ALSO READPradhan urges Uma to ask Chhattisgarh to open Kalma barrage Uma Bharti urged to ensure free flow of water in Mahanadi Ken-Betwa interlinking project to be launched soon: Uma Now silt from river to be used to construct roads: Uma Prez poll: CM Adityanath, dy cm Maurya, Uma Bharti cast ballot
The Centre has told the Supreme Court that the ongoing dispute between Odisha and Chhattisgarh over the Mahanadi river should be sorted out through negotiations between the concerned parties.
The Centre has also alleged that Odisha was not participating in the meetings relating to the issue and has not provided the requisite details, a lawyer representing one of the parties in the case said.
Another advocate representing Odisha in the case said that a written statement was filed yesterday by the Centre in the top court.
The lawyer said the Centre has told the court that they were in the process of finalising a bill to constitute a composite tribunal which would deal with all the inter-state river water disputes in the country.
The Inter-State River Water Disputes (Amendment) Bill 2017 was introduced in Lok Sabha by the Minister of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation Uma Bharti on March 14, 2017.
The Bill proposes to set up an Inter-State River Water Disputes Tribunal, for adjudication of water disputes, if a dispute is not resolved through the Disputes Resolution Committee.
The counsel said that the government has also told the apex court that the Mahanadi dispute should be resolved through discussion between the parties.
The Centre had in October told the apex court that it would take a decision on issuing a notification with regard to the dispute.
The Odisha government had moved the court in December last year seeking an order asking Chhattisgarh to stop its construction work in projects on the upstream of Mahanadi.
Odisha has been opposing Chhattisgarh's plans to build 13 barrages and seven pick up weirs (small dams) across the Mahanadi, in a plan to extract more water. Odisha has said this would adversely affect the interests of its farmers.
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)