You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Property developer must respect contractual commitment: SC

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Unitech Resorts Ltd was today directed by the Supreme to refund Rs 15 crore to 39 home buyers in its Gurgaon project, saying a property developer must respect the contractual commitment and live up to the terms of the contract.

The apex while directing Unitech Resorts Ltd to deposit Rs 2 crore in four weeks with Supreme registry said the firm by "delaying or procrastinating" the completion of the flats cannot base its stand on "excuses or any subterfuge" to advance the stand that constructions take time.



"It needs no special emphasis to state that the property developer has to respect the contractual commitment. It has to live up to the terms of the contract and gain trust so that the people who dream of houses can repose faith in him. Not for nothing, it has been said, 'the foundation of any economy is faith and if faith is lost, everything is lost'.

"True it is, there is a saying, 'was not built in a day' but it is in the realm of metaphor," a bench of Justices Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy and A M Khanwilkar said.

The bench noted that Rs 16.55 crore was deposited by the 39 home buyers who had booked flats in Unitech Vista project in sector-70, Gurgaon and are before the court.

It also noted that the company has deposited Rs 15 crore with apex registry in compliance with an earlier order.

"As Rs 15 crore has been invested and some interest has accrued, let the same be given to the respondents (home buyers) on pro rata basis on proper identification by the counsel.

"The appellant company is directed to deposit a further sum of Rs 2 crore within four weeks hence," the bench said and posted the matter for further hearing on January 11, 2017.

The apex said, "the appellant (Unitech) by delaying or procrastinating the completion of the flats cannot base its stand on excuses or any subterfuge to advance the stand that the constructions take time".

The apex clarified that the aspect of interest and compensation payable to the home buyers for the delay in giving the flats on part of the company will be deliberated at a later stage.
Taking the real estate company to task for saying

construction takes time, the apex said "the submission ... Rests upon the metaphor that 'was not built in a day' but serves no purpose. It is flat or money. And nothing else."

"The respondents (home buyers) collectively make a demand for refund of money because they have fought the litigation with ceaseless vigour and enormous hope," it said.

The bench, which heard the grievances of some of the home buyers who were present during the hearing, recorded their anguish and said, "the voice of anguish is echoed in the room as they say their dreams have been shattered and they have been constrained to pave the path of impecuniosity".

The home buyers, through advocate Brajesh Kumar, refused to accept the proposal given by senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Unitech, that three towers will be completed by end of April 2017 and some of them will be given flats along with some amount as directed by the court.

He said that Rs 5 crore deposited by the company with the apex be distributed among the purchasers towards principal amount and flats be handed over by April 2017.

Singhvi said the remaining Rs 10 crore deposited with the apex should be given back to the company for facilitating the construction.

The flat-buyers who were present in the room and through lawyers outrightly rejected the proposal and demanded refund, along with interest and compensation.

The apex had on August 17, directed the embattled real estate firm to deposit Rs 15 crore principal amount by September-end to pay back investors and home buyers who were not given possession of the flats on time.

Investors have told the that they had paid money to the firm on time and the company was scheduled to hand over the possession of flats in 2012 but has not done till date.

Over two dozen home buyers of Unitech's housing projects in Noida and Gurgaon had approached the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) after the builder had failed to give them possession of the flats as per schedule.

The consumer forum had asked Unitech to refund the money to the home buyers with interest.

The apex had earlier asked the company to deposit an interim penalty of Rs 5 crore with the registry after the firm challenged the order of the consumer forum which had asked the developer to pay Rs 5 crore penalty to three buyers of its Burgundy project.

The had said the penalty deposited with the will be awarded to the buyers or returned to Unitech, depending on the outcome of the case.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Property developer must respect contractual commitment: SC

Unitech Resorts Ltd was today directed by the Supreme Court to refund Rs 15 crore to 39 home buyers in its Gurgaon project, saying a property developer must respect the contractual commitment and live up to the terms of the contract. The apex court while directing Unitech Resorts Ltd to deposit Rs 2 crore in four weeks with Supreme Court registry said the firm by "delaying or procrastinating" the completion of the flats cannot base its stand on "excuses or any subterfuge" to advance the stand that constructions take time. "It needs no special emphasis to state that the property developer has to respect the contractual commitment. It has to live up to the terms of the contract and gain trust so that the people who dream of houses can repose faith in him. Not for nothing, it has been said, 'the foundation of any economy is faith and if faith is lost, everything is lost'. "True it is, there is a saying, 'Rome was not built in a day' but it is in the realm of metaphor," a bench of ... Unitech Resorts Ltd was today directed by the Supreme to refund Rs 15 crore to 39 home buyers in its Gurgaon project, saying a property developer must respect the contractual commitment and live up to the terms of the contract.

The apex while directing Unitech Resorts Ltd to deposit Rs 2 crore in four weeks with Supreme registry said the firm by "delaying or procrastinating" the completion of the flats cannot base its stand on "excuses or any subterfuge" to advance the stand that constructions take time.

"It needs no special emphasis to state that the property developer has to respect the contractual commitment. It has to live up to the terms of the contract and gain trust so that the people who dream of houses can repose faith in him. Not for nothing, it has been said, 'the foundation of any economy is faith and if faith is lost, everything is lost'.

"True it is, there is a saying, 'was not built in a day' but it is in the realm of metaphor," a bench of Justices Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy and A M Khanwilkar said.

The bench noted that Rs 16.55 crore was deposited by the 39 home buyers who had booked flats in Unitech Vista project in sector-70, Gurgaon and are before the court.

It also noted that the company has deposited Rs 15 crore with apex registry in compliance with an earlier order.

"As Rs 15 crore has been invested and some interest has accrued, let the same be given to the respondents (home buyers) on pro rata basis on proper identification by the counsel.

"The appellant company is directed to deposit a further sum of Rs 2 crore within four weeks hence," the bench said and posted the matter for further hearing on January 11, 2017.

The apex said, "the appellant (Unitech) by delaying or procrastinating the completion of the flats cannot base its stand on excuses or any subterfuge to advance the stand that the constructions take time".

The apex clarified that the aspect of interest and compensation payable to the home buyers for the delay in giving the flats on part of the company will be deliberated at a later stage.
Taking the real estate company to task for saying

construction takes time, the apex said "the submission ... Rests upon the metaphor that 'was not built in a day' but serves no purpose. It is flat or money. And nothing else."

"The respondents (home buyers) collectively make a demand for refund of money because they have fought the litigation with ceaseless vigour and enormous hope," it said.

The bench, which heard the grievances of some of the home buyers who were present during the hearing, recorded their anguish and said, "the voice of anguish is echoed in the room as they say their dreams have been shattered and they have been constrained to pave the path of impecuniosity".

The home buyers, through advocate Brajesh Kumar, refused to accept the proposal given by senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Unitech, that three towers will be completed by end of April 2017 and some of them will be given flats along with some amount as directed by the court.

He said that Rs 5 crore deposited by the company with the apex be distributed among the purchasers towards principal amount and flats be handed over by April 2017.

Singhvi said the remaining Rs 10 crore deposited with the apex should be given back to the company for facilitating the construction.

The flat-buyers who were present in the room and through lawyers outrightly rejected the proposal and demanded refund, along with interest and compensation.

The apex had on August 17, directed the embattled real estate firm to deposit Rs 15 crore principal amount by September-end to pay back investors and home buyers who were not given possession of the flats on time.

Investors have told the that they had paid money to the firm on time and the company was scheduled to hand over the possession of flats in 2012 but has not done till date.

Over two dozen home buyers of Unitech's housing projects in Noida and Gurgaon had approached the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) after the builder had failed to give them possession of the flats as per schedule.

The consumer forum had asked Unitech to refund the money to the home buyers with interest.

The apex had earlier asked the company to deposit an interim penalty of Rs 5 crore with the registry after the firm challenged the order of the consumer forum which had asked the developer to pay Rs 5 crore penalty to three buyers of its Burgundy project.

The had said the penalty deposited with the will be awarded to the buyers or returned to Unitech, depending on the outcome of the case.
image
Business Standard
177 22

Property developer must respect contractual commitment: SC

Unitech Resorts Ltd was today directed by the Supreme to refund Rs 15 crore to 39 home buyers in its Gurgaon project, saying a property developer must respect the contractual commitment and live up to the terms of the contract.

The apex while directing Unitech Resorts Ltd to deposit Rs 2 crore in four weeks with Supreme registry said the firm by "delaying or procrastinating" the completion of the flats cannot base its stand on "excuses or any subterfuge" to advance the stand that constructions take time.

"It needs no special emphasis to state that the property developer has to respect the contractual commitment. It has to live up to the terms of the contract and gain trust so that the people who dream of houses can repose faith in him. Not for nothing, it has been said, 'the foundation of any economy is faith and if faith is lost, everything is lost'.

"True it is, there is a saying, 'was not built in a day' but it is in the realm of metaphor," a bench of Justices Dipak Misra, Amitava Roy and A M Khanwilkar said.

The bench noted that Rs 16.55 crore was deposited by the 39 home buyers who had booked flats in Unitech Vista project in sector-70, Gurgaon and are before the court.

It also noted that the company has deposited Rs 15 crore with apex registry in compliance with an earlier order.

"As Rs 15 crore has been invested and some interest has accrued, let the same be given to the respondents (home buyers) on pro rata basis on proper identification by the counsel.

"The appellant company is directed to deposit a further sum of Rs 2 crore within four weeks hence," the bench said and posted the matter for further hearing on January 11, 2017.

The apex said, "the appellant (Unitech) by delaying or procrastinating the completion of the flats cannot base its stand on excuses or any subterfuge to advance the stand that the constructions take time".

The apex clarified that the aspect of interest and compensation payable to the home buyers for the delay in giving the flats on part of the company will be deliberated at a later stage.
Taking the real estate company to task for saying

construction takes time, the apex said "the submission ... Rests upon the metaphor that 'was not built in a day' but serves no purpose. It is flat or money. And nothing else."

"The respondents (home buyers) collectively make a demand for refund of money because they have fought the litigation with ceaseless vigour and enormous hope," it said.

The bench, which heard the grievances of some of the home buyers who were present during the hearing, recorded their anguish and said, "the voice of anguish is echoed in the room as they say their dreams have been shattered and they have been constrained to pave the path of impecuniosity".

The home buyers, through advocate Brajesh Kumar, refused to accept the proposal given by senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Unitech, that three towers will be completed by end of April 2017 and some of them will be given flats along with some amount as directed by the court.

He said that Rs 5 crore deposited by the company with the apex be distributed among the purchasers towards principal amount and flats be handed over by April 2017.

Singhvi said the remaining Rs 10 crore deposited with the apex should be given back to the company for facilitating the construction.

The flat-buyers who were present in the room and through lawyers outrightly rejected the proposal and demanded refund, along with interest and compensation.

The apex had on August 17, directed the embattled real estate firm to deposit Rs 15 crore principal amount by September-end to pay back investors and home buyers who were not given possession of the flats on time.

Investors have told the that they had paid money to the firm on time and the company was scheduled to hand over the possession of flats in 2012 but has not done till date.

Over two dozen home buyers of Unitech's housing projects in Noida and Gurgaon had approached the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) after the builder had failed to give them possession of the flats as per schedule.

The consumer forum had asked Unitech to refund the money to the home buyers with interest.

The apex had earlier asked the company to deposit an interim penalty of Rs 5 crore with the registry after the firm challenged the order of the consumer forum which had asked the developer to pay Rs 5 crore penalty to three buyers of its Burgundy project.

The had said the penalty deposited with the will be awarded to the buyers or returned to Unitech, depending on the outcome of the case.

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard