You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

SC to hear all pleas against demonetisation on Dec 2

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

In a breather to the Centre, the Supreme today agreed to hear on Decemeber 2 the pleas, including those pending in various High Courts, challenging the constitutional validity of its decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 and the inconvenience faced by common people due to it.

The bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur did not accept the submission of a battery of lawyers led by that the hearing of the petitions, pending in the apex against demonetisation, be started on November 29 instead of December 2.



"The issues are entirely different here from those (petitions pending in HCs)," Sibal said, adding that the constitutional validity of the notification has been challenged besides the issue of hardships faced by common people, farmers and traders.

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the Centre, said besides the matters pending in the apex court, there are as many as 24 petitions, as of now, in various High Courts and let there be a common hearing on December 2 when it can be decided whether this or the Delhi High would take them up.

He also referred to the scheduled hearing on December 2 when the issue of transferring the HC cases either to the apex or to one of the High Courts would come up.

"We will examine both the aspects (of inconvenience and constitutional validity of notification). Come on Friday at 2.00 pm," the bench, also comprising Justice D Y Chandrachud, said and asked the Centre to file an additional affidavit, if any, explaining the "schemes and steps" taken to ease the situation that has arisen due to demonetisation.

As soon as the hearing began, many advocates started arguing simultaneously attempting to highlight issues raised in their respective PILs.

Irked over the commotion, the said, "Let there be some order in the courtroom. All of you are speaking at one time. We will then adjourn the hearing by six weeks."

The bench then asked the lawyers appearing for petitioners to decide among themselves as to who will address the court.

Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, appearing for the CPM which has filed the plea on the issue, said Sibal will lead them and he would only "supplement".

Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court, has made clear that it will not go into the correctness of policy as the apex is already seized of it.
The packed SC courtroom witnessed an unpleasant scene

when the lawyers in support and against the Centre's move began trading charges.

Ashwini Upadhyay, a lawyer and spokesperson for BJP, said that 78 per cent of citizens use currency notes lower than Rs 100 and only 22 per cent have higher value bills. He contended a majority of people have supported the decision aimed against blackmoney.

"The PILs opposing the demonetization have been filed by vested interests and people responsible for 2G, CWG and Coal scam are behind them. Thus they are not maintainable," he said, adding they were those who had propounded the "zero loss" theory in 2G and coal scam.

However, lawyers including M L Sharma and S Muthukumar sought compensation for those who died allegedly due stress caused by and claimed the ruling party has created a "havoc".

The intervened and asked the lawyers not to treat the as a "public platform" to voice their views on demonetisation.

Yesterday, the Centre had filed an affidavit in the apex on and said that the "bold move" would eradicate black money and slush funds operating since independence which created a "parallel economy" hitting the poor and the middle class.

In its affidavit, the Centre had also said the decision, on which total secrecy was maintained, would now help in proper implementation of the ambitious 'Jan Dhan Yojana' under which around 22 crore bank accounts for poor people have been opened.

Earlier, the apex had refused the Centre's plea to stay the proceedings pending before various high courts, saying people may get "immediate relief" from them.

It had sought response of all the petitioners, who have challenged the move in different high courts, on a plea by the Centre seeking transfer of all these matters to either the apex or one of the high courts.

The Attorney General had told the that the situation is "much better" and more than Rs six lakh crore has been deposited so far in the banks since the move was announced and there is a big surge in digital money transaction.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

SC to hear all pleas against demonetisation on Dec 2

In a breather to the Centre, the Supreme Court today agreed to hear on Decemeber 2 the pleas, including those pending in various High Courts, challenging the constitutional validity of its decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 and the inconvenience faced by common people due to it. The bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur did not accept the submission of a battery of lawyers led by Kapil Sibal that the hearing of the petitions, pending in the apex court against demonetisation, be started on November 29 instead of December 2. "The issues are entirely different here from those (petitions pending in HCs)," Sibal said, adding that the constitutional validity of the demonetisation notification has been challenged besides the issue of hardships faced by common people, farmers and traders. Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the Centre, said besides the matters pending in the apex court, there are as many as 24 petitions, as of now, in various High ... In a breather to the Centre, the Supreme today agreed to hear on Decemeber 2 the pleas, including those pending in various High Courts, challenging the constitutional validity of its decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 and the inconvenience faced by common people due to it.

The bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur did not accept the submission of a battery of lawyers led by that the hearing of the petitions, pending in the apex against demonetisation, be started on November 29 instead of December 2.

"The issues are entirely different here from those (petitions pending in HCs)," Sibal said, adding that the constitutional validity of the notification has been challenged besides the issue of hardships faced by common people, farmers and traders.

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the Centre, said besides the matters pending in the apex court, there are as many as 24 petitions, as of now, in various High Courts and let there be a common hearing on December 2 when it can be decided whether this or the Delhi High would take them up.

He also referred to the scheduled hearing on December 2 when the issue of transferring the HC cases either to the apex or to one of the High Courts would come up.

"We will examine both the aspects (of inconvenience and constitutional validity of notification). Come on Friday at 2.00 pm," the bench, also comprising Justice D Y Chandrachud, said and asked the Centre to file an additional affidavit, if any, explaining the "schemes and steps" taken to ease the situation that has arisen due to demonetisation.

As soon as the hearing began, many advocates started arguing simultaneously attempting to highlight issues raised in their respective PILs.

Irked over the commotion, the said, "Let there be some order in the courtroom. All of you are speaking at one time. We will then adjourn the hearing by six weeks."

The bench then asked the lawyers appearing for petitioners to decide among themselves as to who will address the court.

Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, appearing for the CPM which has filed the plea on the issue, said Sibal will lead them and he would only "supplement".

Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court, has made clear that it will not go into the correctness of policy as the apex is already seized of it.
The packed SC courtroom witnessed an unpleasant scene

when the lawyers in support and against the Centre's move began trading charges.

Ashwini Upadhyay, a lawyer and spokesperson for BJP, said that 78 per cent of citizens use currency notes lower than Rs 100 and only 22 per cent have higher value bills. He contended a majority of people have supported the decision aimed against blackmoney.

"The PILs opposing the demonetization have been filed by vested interests and people responsible for 2G, CWG and Coal scam are behind them. Thus they are not maintainable," he said, adding they were those who had propounded the "zero loss" theory in 2G and coal scam.

However, lawyers including M L Sharma and S Muthukumar sought compensation for those who died allegedly due stress caused by and claimed the ruling party has created a "havoc".

The intervened and asked the lawyers not to treat the as a "public platform" to voice their views on demonetisation.

Yesterday, the Centre had filed an affidavit in the apex on and said that the "bold move" would eradicate black money and slush funds operating since independence which created a "parallel economy" hitting the poor and the middle class.

In its affidavit, the Centre had also said the decision, on which total secrecy was maintained, would now help in proper implementation of the ambitious 'Jan Dhan Yojana' under which around 22 crore bank accounts for poor people have been opened.

Earlier, the apex had refused the Centre's plea to stay the proceedings pending before various high courts, saying people may get "immediate relief" from them.

It had sought response of all the petitioners, who have challenged the move in different high courts, on a plea by the Centre seeking transfer of all these matters to either the apex or one of the high courts.

The Attorney General had told the that the situation is "much better" and more than Rs six lakh crore has been deposited so far in the banks since the move was announced and there is a big surge in digital money transaction.
image
Business Standard
177 22

SC to hear all pleas against demonetisation on Dec 2

In a breather to the Centre, the Supreme today agreed to hear on Decemeber 2 the pleas, including those pending in various High Courts, challenging the constitutional validity of its decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 and the inconvenience faced by common people due to it.

The bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur did not accept the submission of a battery of lawyers led by that the hearing of the petitions, pending in the apex against demonetisation, be started on November 29 instead of December 2.

"The issues are entirely different here from those (petitions pending in HCs)," Sibal said, adding that the constitutional validity of the notification has been challenged besides the issue of hardships faced by common people, farmers and traders.

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the Centre, said besides the matters pending in the apex court, there are as many as 24 petitions, as of now, in various High Courts and let there be a common hearing on December 2 when it can be decided whether this or the Delhi High would take them up.

He also referred to the scheduled hearing on December 2 when the issue of transferring the HC cases either to the apex or to one of the High Courts would come up.

"We will examine both the aspects (of inconvenience and constitutional validity of notification). Come on Friday at 2.00 pm," the bench, also comprising Justice D Y Chandrachud, said and asked the Centre to file an additional affidavit, if any, explaining the "schemes and steps" taken to ease the situation that has arisen due to demonetisation.

As soon as the hearing began, many advocates started arguing simultaneously attempting to highlight issues raised in their respective PILs.

Irked over the commotion, the said, "Let there be some order in the courtroom. All of you are speaking at one time. We will then adjourn the hearing by six weeks."

The bench then asked the lawyers appearing for petitioners to decide among themselves as to who will address the court.

Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, appearing for the CPM which has filed the plea on the issue, said Sibal will lead them and he would only "supplement".

Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court, has made clear that it will not go into the correctness of policy as the apex is already seized of it.
The packed SC courtroom witnessed an unpleasant scene

when the lawyers in support and against the Centre's move began trading charges.

Ashwini Upadhyay, a lawyer and spokesperson for BJP, said that 78 per cent of citizens use currency notes lower than Rs 100 and only 22 per cent have higher value bills. He contended a majority of people have supported the decision aimed against blackmoney.

"The PILs opposing the demonetization have been filed by vested interests and people responsible for 2G, CWG and Coal scam are behind them. Thus they are not maintainable," he said, adding they were those who had propounded the "zero loss" theory in 2G and coal scam.

However, lawyers including M L Sharma and S Muthukumar sought compensation for those who died allegedly due stress caused by and claimed the ruling party has created a "havoc".

The intervened and asked the lawyers not to treat the as a "public platform" to voice their views on demonetisation.

Yesterday, the Centre had filed an affidavit in the apex on and said that the "bold move" would eradicate black money and slush funds operating since independence which created a "parallel economy" hitting the poor and the middle class.

In its affidavit, the Centre had also said the decision, on which total secrecy was maintained, would now help in proper implementation of the ambitious 'Jan Dhan Yojana' under which around 22 crore bank accounts for poor people have been opened.

Earlier, the apex had refused the Centre's plea to stay the proceedings pending before various high courts, saying people may get "immediate relief" from them.

It had sought response of all the petitioners, who have challenged the move in different high courts, on a plea by the Centre seeking transfer of all these matters to either the apex or one of the high courts.

The Attorney General had told the that the situation is "much better" and more than Rs six lakh crore has been deposited so far in the banks since the move was announced and there is a big surge in digital money transaction.

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard