Advanced warship programme: Navy says build abroad
Ajai Shukla / Mazagon Dock Ltd, Mumbai, Mar 27, 2009, 00:09 IST
The Indian Navy’s Project 17 is nearing completion; three Indian-designed-and-built stealth frigates of the Shivalik class are on track to enter service. Now, attention has switched to Project 17-A, the country’s biggest-ever naval purchase, a Rs 17,000 crore plan to build seven stealth frigates that are even more advanced than the Shivalik class.
The Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) has long cleared the project, but no order has yet been placed by the Ministry of Defence. Business Standard has learned that the order is held up by a difference of opinion between the shipyards and the navy on where these frigates should be built.
The two defence shipyards capable of manufacturing 5000-tonne frigates — Mazagon Dock Limited, Mumbai (MDL) and Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers, Kolkata (GRSE) — argue that Project 17-A should be built entirely in India. The Indian Navy insists that the first two frigates should be built in a foreign shipyard. After the Indian shipyards have observed how it is done, they can build the next five vessels.
At the heart of the disagreement is a new, highly advanced building method — modular shipbuilding — that India will use for Project 17-A, and for all projects thereafter.
Conventional shipbuilding was relatively simple: first weld together a steel hull, and then put in the engines, piping, electrical wiring, fitments, weaponry and electronics that make it a fighting platform. Modular shipbuilding is far more complex, akin to a giant Lego game. The warship is built in 300-tonne blocks, each block complete with all the piping, electrical wiring and fitments that form a part of the ship. Then these 300-tonne blocks are brought together by giant cranes and assembled into a complete warship.
This creates an entirely different set of design challenges. Each bulkhead wall, each pipe, each cable, and each electronic component in a 300-tonne block must precisely connect with its counterpart in the neighbouring block. Each block is designed separately, but all of them must come together in perfect alignment.
This method has never been used by either MDL or GRSE; they accept the need for a foreign design partner. But both shipyards, having successfully built frigates of the Brahmaputra and the Shivalik class, claim they already have the expertise needed to build Project 17-A, based on the foreign partner’s drawings. Admiral HS Malhi, Chairman and Managing Director (CMD) of MDL says, “We need to go abroad for the production drawings… But for actual modular construction, no technology is required to be transferred”
The Navy believes that if MDL and GRSE try to master this skill while they build the first Project 17-A frigates, the entire programme will be delayed unacceptably. Instead, the Director of Naval Design, Rear Admiral MK Badhwar, says the foreign design partner selected should built the first two frigates in his own shipyard, observed by Indian workmen who can thereby pick up the skills.
The DND says, “This will also make the vendor demonstrate “buildability”. He must demonstrate that his design can be actually built into a warship, using modular construction, in four years. That will create a demonstrated benchmark for GRSE and MDL; otherwise, if there are delays later, our shipyards could argue that the foreign yard too would have taken a long period to build each frigate.”
The MoD’s is finding it difficult to reconcile these two viewpoints, partly because a decision to build two frigates abroad would sharply escalate the cost of Project 17-A. Each Shivalik class stealth frigate, built in MDL, cost Rs 2000-2500 crores. The bill for a comparable frigate, built in a European shipyard for the Australian navy, has come to more than double that figure.
Tomorrow: French shipyard, DCNS, favourite as design partner
All nonsense, With the advancement of computers All designs are computer aided and there is no need to worry about labor who builds these things as if they just follows the computer aided design plans, By making the ship foreign it is another way to siphon off foreign reserves, and let foreigners steal our design and technology developed in house. Why Indians like being probed by every other country. Is this country not our mother? Shameless people
Navy is right by asking to build first frigates in vendor's shipyar as it will not leave any space for any excuse generally used by our PSUs & that hampers out defence preparedness. Armed forced are generally targeted by media & PSUs for their stubbornness but here it is completely opposite. Navy's argument is very much logical & Navy should not deter from its stand. WE JUST CANN'T ALLOW PSUs TO HORN THEIR SKILL AT THE COST OF DEFENCE PREPAREDNESS OF OUR COUNTRY FOR WHICH ARMED FORCES WILL HAVE TO PAY WITH THEIR BLOOD.
I think the navy has a point!!
OK so ...why not digitally link(?) the two shipyards and have a rotating
shift of three months, wherein one set of workers are training abroad and they are shifted to India( who then train fellow workers and identify bottle necks) Let them go back after three months and come back with better skills. The cost of one ship abroad is nothing when compared to the benefits!!!! This can become the bench mark for the entire lot.
The Navy must not relent on its stand. The state owned shipyards have no sense of urgency and will resist any attempts to check their leisurely pace of work or their ability to invent excuses.
The navy should in fact take this project to the private sector who would make good use of the technological input from P17A to enhance India's status as a ship building nation. MDL is in any case overburdened with P17, P15A, P15B projects while GRSE set a record of sort when they took an eon to deliver P16A frigates.
The Navy must allow the Indian shipyards to build it. If it is required, then let the foreign shipyard build the first ship which can be observed by GRSE and MDL. Rather than MDL, the best bet is the GRSE which has build the three LST's and is now without any work whereas the MDL will have work on the 4P14B's and a large number of corvettes as well. They will have problem with space. Since GRSE is without any major work, they are the best bet to build the P17A's.
Content Guide
