ALSO READAuthority under RERA not set up in Gujarat yet, says PIL SC seeks Gujarat govt reply on plea alleging RTE violation SC seeks Gujarat's reply on plea over re-induction of 2 cops Senior officers Amin, Barot resign from Gujarat police Tainted Gujarat cops' re-induction showed BJP govt's 'utter
The Gujarat High Court today sought the state government's response by November 16 on activist Teesta Setalvad's petition, seeking quashing of an FIR lodged against her in connection with the illegal exhumation of bodies of victims of the 2002 communal riots in the state.
Justice A J Desai issued a notice to the state government, seeking its response.
Setalvad approached the high court with the plea to quash the FIR as well as the chargesheet in the case after the Supreme Court refused to grant her any relief in the matter.
In July, the apex court had asked Setalvad to seek all the remedies, including quashing of the chargesheet filed on April 3, 2011, from the trial court or high court.
The case pertains to the illegal exhumation of unidentified bodies of the riot victims from Pandarwada and surrounding villages in the Panchmahal district of the state.
Earlier, the high court had declined to scrap the FIR against Setalvad, but allowed her application partly by quashing the summons, which had declared her as absconding.
Setalvad is the main accused in the case and was booked under sections 192 (fabricating false evidence), 193 (punishment for false evidence), 201 (causing disappearance of evidence), 120B (criminal conspiracy), 295(A) (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings) and 297 (trespassing on burial places) of the IPC.
It was alleged that in 2002, about 28 unidentified bodies of the riot victims from Pandarwada and surrounding villages in Khanpur taluka were buried in a graveyard.
Earlier, the Gujarat government, in an affidavit before the Supreme Court, had justified its probe against Setalvad in the case, saying she had actually planned and executed the digging of the graves, without any permission, in 2006.
It had also claimed that during the probe, it had emerged that "Teesta Setalvad, the petitioner herein, was the main accused, who actually planned and executed this operation of digging of graves near Pandarwada through her staff."
The government had alleged that the other accused had claimed innocence and blamed Setalvad for instigating them to carry out the exhumation, which is a penal offence.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)