Business Standard
Friday, May 25, 2012
Sponsored by  
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
||||Economy & Policy||||| 
 Section Home | News Now | Today's Paper | Features & Analysis | Politics & Public Affairs | Q&A | Columnists | BS Says
Home > Economy & Policy Live Markets | Commodities
 

'Ambani family agreement can't override Govt's right'
Press Trust of India / New Delhi Jun 29, 2009, 13:10 IST

The private Ambani family pact that split gas output from the Krishna Godavari basin D6 field between brothers Mukesh and Anil cannot over-ride Government's right to formulate gas utilisation policies aimed at larger public interest, the fertiliser ministry has said.     

Urea plants had been given the first priority in sale of natural gas from Reliance Industries' D6 but the June 15 order by the Bombay High Court had given 70 per cent of the initial volumes from fields to Anil Ambani Group's RNRL.     

"The gas in question has been allocated (to fertiliser, power and other sectors) based on the Government's authority and rights under the Production Sharing Contract (for D6) aimed at regulating gas marketing and allowing their orderly growth," Fertiliser Secretary Atul Chaturvedi wrote to his counterpart in Petroleum Ministry, R S Pandey, on June 24.     

"Our understanding is that any family settlement would not over-ride the sovereign right of Government to formulate policies aimed at larger public interest," he wrote.     

Twelve urea manufacturing companies were allocated 14.97 million cubic meters per day when the government prioritised sale of the initial 40 mmcmd from D6 primarily between fertiliser and power companies based on national priority of food security and meeting energy deficit.     

But the Bombay High Court on June 15 ruled that RIL should honour its commitment in the family split agreement and supply 28 mmcmd gas to RNRL.

"If such a private arrangement has implications on already signed Gas Sales and Purchase Agreements for the allocated gas and if the existing rights of fertiliser companies are altered to their disadvantage, I am afraid they may also seek available legal remedies independently," Chaturvedi wrote.     

He sought a re-confirmation from the Petroleum Ministry that "existing gas allocation, its price and GSPAs would remain intact."     

The fertiliser industry, he said, had sought a re-confirmation to the effect that the recent Bombay High Court judgement would have no implications on the supply of gas from KG basin.     

"The clarification/re-confirmation in this regard will remove the uncertainty in supply of feedstock to the fertiliser industry.     

"This would also have implications on the fuel oil and naphtha based urea units, which are making large investments to switch feedstock to natural gas as per the declared policy of the government," he wrote.     

Chaturvedi said fertiliser industry was allocated about 15 mmcmd of gas from D6 as first priority under the Gas Priority Utilisation Policy of the Government.     

The Bombay High Court had said that the terms of supply to RNRL would be based on RIL's bid for a 2004 NTPC tender.

The price in NTPC tender was $2.34 per million British thermal unit, 44 per cent lower than government-approved rates of $4.20 per mmBtu.     

The Bombay High Court on June 15 gave RIL and RNRL a month's time to work out firm gas volumes, price, timelines and other commercial details for sourcing the fuel from Krishna-Godavari basin fields.     

RIL can currently produce 37 mmcmd of gas per day from D6 fields but was producing only 28 mmcmd as some power and fertiliser companies are not taking their allotted quantities.     

In the MoU that split Dhirubhai Ambani's business empire, the Mukesh Ambani-run firm had committed to supply 28 mmcmd to power plants of the group run by his younger brother for 17 years.     

Mukesh had got petrochemicals, refining and the oil and gas business while the power plants, telecommunications and the financial services business had gone to Anil in the split.     

The price in the MoU was the same as the one RIL had bid for in a 2004 NTPC tender.     

RIL had bid to supply 12 mmscmd gas to NTPC at $2.34 per mmBtu but a Gas Sales and Purchase Agreement could not be signed because of dispute between the two over clauses like liability in the case of default.     

NTPC has dragged RIL to the Bombay High Court seeking performance of the bid in a separate case.

New Ipad Application :Business Standard's all new IPad App
Click here to download for free
Arrow Other Stories     
- Markets end flat
- SAIL to add 5 mn tonne capacity in FY13
- NHPC FY12 net up 28% at Rs 2,772 cr
- Aarti Industries Q4 up nearly 27% at Rs 28.24 crore
- BPCL posts four-fold jump in Q4 net at Rs 3,963 cr
  Read Business news in 
- Journey on, We are by Your Side. Click here to know more
- Benefits Upto Rs. 2.36 Lakhs on the Fully Loaded TJet Petrol.
- The Best Seller is Also the No. 1 in Mileage. Click here
- Watch The Film Here. Click here to know more..
- Leader in Passenger Car & Automobile Tyres. Click here
- 1 billion in saving for Unilever without any tangles.
- Learn How One City is Running on FOOD SCRAPS.
- One Partnership Endless Possibilities. Click here to know more
- Helping doctors detect diseases earlier, saving costs & extending lives.
- 36 Lakhs can get you a pool of Luxuries. Click here
- Which is the best plan for your daughter
- Check out the TRUE COLOURS of your Stocks, Now for FREE!
- One of the leading business schools in the world.Know More
Sorry, comments to this story are closed
Latest Messages
Posted by: vikram
if goverment is so much concern about gas then why do they sell block to oil and exploration company? why Goverment of India does not drill the well all over india and get the gas and oil-whatever they get. Frankly speaking the cost of exploration is very high and goverment has no such money to spend. Reliance Industries has used shareholder fund for oil and exploration and the risk was all on Reliance shareholders and ultimately demerger-RNRL was also a part of reliance. When goverment do not have right to ask about the exploration expenditure and does not share with Oil Exploration company then how does they have right over the Reliance Gas. If goverment has such right then Goverment should also pay back the block cost in which Oil could not be explore by various companies and lot of money has been wasted. I think India has matured enough and law are governed in India.Netas should first think and then come in public.
Table for Two
  Now available at Special price
  Rs.280/- Only

  Buy Now
BS POLL
UPA 2 has completed three years. How do you rate its performance?  Read the story
  Good
  Average
  Bad
Submit
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- RBI cracks down on exporters, banks Rs sees sharp rebound
- Petrol price rise offers FDI hope to retail chains
- No oil price review before June 1, two states cut tax
- Bharti Airtel acquires 49% in Qualcomm India for Rs 907 cr
- US sets more duties on India steel pipe
 
 More  
New Ipad Application
 Business Standard's all new IPad  App
 Click here to download for free
  Hot Searches  
 
Apalya |  Air India |  GAAR |  Agni  |  Solar eclipse |  Satyamev Jayate |  SRK |  Aamir Khan |  IPL |  Ertiga |  Sarfaesi Act |  Vodafone |  JP Morgan |  Transfer pricing |  Rupee |  Kingfisher Airlines |  Silver |  Provident Fund |  income tax refund |  iPhone |  Reliance Industries |  SEBI |  BSNL |  BSE |  NSE |  Mukesh Ambani |  Anil Ambani |  Infosys |  Pranab Mukherjee |  Sonia Gandhi |  Rahul Gandhi |  New Pension Scheme |  Reliance |  RBI |  GDP |  Gold |  Ratan Tata |  ICICI |  B-School |  Sensex |  Tax calculator |  Home Loan |  Personal Finance |  inflation |  oil prices |  Barack Obama |   
 
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter Portfolio Tracker
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring BS Books
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World | General News
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Contact Us