You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Racial violence agnst NE people: SC differs with govt views

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The Supreme has expressed disagreement with the Centre that the prevailing penal provisions were good enough to cover the issue of hate crimes and racial violence, especially against the people of North Eastern states.

"No, it does not," reacted a bench comprising Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justices A M Khanwilkar and when the Centre, while expressing reluctance to suggestions for a specific legislation, said sections 153 A and B of (IPC) covered anti-racial issues.



"The examination is going on whether specific legislation is required or not as the provisions of the covers everything and it would be wrong to say it does not cover it," Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh said.

He said section 153 B covers everything and the could "examine" it. "We will assist you. If you are not satisfied, we will replace it with a new law," he said.

The deliberations were going on in the background of the recommendation of M P Bezbaruah committee which suggested amendment in sections 153 A and 153 B of the as a long- term measure to deal with the issue of racial violence.

While the officer was trying to make his submission on the recommendation of Bezbaruah committee, which set up by the Ministry of Home Ministry (MHA) on February 5, 2014 after several incidents of hate crimes against persons hailing from the Northeast, the bench expressed displeasure that effective steps were not being taken to address the issues.

"Nothing is on record to show what steps have been taken. We are not going to take what is there in the affidavit," the bench said, adding "legislation is one part of the recommendations".

The bench, which posted the matter for hearing on Friday, wanted to know from the Centre whether any steps have been taken to set up a nodal agency to monitor the complaints and related issues.

"A pro-active work has to be undertaken. What type of programme has to be there? Call your 'babus' and tell them. We have to pass an order. We can't issue ominous type of directions," the bench said stressing that there should be a nodal agency to address the issues of the Northeastern people.
The bench said there was a need to have a nodal agency,

as at the time of need, it would be asked whom to catch to implement the measures as there would also be the requirement of coordination with various departments.

The bench said the Bezbaruah committee had made several immediate and short term measures along with long term measures and all this should not remain only on paper.

"The people of Northeast are (staying) in large numbers in Delhi, Pune, Bangalore etc which are educational hub. You identify those areas where these people are in large numbers," the bench said, adding it is not visible whether any such nodal agency was working.

The ASG said he will get back on all the issues raised by the bench and made a mention of steps already taken in the national capital to address the issues of the Northeastern people and what could be the best mechanism.

Earlier too, the was informed that incorporation of has to be done by Parliament and the Centre has to take steps.

The bench, which has been hearing a batch of PILs filed in 2014 following several incidents of hate crimes in Delhi against persons hailing from Northeast, had also said that India had signed International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination way back in 1965.

The Bezbaruah panel was set up by MHA on February 5, 2014, to suggest "suitable remedial measures" which could be taken, in the wake of attacks on the people from the Northeast in Delhi and other parts of the country including the death of youth Nido Tania, a student from Arunachal Pradesh.

The petition filed by Karma Dorjee and others had said that Bezbaruah panel had recommended changes in the to curb and punish incidents of racial violence targeting people from Northeast region.

The had issued notice to the Centre on PILs seeking its direction to them to frame guideline to protect the people from Northeastern states in various parts of the country against alleged racial discrimination.

The petitions had alleged that people from Northeastern region, who move out of their states in search of better opportunities for studies and jobs, were subjected to racial taunts and violence on a daily basis due to their physical appearance at the hands of people of their own country.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Racial violence agnst NE people: SC differs with govt views

The Supreme Court has expressed disagreement with the Centre that the prevailing penal provisions were good enough to cover the issue of hate crimes and racial violence, especially against the people of North Eastern states. "No, it does not," reacted a bench comprising Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud when the Centre, while expressing reluctance to suggestions for a specific legislation, said sections 153 A and B of Indian Penal Code (IPC) covered anti-racial issues. "The examination is going on whether specific legislation is required or not as the provisions of the IPC covers everything and it would be wrong to say it does not cover it," Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh said. He said section 153 B IPC covers everything and the court could "examine" it. "We will assist you. If you are not satisfied, we will replace it with a new law," he said. The deliberations were going on in the background of the recommendation of M P ... The Supreme has expressed disagreement with the Centre that the prevailing penal provisions were good enough to cover the issue of hate crimes and racial violence, especially against the people of North Eastern states.

"No, it does not," reacted a bench comprising Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justices A M Khanwilkar and when the Centre, while expressing reluctance to suggestions for a specific legislation, said sections 153 A and B of (IPC) covered anti-racial issues.

"The examination is going on whether specific legislation is required or not as the provisions of the covers everything and it would be wrong to say it does not cover it," Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh said.

He said section 153 B covers everything and the could "examine" it. "We will assist you. If you are not satisfied, we will replace it with a new law," he said.

The deliberations were going on in the background of the recommendation of M P Bezbaruah committee which suggested amendment in sections 153 A and 153 B of the as a long- term measure to deal with the issue of racial violence.

While the officer was trying to make his submission on the recommendation of Bezbaruah committee, which set up by the Ministry of Home Ministry (MHA) on February 5, 2014 after several incidents of hate crimes against persons hailing from the Northeast, the bench expressed displeasure that effective steps were not being taken to address the issues.

"Nothing is on record to show what steps have been taken. We are not going to take what is there in the affidavit," the bench said, adding "legislation is one part of the recommendations".

The bench, which posted the matter for hearing on Friday, wanted to know from the Centre whether any steps have been taken to set up a nodal agency to monitor the complaints and related issues.

"A pro-active work has to be undertaken. What type of programme has to be there? Call your 'babus' and tell them. We have to pass an order. We can't issue ominous type of directions," the bench said stressing that there should be a nodal agency to address the issues of the Northeastern people.
The bench said there was a need to have a nodal agency,

as at the time of need, it would be asked whom to catch to implement the measures as there would also be the requirement of coordination with various departments.

The bench said the Bezbaruah committee had made several immediate and short term measures along with long term measures and all this should not remain only on paper.

"The people of Northeast are (staying) in large numbers in Delhi, Pune, Bangalore etc which are educational hub. You identify those areas where these people are in large numbers," the bench said, adding it is not visible whether any such nodal agency was working.

The ASG said he will get back on all the issues raised by the bench and made a mention of steps already taken in the national capital to address the issues of the Northeastern people and what could be the best mechanism.

Earlier too, the was informed that incorporation of has to be done by Parliament and the Centre has to take steps.

The bench, which has been hearing a batch of PILs filed in 2014 following several incidents of hate crimes in Delhi against persons hailing from Northeast, had also said that India had signed International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination way back in 1965.

The Bezbaruah panel was set up by MHA on February 5, 2014, to suggest "suitable remedial measures" which could be taken, in the wake of attacks on the people from the Northeast in Delhi and other parts of the country including the death of youth Nido Tania, a student from Arunachal Pradesh.

The petition filed by Karma Dorjee and others had said that Bezbaruah panel had recommended changes in the to curb and punish incidents of racial violence targeting people from Northeast region.

The had issued notice to the Centre on PILs seeking its direction to them to frame guideline to protect the people from Northeastern states in various parts of the country against alleged racial discrimination.

The petitions had alleged that people from Northeastern region, who move out of their states in search of better opportunities for studies and jobs, were subjected to racial taunts and violence on a daily basis due to their physical appearance at the hands of people of their own country.
image
Business Standard
177 22

Racial violence agnst NE people: SC differs with govt views

The Supreme has expressed disagreement with the Centre that the prevailing penal provisions were good enough to cover the issue of hate crimes and racial violence, especially against the people of North Eastern states.

"No, it does not," reacted a bench comprising Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justices A M Khanwilkar and when the Centre, while expressing reluctance to suggestions for a specific legislation, said sections 153 A and B of (IPC) covered anti-racial issues.

"The examination is going on whether specific legislation is required or not as the provisions of the covers everything and it would be wrong to say it does not cover it," Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh said.

He said section 153 B covers everything and the could "examine" it. "We will assist you. If you are not satisfied, we will replace it with a new law," he said.

The deliberations were going on in the background of the recommendation of M P Bezbaruah committee which suggested amendment in sections 153 A and 153 B of the as a long- term measure to deal with the issue of racial violence.

While the officer was trying to make his submission on the recommendation of Bezbaruah committee, which set up by the Ministry of Home Ministry (MHA) on February 5, 2014 after several incidents of hate crimes against persons hailing from the Northeast, the bench expressed displeasure that effective steps were not being taken to address the issues.

"Nothing is on record to show what steps have been taken. We are not going to take what is there in the affidavit," the bench said, adding "legislation is one part of the recommendations".

The bench, which posted the matter for hearing on Friday, wanted to know from the Centre whether any steps have been taken to set up a nodal agency to monitor the complaints and related issues.

"A pro-active work has to be undertaken. What type of programme has to be there? Call your 'babus' and tell them. We have to pass an order. We can't issue ominous type of directions," the bench said stressing that there should be a nodal agency to address the issues of the Northeastern people.
The bench said there was a need to have a nodal agency,

as at the time of need, it would be asked whom to catch to implement the measures as there would also be the requirement of coordination with various departments.

The bench said the Bezbaruah committee had made several immediate and short term measures along with long term measures and all this should not remain only on paper.

"The people of Northeast are (staying) in large numbers in Delhi, Pune, Bangalore etc which are educational hub. You identify those areas where these people are in large numbers," the bench said, adding it is not visible whether any such nodal agency was working.

The ASG said he will get back on all the issues raised by the bench and made a mention of steps already taken in the national capital to address the issues of the Northeastern people and what could be the best mechanism.

Earlier too, the was informed that incorporation of has to be done by Parliament and the Centre has to take steps.

The bench, which has been hearing a batch of PILs filed in 2014 following several incidents of hate crimes in Delhi against persons hailing from Northeast, had also said that India had signed International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination way back in 1965.

The Bezbaruah panel was set up by MHA on February 5, 2014, to suggest "suitable remedial measures" which could be taken, in the wake of attacks on the people from the Northeast in Delhi and other parts of the country including the death of youth Nido Tania, a student from Arunachal Pradesh.

The petition filed by Karma Dorjee and others had said that Bezbaruah panel had recommended changes in the to curb and punish incidents of racial violence targeting people from Northeast region.

The had issued notice to the Centre on PILs seeking its direction to them to frame guideline to protect the people from Northeastern states in various parts of the country against alleged racial discrimination.

The petitions had alleged that people from Northeastern region, who move out of their states in search of better opportunities for studies and jobs, were subjected to racial taunts and violence on a daily basis due to their physical appearance at the hands of people of their own country.

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard