You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Ossification test can't be considered "conclusive": SC

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Ossification test cannot be considered as "conclusive" to ascertain the age of a person, the Supreme has said while dismissing the juvenility plea of two accused in a criminal case.

The apex said a "blind and mechanical view" on the age of a person cannot be adopted solely on the basis of medical opinion by radiological examination.



"Courts have taken judicial notice of this fact and have always held that the evidence afforded by radiological examination is no doubt a useful guiding factor for determining the age of a person but the evidence is not of a conclusive and incontrovertible nature and it is subject to a margin of error.

"Medical evidence as to the age of a person though a very useful guiding factor is not conclusive and has to be considered along with other circumstances," a bench of justices A K Sikri and R Banumathi said.

The findings came in a case in which the crime was committed in 1994 and the trial had convicted the two persons in 1995 for the offence of murder which was upheld by the Allahabad High Court.

The apex also cited previous judgements and observed that the purpose of Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 is not to give shelter to the accused of "grave and heinous offences".

"... We hold that ossification test cannot be regarded as conclusive when it comes to ascertaining the age of a person," the bench said, adding that the two convicts have now crossed the age of 30 years which is an important factor to be taken into account as age cannot be determined with precision.

"In the present case, their physical, dental and radiological examinations were carried out. Radiological examination of skull (AP and lateral view), sternum (AP and lateral view) and sacrum (lateral view) was advised and performed.

"As per the medical report, there was no indication for dental x-rays since both the accused were much beyond 25 years of age. Therefore, the age determination based on ossification test though may be useful is not conclusive. An X-ray ossification test can by no means be so infallible and accurate a test as to indicate the correct number of years and days of a person's life," the bench said.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Ossification test can't be considered "conclusive": SC

Ossification test cannot be considered as "conclusive" to ascertain the age of a person, the Supreme Court has said while dismissing the juvenility plea of two accused in a criminal case. The apex court said a "blind and mechanical view" on the age of a person cannot be adopted solely on the basis of medical opinion by radiological examination. "Courts have taken judicial notice of this fact and have always held that the evidence afforded by radiological examination is no doubt a useful guiding factor for determining the age of a person but the evidence is not of a conclusive and incontrovertible nature and it is subject to a margin of error. "Medical evidence as to the age of a person though a very useful guiding factor is not conclusive and has to be considered along with other circumstances," a bench of justices A K Sikri and R Banumathi said. The findings came in a case in which the crime was committed in 1994 and the trial court had convicted the two persons in 1995 for the ... Ossification test cannot be considered as "conclusive" to ascertain the age of a person, the Supreme has said while dismissing the juvenility plea of two accused in a criminal case.

The apex said a "blind and mechanical view" on the age of a person cannot be adopted solely on the basis of medical opinion by radiological examination.

"Courts have taken judicial notice of this fact and have always held that the evidence afforded by radiological examination is no doubt a useful guiding factor for determining the age of a person but the evidence is not of a conclusive and incontrovertible nature and it is subject to a margin of error.

"Medical evidence as to the age of a person though a very useful guiding factor is not conclusive and has to be considered along with other circumstances," a bench of justices A K Sikri and R Banumathi said.

The findings came in a case in which the crime was committed in 1994 and the trial had convicted the two persons in 1995 for the offence of murder which was upheld by the Allahabad High Court.

The apex also cited previous judgements and observed that the purpose of Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 is not to give shelter to the accused of "grave and heinous offences".

"... We hold that ossification test cannot be regarded as conclusive when it comes to ascertaining the age of a person," the bench said, adding that the two convicts have now crossed the age of 30 years which is an important factor to be taken into account as age cannot be determined with precision.

"In the present case, their physical, dental and radiological examinations were carried out. Radiological examination of skull (AP and lateral view), sternum (AP and lateral view) and sacrum (lateral view) was advised and performed.

"As per the medical report, there was no indication for dental x-rays since both the accused were much beyond 25 years of age. Therefore, the age determination based on ossification test though may be useful is not conclusive. An X-ray ossification test can by no means be so infallible and accurate a test as to indicate the correct number of years and days of a person's life," the bench said.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Ossification test can't be considered "conclusive": SC

Ossification test cannot be considered as "conclusive" to ascertain the age of a person, the Supreme has said while dismissing the juvenility plea of two accused in a criminal case.

The apex said a "blind and mechanical view" on the age of a person cannot be adopted solely on the basis of medical opinion by radiological examination.

"Courts have taken judicial notice of this fact and have always held that the evidence afforded by radiological examination is no doubt a useful guiding factor for determining the age of a person but the evidence is not of a conclusive and incontrovertible nature and it is subject to a margin of error.

"Medical evidence as to the age of a person though a very useful guiding factor is not conclusive and has to be considered along with other circumstances," a bench of justices A K Sikri and R Banumathi said.

The findings came in a case in which the crime was committed in 1994 and the trial had convicted the two persons in 1995 for the offence of murder which was upheld by the Allahabad High Court.

The apex also cited previous judgements and observed that the purpose of Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 is not to give shelter to the accused of "grave and heinous offences".

"... We hold that ossification test cannot be regarded as conclusive when it comes to ascertaining the age of a person," the bench said, adding that the two convicts have now crossed the age of 30 years which is an important factor to be taken into account as age cannot be determined with precision.

"In the present case, their physical, dental and radiological examinations were carried out. Radiological examination of skull (AP and lateral view), sternum (AP and lateral view) and sacrum (lateral view) was advised and performed.

"As per the medical report, there was no indication for dental x-rays since both the accused were much beyond 25 years of age. Therefore, the age determination based on ossification test though may be useful is not conclusive. An X-ray ossification test can by no means be so infallible and accurate a test as to indicate the correct number of years and days of a person's life," the bench said.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard