You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

SC asks woman to bring back her fugitive daughter-in-law

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The today refused to release the attached properties of the mother-in-law of an absconding businesswoman, who is currently residing in London, saying she should first bring her back to

The top court asked the 75-years-old woman to first bring her Ritika Awasty, a promoter of Bush Foods Overseas Pvt Ltd, back to and then it would consider releasing her properties.

"We are not going to release the attached properties unless you bring her back. Ask her to come back to and we will release the properties," a bench of Justices and said.

appearing for the Centre said the government has made an extradition request to the United Kindom with regard to Awasty.

C U Singh appearing for Awasty's mother-in-law said her properties at were also attached by the authorities and she has no other place to go.

He urged the court to release her residential property which was attached on the order of the apex court on December 15 last year to compel Awasty's return from


The bench, however, posted the matter for further hearing on April 5.

On January 29, the apex court had said that Awasty, will have to face the "wrath of law" and it will take "all possible steps" to get her back.

Awasty, is facing trial in on charges of cheating, forgery and criminal breach of trust and has been evading arrest after she was allowed by the top court to go to

The court had said it will leave no stone unturned to bring back the businesswoman, stressing she cannot be allowed to get away after breaching the court's order.

The court, had said, "You will have to get her back. Speak to her and ask her to come back. We can modify our order but only after she comes back. Ask her to behave like a good "

On December 15 last year, the apex court had asked the Centre and government to expeditiously complete proceedings to declare the a proclaimed offender and attach her properties in

It had said since her bail had been cancelled by the court after she failed to return to from the United Kingdom, the proceedings to declare her a proclaimed offender should be completed expeditiously.

Awasty was allowed by the apex court to travel to to see her husband and daughter in January 2016 after giving an undertaking that she will return by March 31, 2016.

However, the period was later extended till May 31, 2016, but she did not return from which compelled the apex court to forfeit her security of Rs 86 lakh, cancel her bail and initiate contempt proceedings.

Awasty had challenged the order refusing to quash the FIR lodged against her but was granted bail and allowed to travel abroad by the apex court on an undertaking for looking after her husband and daughter in

The court had also revoked her passport after she failed to return to by May 31, 2016.

On September 12, the court had directed the Centre to take appropriate steps within two weeks thereafter for extradition with the Crown Prosecution Services and sought details of her properties in

It had also asked the Centre to submit the income tax returns of Awasty and her husband.

On August 29, 2016, the apex court had said that it was "prima facie satisfied" that Awasty had "committed contempt of this court by breaching the directions issued by the court, as also, violating the undertaking given to this court".

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Mon, March 12 2018. 23:15 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU