You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Ready to appear before SC, but can I do so, asks Katju

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Justice Markandey Katju, summoned by the Supreme to explain his criticism of the Soumya case verdict, has said he was ready to do so but wanted the apex to consider whether Article 124(7) of the Constitution barred him from appearing before it.

The Supreme had two days ago summoned Katju to appear in person before it to point out the "fundamental flaws", as claimed by him in the sensational Soumya rape case.



In a post, the former apex judge said "I would be delighted to appear and discuss the matter in open court, but would only like the judges to consider whether, being a former Supreme judge, I am debarred from appearing by Article 124(7) of the Constitution. If the judges hold that it does not debar me, I would be happy to appear and place my views."

Article 124 deals with the establishment and constitution of the Supreme and its clause 7 says "No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme shall plead or act in any or before any authority within the territory of India".

In his latest post, Katju also said he was preparing his detailed response which would also be uploaded on his page.

"I have yet to receive the notice from the Supreme in the Soumya case, though I have been informally informed about it by the advocate on record of the Kerala Govt.," the former judge added.

A Thrissur trial had awarded Govindachamy the death sentence for raping 23-year-old Soumya on February 1, 2011, after pushing her out of a running train in Kerala. The death sentence was confirmed by the high court. The apex had commuted to life the death penalty awarded to the convict.

In an earlier post, Katju had criticised the apex saying it had grievously erred by not holding the convict guilty of murder and its judgement needed to be reviewed.

"It is regrettable that the has not read section 300 carefully. The judgment needs to be reviewed in an open hearing," Katju had said in his post.

An apex bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and U U Lalit had on October 17 said, "We issue notice to Justice Markandey Katju, former judge of this and request him to appear in in person and participate in the proceedings on November 11...As to whether the judgment and order dated September 15 passed by this Bench...Suffers from any fundamental flaw so as to require exercise of the review jurisdiction.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Ready to appear before SC, but can I do so, asks Katju

Justice Markandey Katju, summoned by the Supreme Court to explain his criticism of the Soumya case verdict, has said he was ready to do so but wanted the apex court to consider whether Article 124(7) of the Constitution barred him from appearing before it. The Supreme Court had two days ago summoned Katju to appear in person before it to point out the "fundamental flaws", as claimed by him in the sensational Soumya rape case. In a Facebook post, the former apex court judge said "I would be delighted to appear and discuss the matter in open court, but would only like the judges to consider whether, being a former Supreme Court judge, I am debarred from appearing by Article 124(7) of the Constitution. If the judges hold that it does not debar me, I would be happy to appear and place my views." Article 124 deals with the establishment and constitution of the Supreme Court and its clause 7 says "No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court shall plead or act in any ... Justice Markandey Katju, summoned by the Supreme to explain his criticism of the Soumya case verdict, has said he was ready to do so but wanted the apex to consider whether Article 124(7) of the Constitution barred him from appearing before it.

The Supreme had two days ago summoned Katju to appear in person before it to point out the "fundamental flaws", as claimed by him in the sensational Soumya rape case.

In a post, the former apex judge said "I would be delighted to appear and discuss the matter in open court, but would only like the judges to consider whether, being a former Supreme judge, I am debarred from appearing by Article 124(7) of the Constitution. If the judges hold that it does not debar me, I would be happy to appear and place my views."

Article 124 deals with the establishment and constitution of the Supreme and its clause 7 says "No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme shall plead or act in any or before any authority within the territory of India".

In his latest post, Katju also said he was preparing his detailed response which would also be uploaded on his page.

"I have yet to receive the notice from the Supreme in the Soumya case, though I have been informally informed about it by the advocate on record of the Kerala Govt.," the former judge added.

A Thrissur trial had awarded Govindachamy the death sentence for raping 23-year-old Soumya on February 1, 2011, after pushing her out of a running train in Kerala. The death sentence was confirmed by the high court. The apex had commuted to life the death penalty awarded to the convict.

In an earlier post, Katju had criticised the apex saying it had grievously erred by not holding the convict guilty of murder and its judgement needed to be reviewed.

"It is regrettable that the has not read section 300 carefully. The judgment needs to be reviewed in an open hearing," Katju had said in his post.

An apex bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and U U Lalit had on October 17 said, "We issue notice to Justice Markandey Katju, former judge of this and request him to appear in in person and participate in the proceedings on November 11...As to whether the judgment and order dated September 15 passed by this Bench...Suffers from any fundamental flaw so as to require exercise of the review jurisdiction.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Ready to appear before SC, but can I do so, asks Katju

Justice Markandey Katju, summoned by the Supreme to explain his criticism of the Soumya case verdict, has said he was ready to do so but wanted the apex to consider whether Article 124(7) of the Constitution barred him from appearing before it.

The Supreme had two days ago summoned Katju to appear in person before it to point out the "fundamental flaws", as claimed by him in the sensational Soumya rape case.

In a post, the former apex judge said "I would be delighted to appear and discuss the matter in open court, but would only like the judges to consider whether, being a former Supreme judge, I am debarred from appearing by Article 124(7) of the Constitution. If the judges hold that it does not debar me, I would be happy to appear and place my views."

Article 124 deals with the establishment and constitution of the Supreme and its clause 7 says "No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme shall plead or act in any or before any authority within the territory of India".

In his latest post, Katju also said he was preparing his detailed response which would also be uploaded on his page.

"I have yet to receive the notice from the Supreme in the Soumya case, though I have been informally informed about it by the advocate on record of the Kerala Govt.," the former judge added.

A Thrissur trial had awarded Govindachamy the death sentence for raping 23-year-old Soumya on February 1, 2011, after pushing her out of a running train in Kerala. The death sentence was confirmed by the high court. The apex had commuted to life the death penalty awarded to the convict.

In an earlier post, Katju had criticised the apex saying it had grievously erred by not holding the convict guilty of murder and its judgement needed to be reviewed.

"It is regrettable that the has not read section 300 carefully. The judgment needs to be reviewed in an open hearing," Katju had said in his post.

An apex bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and U U Lalit had on October 17 said, "We issue notice to Justice Markandey Katju, former judge of this and request him to appear in in person and participate in the proceedings on November 11...As to whether the judgment and order dated September 15 passed by this Bench...Suffers from any fundamental flaw so as to require exercise of the review jurisdiction.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard