You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Why sadhvi is in jail after NIA dropped charges, HC asks

Press Trust of India  |  Mumbai 

Hearing a bail application of sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, arrested in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, the today asked how she could be kept in prison when the prosecuting agency had said there was no case against her.

Thakur moved the high after the special for Control of Organised Crime Act cases denied her bail on June 28.



The division bench of justices and P D Naik asked the NIA to submit a compilation of all the previous orders and judgements pertaining to the case.

Thakur was given a clean chit by the NIA earlier this year, but the trial refused her bail.

Her petition in the high said the lower had failed to take into consideration the change in circumstances.

In November 2015, the special denied her bail, holding that prima facie there was some evidence against her.

But in May, NIA filed a fresh charge sheet (after taking over the case from ATS), which gave a clean chit to Thakur.

Her lawyer, advocate Jai Prakash Mishra, argued today that there was no material evidence against her. NIA's lawyer also told the high that the agency had concluded that charges against her could not be substantiated, and the earlier charge sheet filed by ATS was erroneous.

"This is an odd case where the prosecution has no objections and yet the accused is denied bail and kept behind the bars," the bench observed, seeking copies of both the charge sheets and the special court's orders denying her bail. Next hearing would be on November 16.

Six persons died and 100 were injured in the bomb blast at Malegaon, a predominantly Muslim town in north Maharashtra, on September 29, 2008.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Why sadhvi is in jail after NIA dropped charges, HC asks

Hearing a bail application of sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, arrested in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, the Bombay High Court today asked how she could be kept in prison when the prosecuting agency had said there was no case against her. Thakur moved the high court after the special court for Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act cases denied her bail on June 28. The division bench of justices N H Patil and P D Naik asked the NIA to submit a compilation of all the previous orders and judgements pertaining to the case. Thakur was given a clean chit by the NIA earlier this year, but the trial court refused her bail. Her petition in the high court said the lower court had failed to take into consideration the change in circumstances. In November 2015, the special court denied her bail, holding that prima facie there was some evidence against her. But in May, NIA filed a fresh charge sheet (after taking over the case from Maharashtra ATS), which gave a clean chit to Thakur. Her ... Hearing a bail application of sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, arrested in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, the today asked how she could be kept in prison when the prosecuting agency had said there was no case against her.

Thakur moved the high after the special for Control of Organised Crime Act cases denied her bail on June 28.

The division bench of justices and P D Naik asked the NIA to submit a compilation of all the previous orders and judgements pertaining to the case.

Thakur was given a clean chit by the NIA earlier this year, but the trial refused her bail.

Her petition in the high said the lower had failed to take into consideration the change in circumstances.

In November 2015, the special denied her bail, holding that prima facie there was some evidence against her.

But in May, NIA filed a fresh charge sheet (after taking over the case from ATS), which gave a clean chit to Thakur.

Her lawyer, advocate Jai Prakash Mishra, argued today that there was no material evidence against her. NIA's lawyer also told the high that the agency had concluded that charges against her could not be substantiated, and the earlier charge sheet filed by ATS was erroneous.

"This is an odd case where the prosecution has no objections and yet the accused is denied bail and kept behind the bars," the bench observed, seeking copies of both the charge sheets and the special court's orders denying her bail. Next hearing would be on November 16.

Six persons died and 100 were injured in the bomb blast at Malegaon, a predominantly Muslim town in north Maharashtra, on September 29, 2008.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Why sadhvi is in jail after NIA dropped charges, HC asks

Hearing a bail application of sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, arrested in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, the today asked how she could be kept in prison when the prosecuting agency had said there was no case against her.

Thakur moved the high after the special for Control of Organised Crime Act cases denied her bail on June 28.

The division bench of justices and P D Naik asked the NIA to submit a compilation of all the previous orders and judgements pertaining to the case.

Thakur was given a clean chit by the NIA earlier this year, but the trial refused her bail.

Her petition in the high said the lower had failed to take into consideration the change in circumstances.

In November 2015, the special denied her bail, holding that prima facie there was some evidence against her.

But in May, NIA filed a fresh charge sheet (after taking over the case from ATS), which gave a clean chit to Thakur.

Her lawyer, advocate Jai Prakash Mishra, argued today that there was no material evidence against her. NIA's lawyer also told the high that the agency had concluded that charges against her could not be substantiated, and the earlier charge sheet filed by ATS was erroneous.

"This is an odd case where the prosecution has no objections and yet the accused is denied bail and kept behind the bars," the bench observed, seeking copies of both the charge sheets and the special court's orders denying her bail. Next hearing would be on November 16.

Six persons died and 100 were injured in the bomb blast at Malegaon, a predominantly Muslim town in north Maharashtra, on September 29, 2008.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard