilty of "misconduct" of influencing police to take action against his brother's political rivals.

The inquiry was ordered after receipt of a complaint by 417 persons from village Kalambusare in Uran alleging that the petitioner had been using his official position to support his brother who was involved in politics.

The complaint also alleged that he had called a meeting of the villagers of his group to instigate them to give false evidence against the rival group of his brother and that due to this behaviour, quarrels frequently took place among the villagers. It was alleged that the petitioner had prevailed upon police to register offence against villagers.

The petitioner was found guilty on two counts -- Firstly, in October 10, 2007, he visited Uran police station to lodge a complaint against his brother's rival group who had allegedly threatened his mother and brother.

Secondly, a year after the incident, he wrote a letter to Navi Mumbai Police Commissioner alleging illegal activities of his brother's rivals and seeking action against them stating that they had made a false complaint to the High Court against him. MORE

  
image
Business Standard
177 22
Widgets Magazine

More News

Widgets Magazine
Widgets Magazine

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard