You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Transport scam: Court still awaiting copy of HC order

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Arguments on the appointment of special public prosecutor in the Rs 100 crore transport scam case in could not be taken by a special for the third time today, as it was yet to receive a copy of the High Court's August 4 order on the powers of government and the Lieutenant Governor.

Special Judge Poonam Chaudhry, who had earlier fixed the matter for today to hear arguments on the issue, put up the case for November 21.



This is the third time that the special could not take up the matter due to non-receipt of the HC verdict. Before this, the matter came up before it on August 22 and September 20.

"Order of the High has not yet been received. List the matter on November 21 for arguments," the said.

The high in its August 4 verdict had set aside the special court's earlier order turning down government's notification appointing a Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) in the case.

While advocate Gupta was appointed SPP by Najeeb Jung last year, advocate B S Joon was notified for the post by the AAP government.

However, the special had in September last year observed that the LG-appointed SPP would conduct proceedings in the matter, which was challenged by the government before the high court.

The high had held that the has to act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers while exercising the power to appoint an SPP for any case.

It had set aside the trial court's September 7, 2015 order and directed the special judge to pass an appropriate order afresh in accordance with law.

The ruling assumes significance as, of late, various criminal matters, including the transport scam, in the high and trial courts have witnessed heated arguments between prosecutors appointed by the government and the LG, as to who would represent the state or the police.

The Anti Corruption Branch of Government had on September 3 last year filed its charge sheet in the naming nine persons, including two IAS officers, as accused in the transport scam case. The is yet to take cognisance of the charge sheet.

The charge sheet was filed for offences punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC, including sections 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servant), 420 (cheating), 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Transport scam: Court still awaiting copy of HC order

Arguments on the appointment of special public prosecutor in the Rs 100 crore transport scam case in Delhi could not be taken by a special court for the third time today, as it was yet to receive a copy of the High Court's August 4 order on the powers of Delhi government and the Lieutenant Governor. Special Judge Poonam Chaudhry, who had earlier fixed the matter for today to hear arguments on the issue, put up the case for November 21. This is the third time that the special court could not take up the matter due to non-receipt of the HC verdict. Before this, the matter came up before it on August 22 and September 20. "Order of the Delhi High Court has not yet been received. List the matter on November 21 for arguments," the court said. The high court in its August 4 verdict had set aside the special court's earlier order turning down Delhi government's notification appointing a Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) in the case. While advocate Sanjay Kumar Gupta was appointed SPP by LG ... Arguments on the appointment of special public prosecutor in the Rs 100 crore transport scam case in could not be taken by a special for the third time today, as it was yet to receive a copy of the High Court's August 4 order on the powers of government and the Lieutenant Governor.

Special Judge Poonam Chaudhry, who had earlier fixed the matter for today to hear arguments on the issue, put up the case for November 21.

This is the third time that the special could not take up the matter due to non-receipt of the HC verdict. Before this, the matter came up before it on August 22 and September 20.

"Order of the High has not yet been received. List the matter on November 21 for arguments," the said.

The high in its August 4 verdict had set aside the special court's earlier order turning down government's notification appointing a Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) in the case.

While advocate Gupta was appointed SPP by Najeeb Jung last year, advocate B S Joon was notified for the post by the AAP government.

However, the special had in September last year observed that the LG-appointed SPP would conduct proceedings in the matter, which was challenged by the government before the high court.

The high had held that the has to act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers while exercising the power to appoint an SPP for any case.

It had set aside the trial court's September 7, 2015 order and directed the special judge to pass an appropriate order afresh in accordance with law.

The ruling assumes significance as, of late, various criminal matters, including the transport scam, in the high and trial courts have witnessed heated arguments between prosecutors appointed by the government and the LG, as to who would represent the state or the police.

The Anti Corruption Branch of Government had on September 3 last year filed its charge sheet in the naming nine persons, including two IAS officers, as accused in the transport scam case. The is yet to take cognisance of the charge sheet.

The charge sheet was filed for offences punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC, including sections 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servant), 420 (cheating), 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Transport scam: Court still awaiting copy of HC order

Arguments on the appointment of special public prosecutor in the Rs 100 crore transport scam case in could not be taken by a special for the third time today, as it was yet to receive a copy of the High Court's August 4 order on the powers of government and the Lieutenant Governor.

Special Judge Poonam Chaudhry, who had earlier fixed the matter for today to hear arguments on the issue, put up the case for November 21.

This is the third time that the special could not take up the matter due to non-receipt of the HC verdict. Before this, the matter came up before it on August 22 and September 20.

"Order of the High has not yet been received. List the matter on November 21 for arguments," the said.

The high in its August 4 verdict had set aside the special court's earlier order turning down government's notification appointing a Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) in the case.

While advocate Gupta was appointed SPP by Najeeb Jung last year, advocate B S Joon was notified for the post by the AAP government.

However, the special had in September last year observed that the LG-appointed SPP would conduct proceedings in the matter, which was challenged by the government before the high court.

The high had held that the has to act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers while exercising the power to appoint an SPP for any case.

It had set aside the trial court's September 7, 2015 order and directed the special judge to pass an appropriate order afresh in accordance with law.

The ruling assumes significance as, of late, various criminal matters, including the transport scam, in the high and trial courts have witnessed heated arguments between prosecutors appointed by the government and the LG, as to who would represent the state or the police.

The Anti Corruption Branch of Government had on September 3 last year filed its charge sheet in the naming nine persons, including two IAS officers, as accused in the transport scam case. The is yet to take cognisance of the charge sheet.

The charge sheet was filed for offences punishable under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the IPC, including sections 409 (criminal breach of trust by public servant), 420 (cheating), 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard