You are here: Home » Reuters » News

Federal Reserve proposes new limits on Wall Street energy bets

By Patrick Rucker and Olivia Oran

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve on Friday outlined a plan to limit bets on the energy sector by forcing companies like and Morgan Stanley to hold more capital against such investments.

Under current law, Group Inc and Morgan Stanley may invest in energy storage and transportation in ways that other banks cannot, but the U.S. central bank's new plan would make such bets more costly.

Banks would have to hold more capital against energy and commodity investments under the plan. The also contemplated other limits like banning control of power plants and prohibiting bank holding companies from owning copper.

At this stage the plan is only a proposal that is subject to comment and change. The has opened a three-month window for comment.

The Fed, which regulates the banking and financial services sector, said the new measures would help shield banks and the broader financial system from a costly mishap like the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Under the plan, officials said, banks would have to hold roughly $1 in capital for every $1 of energy infrastructure they owned.

Under the plan, officials said, banks would have to hold roughly $1 in capital for every $1 of energy infrastructure they owned.

In the Fed's calculus of bank safety, that amounts to a 1,250 percent capital charge - the regulator's highest tariff for the riskiest investments.

would have to offer roughly $4 billion in fresh capital to satisfy the proposal.

SCALING BACK

Firms on have already been scaling back their ownership of refinery, shipping and storage facilities in the face of scrutiny from regulators who have asked what benefit comes from banks in the raw material market.

Morgan Stanley has decreased the value of physical commodity assets on its balance sheet to $321 million in 2015 from $9.7 billion in 2011.

has shed much of its energy infrastructure, too, but the bank is still a major trader of fossil fuels.

J. Aron, Goldman's arm, traded more natural gas than both Chevron and ExxonMobil in the second quarter of this year, according to Natural Gas Intelligence, a trade publication.

The energy trader moved 5.42 billion cubic feet of physical gas in the United States during the period, more than 73 percent of the volume it did during the same time in 2011, according to data.

Morgan Stanley and Goldman declined to comment on the Fed's proposal.

Between 2007 and 2009, trading for banks like Morgan Stanley and Goldman accounted for as much as a fifth of their overall annual revenues.

Although Goldman has scaled back its ownership of physical commodities, it has remained committed to trading.

The bank during the second quarter of 2016 earned more from that business than any of its peers, according to data provider Coalition.

Tougher regulations conceived since the 2008 financial crisis, though, have push much of that trading business to specialists like Glencore Plc, Vitol Group and Mercuria Energy Group.

(Reporting By Patrick Rucker in and Olivia Oran in New York. Additional reporting by Catherine Ngai and Jessica Resnick-Ault; Editing by Chris Reese, Linda Stern and Paul Simao)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22
Business Standard

Federal Reserve proposes new limits on Wall Street energy bets

Reuters  |  WASHINGTON/NEW YORK 

By Patrick Rucker and Olivia Oran

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve on Friday outlined a plan to limit bets on the energy sector by forcing companies like and Morgan Stanley to hold more capital against such investments.

Under current law, Group Inc and Morgan Stanley may invest in energy storage and transportation in ways that other banks cannot, but the U.S. central bank's new plan would make such bets more costly.

Banks would have to hold more capital against energy and commodity investments under the plan. The also contemplated other limits like banning control of power plants and prohibiting bank holding companies from owning copper.

At this stage the plan is only a proposal that is subject to comment and change. The has opened a three-month window for comment.

The Fed, which regulates the banking and financial services sector, said the new measures would help shield banks and the broader financial system from a costly mishap like the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Under the plan, officials said, banks would have to hold roughly $1 in capital for every $1 of energy infrastructure they owned.

Under the plan, officials said, banks would have to hold roughly $1 in capital for every $1 of energy infrastructure they owned.

In the Fed's calculus of bank safety, that amounts to a 1,250 percent capital charge - the regulator's highest tariff for the riskiest investments.

would have to offer roughly $4 billion in fresh capital to satisfy the proposal.

SCALING BACK

Firms on have already been scaling back their ownership of refinery, shipping and storage facilities in the face of scrutiny from regulators who have asked what benefit comes from banks in the raw material market.

Morgan Stanley has decreased the value of physical commodity assets on its balance sheet to $321 million in 2015 from $9.7 billion in 2011.

has shed much of its energy infrastructure, too, but the bank is still a major trader of fossil fuels.

J. Aron, Goldman's arm, traded more natural gas than both Chevron and ExxonMobil in the second quarter of this year, according to Natural Gas Intelligence, a trade publication.

The energy trader moved 5.42 billion cubic feet of physical gas in the United States during the period, more than 73 percent of the volume it did during the same time in 2011, according to data.

Morgan Stanley and Goldman declined to comment on the Fed's proposal.

Between 2007 and 2009, trading for banks like Morgan Stanley and Goldman accounted for as much as a fifth of their overall annual revenues.

Although Goldman has scaled back its ownership of physical commodities, it has remained committed to trading.

The bank during the second quarter of 2016 earned more from that business than any of its peers, according to data provider Coalition.

Tougher regulations conceived since the 2008 financial crisis, though, have push much of that trading business to specialists like Glencore Plc, Vitol Group and Mercuria Energy Group.

(Reporting By Patrick Rucker in and Olivia Oran in New York. Additional reporting by Catherine Ngai and Jessica Resnick-Ault; Editing by Chris Reese, Linda Stern and Paul Simao)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Federal Reserve proposes new limits on Wall Street energy bets

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve on Friday outlined a plan to limit Wall Street bets on the energy sector by forcing companies like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to hold more capital against such investments.

By Patrick Rucker and Olivia Oran

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve on Friday outlined a plan to limit bets on the energy sector by forcing companies like and Morgan Stanley to hold more capital against such investments.

Under current law, Group Inc and Morgan Stanley may invest in energy storage and transportation in ways that other banks cannot, but the U.S. central bank's new plan would make such bets more costly.

Banks would have to hold more capital against energy and commodity investments under the plan. The also contemplated other limits like banning control of power plants and prohibiting bank holding companies from owning copper.

At this stage the plan is only a proposal that is subject to comment and change. The has opened a three-month window for comment.

The Fed, which regulates the banking and financial services sector, said the new measures would help shield banks and the broader financial system from a costly mishap like the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Under the plan, officials said, banks would have to hold roughly $1 in capital for every $1 of energy infrastructure they owned.

Under the plan, officials said, banks would have to hold roughly $1 in capital for every $1 of energy infrastructure they owned.

In the Fed's calculus of bank safety, that amounts to a 1,250 percent capital charge - the regulator's highest tariff for the riskiest investments.

would have to offer roughly $4 billion in fresh capital to satisfy the proposal.

SCALING BACK

Firms on have already been scaling back their ownership of refinery, shipping and storage facilities in the face of scrutiny from regulators who have asked what benefit comes from banks in the raw material market.

Morgan Stanley has decreased the value of physical commodity assets on its balance sheet to $321 million in 2015 from $9.7 billion in 2011.

has shed much of its energy infrastructure, too, but the bank is still a major trader of fossil fuels.

J. Aron, Goldman's arm, traded more natural gas than both Chevron and ExxonMobil in the second quarter of this year, according to Natural Gas Intelligence, a trade publication.

The energy trader moved 5.42 billion cubic feet of physical gas in the United States during the period, more than 73 percent of the volume it did during the same time in 2011, according to data.

Morgan Stanley and Goldman declined to comment on the Fed's proposal.

Between 2007 and 2009, trading for banks like Morgan Stanley and Goldman accounted for as much as a fifth of their overall annual revenues.

Although Goldman has scaled back its ownership of physical commodities, it has remained committed to trading.

The bank during the second quarter of 2016 earned more from that business than any of its peers, according to data provider Coalition.

Tougher regulations conceived since the 2008 financial crisis, though, have push much of that trading business to specialists like Glencore Plc, Vitol Group and Mercuria Energy Group.

(Reporting By Patrick Rucker in and Olivia Oran in New York. Additional reporting by Catherine Ngai and Jessica Resnick-Ault; Editing by Chris Reese, Linda Stern and Paul Simao)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

image
Business Standard
177 22

Upgrade To Premium Services

Welcome User

Business Standard is happy to inform you of the launch of "Business Standard Premium Services"

As a premium subscriber you get an across device unfettered access to a range of services which include:

  • Access Exclusive content - articles, features & opinion pieces
  • Weekly Industry/Genre specific newsletters - Choose multiple industries/genres
  • Access to 17 plus years of content archives
  • Set Stock price alerts for your portfolio and watch list and get them delivered to your e-mail box
  • End of day news alerts on 5 companies (via email)
  • NEW: Get seamless access to WSJ.com at a great price. No additional sign-up required.
 

Premium Services

In Partnership with

 

Dear Guest,

 

Welcome to the premium services of Business Standard brought to you courtesy FIS.
Kindly visit the Manage my subscription page to discover the benefits of this programme.

Enjoy Reading!
Team Business Standard