You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

May set up Const bench for AAP govt's pleas after summer

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The requested the Supreme today to set up a five-judge Constitution bench at the earliest to decide its pleas challenging the High verdict that the Lieutenant Governor is the administrative head of the national capital territory.

A bench comprising Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justices and S K Kaul told senior advocate Gopal Subramaniam, appearing for the government, that it may consider setting up of the bench soon, "possibly" after the summer vacation.



Subramaniam mentioned the matter before the bench and said that the appeals have been referred to the CJI for setting up of a larger bench to deal with various constitutional issues.

The apex had on February 15 referred to a Constitution bench a batch of pleas filed by the against the high verdict, which had held that is not a state and that the Lieutenant Governor (LG) is its administrative head.

The top had said that important questions of law and the Constitution are involved in the matter and it should be adjudicated upon by a Constitution Bench.

However, it did not frame questions to be deliberated upon by the Constitution bench in the matter and had asked the Centre and the to argue their case before the larger bench.

The had on February 2 told the that it has exclusive executive powers in relation to matters falling within the purview of the Legislative Assembly and neither the Centre nor the President or the can encroach upon these.

The apex had said that it was correct that the elected should have some powers but whether it would be as per the High verdict or as it was being perceived by the needed to be looked into.

The city had told the bench that the of National Capital Territory of (GNCTD), except for public order, land and police, possesses exclusive powers in relation to all other entries in State and Concurrent lists of the Constitution and that neither the central nor the President or the has any role or power with regard to all other matters.

"We are seeking only the special status as contemplated under Article 239AA of the Constitution. It is a narrow issue but requires interpretation. We need to see what are the limitation and amplitude of the LG's power under the Article 239AA," it had said.

The Constitution has given a face and identity to a in after inclusion of Article 239AA and the executive decisions taken and implemented by it cannot be reversed by the LG, it had contended.

The had said that the cannot exercise its power with respect to services as it does not fall under the purview of the Centre under the State list.

The had said that since the law rules out the LG's discretion on all matters that fall within the purview of the elected government, there is no occasion for him to differ or have an opinion on these matters.

The apex had on December 14 observed that the should have some powers otherwise it cannot function while hearing the appeals of the city

On September 9, the apex had refused to grant an interim stay on the verdict of the High of August 4 last year.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

May set up Const bench for AAP govt's pleas after summer

The Delhi government requested the Supreme Court today to set up a five-judge Constitution bench at the earliest to decide its pleas challenging the Delhi High Court verdict that the Lieutenant Governor is the administrative head of the national capital territory. A bench comprising Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justices D Y Chandrachud and S K Kaul told senior advocate Gopal Subramaniam, appearing for the Delhi government, that it may consider setting up of the bench soon, "possibly" after the summer vacation. Subramaniam mentioned the matter before the bench and said that the appeals have been referred to the CJI for setting up of a larger bench to deal with various constitutional issues. The apex court had on February 15 referred to a Constitution bench a batch of pleas filed by the AAP government against the high court verdict, which had held that Delhi is not a state and that the Lieutenant Governor (LG) is its administrative head. The top court had said that important ... The requested the Supreme today to set up a five-judge Constitution bench at the earliest to decide its pleas challenging the High verdict that the Lieutenant Governor is the administrative head of the national capital territory.

A bench comprising Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justices and S K Kaul told senior advocate Gopal Subramaniam, appearing for the government, that it may consider setting up of the bench soon, "possibly" after the summer vacation.

Subramaniam mentioned the matter before the bench and said that the appeals have been referred to the CJI for setting up of a larger bench to deal with various constitutional issues.

The apex had on February 15 referred to a Constitution bench a batch of pleas filed by the against the high verdict, which had held that is not a state and that the Lieutenant Governor (LG) is its administrative head.

The top had said that important questions of law and the Constitution are involved in the matter and it should be adjudicated upon by a Constitution Bench.

However, it did not frame questions to be deliberated upon by the Constitution bench in the matter and had asked the Centre and the to argue their case before the larger bench.

The had on February 2 told the that it has exclusive executive powers in relation to matters falling within the purview of the Legislative Assembly and neither the Centre nor the President or the can encroach upon these.

The apex had said that it was correct that the elected should have some powers but whether it would be as per the High verdict or as it was being perceived by the needed to be looked into.

The city had told the bench that the of National Capital Territory of (GNCTD), except for public order, land and police, possesses exclusive powers in relation to all other entries in State and Concurrent lists of the Constitution and that neither the central nor the President or the has any role or power with regard to all other matters.

"We are seeking only the special status as contemplated under Article 239AA of the Constitution. It is a narrow issue but requires interpretation. We need to see what are the limitation and amplitude of the LG's power under the Article 239AA," it had said.

The Constitution has given a face and identity to a in after inclusion of Article 239AA and the executive decisions taken and implemented by it cannot be reversed by the LG, it had contended.

The had said that the cannot exercise its power with respect to services as it does not fall under the purview of the Centre under the State list.

The had said that since the law rules out the LG's discretion on all matters that fall within the purview of the elected government, there is no occasion for him to differ or have an opinion on these matters.

The apex had on December 14 observed that the should have some powers otherwise it cannot function while hearing the appeals of the city

On September 9, the apex had refused to grant an interim stay on the verdict of the High of August 4 last year.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

May set up Const bench for AAP govt's pleas after summer

The requested the Supreme today to set up a five-judge Constitution bench at the earliest to decide its pleas challenging the High verdict that the Lieutenant Governor is the administrative head of the national capital territory.

A bench comprising Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justices and S K Kaul told senior advocate Gopal Subramaniam, appearing for the government, that it may consider setting up of the bench soon, "possibly" after the summer vacation.

Subramaniam mentioned the matter before the bench and said that the appeals have been referred to the CJI for setting up of a larger bench to deal with various constitutional issues.

The apex had on February 15 referred to a Constitution bench a batch of pleas filed by the against the high verdict, which had held that is not a state and that the Lieutenant Governor (LG) is its administrative head.

The top had said that important questions of law and the Constitution are involved in the matter and it should be adjudicated upon by a Constitution Bench.

However, it did not frame questions to be deliberated upon by the Constitution bench in the matter and had asked the Centre and the to argue their case before the larger bench.

The had on February 2 told the that it has exclusive executive powers in relation to matters falling within the purview of the Legislative Assembly and neither the Centre nor the President or the can encroach upon these.

The apex had said that it was correct that the elected should have some powers but whether it would be as per the High verdict or as it was being perceived by the needed to be looked into.

The city had told the bench that the of National Capital Territory of (GNCTD), except for public order, land and police, possesses exclusive powers in relation to all other entries in State and Concurrent lists of the Constitution and that neither the central nor the President or the has any role or power with regard to all other matters.

"We are seeking only the special status as contemplated under Article 239AA of the Constitution. It is a narrow issue but requires interpretation. We need to see what are the limitation and amplitude of the LG's power under the Article 239AA," it had said.

The Constitution has given a face and identity to a in after inclusion of Article 239AA and the executive decisions taken and implemented by it cannot be reversed by the LG, it had contended.

The had said that the cannot exercise its power with respect to services as it does not fall under the purview of the Centre under the State list.

The had said that since the law rules out the LG's discretion on all matters that fall within the purview of the elected government, there is no occasion for him to differ or have an opinion on these matters.

The apex had on December 14 observed that the should have some powers otherwise it cannot function while hearing the appeals of the city

On September 9, the apex had refused to grant an interim stay on the verdict of the High of August 4 last year.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22