You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Old-age pension scheme:Court junks plea against BJP councillor

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

A special has dismissed a criminal complaint against a councillor and six public servants seeking their prosecution for allegedly cheating MCD of Rs 4 crore in a pension scheme for elderly, destitute and widows.

The rejected a man's plea seeking lodging of an FIR against 51 persons, including Pawan Singh Rathee, Councillor from Madhu Vihar in southwest Delhi, and six government officials, due to lack of a valid sanction to prosecute public servants.



"...In complaint case filed against a public servant when there was no previous sanction the magistrate cannot order investigation by invoking section 156(3) of the CrPC. Thus the contention of counsel for complainant that at the stage of exercise of power under section 156(3) of the CrPC, sanction was not required is without merit. Once there is no previous sanction a magistrate cannot order investigation by invoking power under section 156(3) of the CrPC.

"Thus, if the requires sanction for proceedings against public servant, the cannot entertain a complaint against the public servants without a valid sanction for their prosecution," Special Judge Poonam Chaudhry said.

The complaint was filed by Uttam Nagar-resident Chetan Prakash against Rathee, Joint Commissioner of Anti Corruption Branch, Deputy Commissioner of MCD of Najafgarh Zone, and four other officials of MCD.

The complainant alleged that around 700 pension holders who were getting benefit of pension/stipend under the 'Old Age Destitute' scheme were not entitled to it.

It alleged that Rathee and MCD officers in connivance with some pension holders fabricated documents certifying that they were entitled to get pension under the 'Old Age/Destitute Pension Scheme' and the councillor by indulging in corrupt practices has caused wrongful loss of Rs 4 crore to MCD.

The plea further said that the destitute persons, who should actually be entitled to the benefit under the scheme, were struggling for their livelihood whereas unscrupulous persons were reaping the benefit.

It alleged that Rathee, who was the Chairman of Najafgarh Zone from 2014 to 2015, was taking half of the pension amount from the pensioners every month.

The plea claimed that it had given the complaint before to the deputy commissioner, Najafgarh Zone, South Municipal Corporation (SDMC), but no action was taken.

The dismissed the plea saying allegations against the seven public servants are for offences of forgery, using forged documents as genuine, cheating and criminal conspiracy under the IPC and under the Prevention of Corruption Act and "sanction to prosecute them is mandatory for proceeding against them".

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Old-age pension scheme:Court junks plea against BJP councillor

A special court has dismissed a criminal complaint against a BJP councillor and six public servants seeking their prosecution for allegedly cheating MCD of Rs 4 crore in a pension scheme for elderly, destitute and widows. The court rejected a man's plea seeking lodging of an FIR against 51 persons, including Pawan Singh Rathee, Councillor from Madhu Vihar in southwest Delhi, and six government officials, due to lack of a valid sanction to prosecute public servants. "...In complaint case filed against a public servant when there was no previous sanction the magistrate cannot order investigation by invoking section 156(3) of the CrPC. Thus the contention of counsel for complainant that at the stage of exercise of power under section 156(3) of the CrPC, sanction was not required is without merit. Once there is no previous sanction a magistrate cannot order investigation by invoking power under section 156(3) of the CrPC. "Thus, if the law requires sanction for proceedings against ... A special has dismissed a criminal complaint against a councillor and six public servants seeking their prosecution for allegedly cheating MCD of Rs 4 crore in a pension scheme for elderly, destitute and widows.

The rejected a man's plea seeking lodging of an FIR against 51 persons, including Pawan Singh Rathee, Councillor from Madhu Vihar in southwest Delhi, and six government officials, due to lack of a valid sanction to prosecute public servants.

"...In complaint case filed against a public servant when there was no previous sanction the magistrate cannot order investigation by invoking section 156(3) of the CrPC. Thus the contention of counsel for complainant that at the stage of exercise of power under section 156(3) of the CrPC, sanction was not required is without merit. Once there is no previous sanction a magistrate cannot order investigation by invoking power under section 156(3) of the CrPC.

"Thus, if the requires sanction for proceedings against public servant, the cannot entertain a complaint against the public servants without a valid sanction for their prosecution," Special Judge Poonam Chaudhry said.

The complaint was filed by Uttam Nagar-resident Chetan Prakash against Rathee, Joint Commissioner of Anti Corruption Branch, Deputy Commissioner of MCD of Najafgarh Zone, and four other officials of MCD.

The complainant alleged that around 700 pension holders who were getting benefit of pension/stipend under the 'Old Age Destitute' scheme were not entitled to it.

It alleged that Rathee and MCD officers in connivance with some pension holders fabricated documents certifying that they were entitled to get pension under the 'Old Age/Destitute Pension Scheme' and the councillor by indulging in corrupt practices has caused wrongful loss of Rs 4 crore to MCD.

The plea further said that the destitute persons, who should actually be entitled to the benefit under the scheme, were struggling for their livelihood whereas unscrupulous persons were reaping the benefit.

It alleged that Rathee, who was the Chairman of Najafgarh Zone from 2014 to 2015, was taking half of the pension amount from the pensioners every month.

The plea claimed that it had given the complaint before to the deputy commissioner, Najafgarh Zone, South Municipal Corporation (SDMC), but no action was taken.

The dismissed the plea saying allegations against the seven public servants are for offences of forgery, using forged documents as genuine, cheating and criminal conspiracy under the IPC and under the Prevention of Corruption Act and "sanction to prosecute them is mandatory for proceeding against them".

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Old-age pension scheme:Court junks plea against BJP councillor

A special has dismissed a criminal complaint against a councillor and six public servants seeking their prosecution for allegedly cheating MCD of Rs 4 crore in a pension scheme for elderly, destitute and widows.

The rejected a man's plea seeking lodging of an FIR against 51 persons, including Pawan Singh Rathee, Councillor from Madhu Vihar in southwest Delhi, and six government officials, due to lack of a valid sanction to prosecute public servants.

"...In complaint case filed against a public servant when there was no previous sanction the magistrate cannot order investigation by invoking section 156(3) of the CrPC. Thus the contention of counsel for complainant that at the stage of exercise of power under section 156(3) of the CrPC, sanction was not required is without merit. Once there is no previous sanction a magistrate cannot order investigation by invoking power under section 156(3) of the CrPC.

"Thus, if the requires sanction for proceedings against public servant, the cannot entertain a complaint against the public servants without a valid sanction for their prosecution," Special Judge Poonam Chaudhry said.

The complaint was filed by Uttam Nagar-resident Chetan Prakash against Rathee, Joint Commissioner of Anti Corruption Branch, Deputy Commissioner of MCD of Najafgarh Zone, and four other officials of MCD.

The complainant alleged that around 700 pension holders who were getting benefit of pension/stipend under the 'Old Age Destitute' scheme were not entitled to it.

It alleged that Rathee and MCD officers in connivance with some pension holders fabricated documents certifying that they were entitled to get pension under the 'Old Age/Destitute Pension Scheme' and the councillor by indulging in corrupt practices has caused wrongful loss of Rs 4 crore to MCD.

The plea further said that the destitute persons, who should actually be entitled to the benefit under the scheme, were struggling for their livelihood whereas unscrupulous persons were reaping the benefit.

It alleged that Rathee, who was the Chairman of Najafgarh Zone from 2014 to 2015, was taking half of the pension amount from the pensioners every month.

The plea claimed that it had given the complaint before to the deputy commissioner, Najafgarh Zone, South Municipal Corporation (SDMC), but no action was taken.

The dismissed the plea saying allegations against the seven public servants are for offences of forgery, using forged documents as genuine, cheating and criminal conspiracy under the IPC and under the Prevention of Corruption Act and "sanction to prosecute them is mandatory for proceeding against them".

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard