ALSO READIdea Cellular seeks NCLT nod over approval of merger with Vodafone Merger with BSNL desirable for strong pan-India play: MTNL CMD Idea-Vodafone merger: What it means for telecom stocks and who gains most Trai forms subgroups to identify, weed out obsolete rules Bad news for telcos; Trai to impose up to Rs 10 lakh for call drops
The amount is to be deposited in the Telecom Consumers Education and Protection Fund (TCEPF) as Idea would not be able to make the refund to subscribers in view of the non- availability of the rated call data records.
The issue dates back to May 2005 when the Department of Telecom (DoT) amended licences to permit inter-service area connectivity among telecom operators within four states -- Maharashtra, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh.
As per the amendment, calls within each of these states were treated as intra-service area (or local) calls for the purpose of call routing and levy of access deficit charge.
The regulator said that despite the amendment, several private GSM operators were charging higher rates for calls terminating on the network of state-run firms BSNL and MTNL compared to calls made on the network of private operators within the boundary of these states.
"...The Authority hereby directs M/s Idea to deposit the amount of Rs 2,97,90,173 charged in excess from its subscribers during the period from May 2005 to January 2007, as computed by M/s Idea, in TCEPF and report compliance within 15 days of issue of this direction," said the order dated August 24, 2017, signed by Trai's adviser ST Abbas.
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India in February 2006 directed mobile service providers to differential rates being levied by them on subscribers.
It asked operators to refund excess amount that they charged to their customers.
The direction was challenged by the Cellular Operators Association of India and other telecom operators while they continued charging higher rates to consumers.
Telecom tribunal TDSAT dismissed COAI's appeal following which the industry body moved the Supreme Court. The apex court dismissed the appeal in January 2015.
Idea Cellular said that the excess amount cannot be refunded to subscribers as call data records of that period are not available with it. The regulator, therefore, directed Idea to deposit the fund in TCEPF.