|
| Daiichi, Ranbaxy form joint team to counter FDA charges |
| BS Reporters / New Delhi/Mumbai Feb 27, 2009, 00:32 IST |
|
Daiichi Sankyo, which owns India’s biggest drug maker, said it had formed a team with Ranbaxy Laboratories, to address the data ‘falsification’ charges levied by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) even as analysts foresaw more trouble for the drug maker.
Ranbaxy and Daiichi’s shares plunged the most in more than four months on speculation of possible withdrawal of approved Abbreviated New Drug Approvals (ANDAs) from the Himachal Pradesh facility and on concern that other drug regulators may review their stand on the facility.
The USFDA yesterday accused the New Delhi-based Ranbaxy of falsifying data and test results of medicines produced from the Paonta Sahib facility to obtain marketing approval in the world’s biggest drug market. The drug regulator had stopped granting approval to the sale of medicines produced in the facility since September 2008 pending investigation.
A Daiichi Sankyo statement said the company takes the issue very seriously. “Both Daiichi and Ranbaxy have already formed a team to solve the issue,” it said. Referring to the Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) applied from the factory or all of applications based on the data of the factory, the Japanese company said that FDA letter gives the opportunity to Ranbaxy to co-operate with the agency to address the issues or withdraw the application.
“After carefully analyzing the letter and information, Ranbaxy will be responding to the FDA and will continue to co operate with the agency”, Daiichi added. Ranbaxy shares fell more than 18 per cent to Rs 169.85 today on the Bombay Stock Exchange, while Daiichi stock dropped about 10 per cent to ¥1,680 on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.
Indian generic industry and a section of analysts, however, see limited impact of the decision on other firms. The issue is company specific, an official with a drug firm said. However, for Ranbaxy, some analysts believe the FDA “issues are deep with connotations of fraudulent conduct’’ and that they have been getting worse rather than better ever since the warning letter in 2006 and the import alert in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Read Business news in |  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content Guide
