Business Standard / New Delhi Oct 27, 2009, 00:41 IST
Prime Ministers Manmohan Singh and Wen Jiao Bao have restored the much-needed sobriety to the India-China relationship through the tone of their meeting on the sidelines of the Fourth East Asia Summit in Thailand over the weekend. In the past few months, a war of words through the media has disrupted peace and tranquility between the neighbours. While the Indian media is free and does not necessarily reflect government opinion, no one could believe the same of China’s officially controlled media. The media hysteria was aggravated by unhelpful statements from China regarding the prime minister’s visit to Arunachal Pradesh. Coming on top of China’s official objections to Indian project proposals at the Asian Development Bank and followed by objections to the Dalai Lama’s visit to Arunachal, these events gave the impression that both governments were hurtling towards a confrontation. Against this background, the bilateral meeting between the two prime ministers took place at the right time and has helped calm nerves. Neither India nor China would like to have their attention diverted from the urgent task of economic development at home. Both countries are trying to deal with a difficult global economic situation. Hence, neither should want a deterioration in the bilateral relationship.
It is interesting to note, however, that while the Singh-Wen meeting was front page news in India, it hardly secured any attention in the Chinese media. Rather, the focus of the Chinese media was on the East Asia Summit and the Asean+3 meetings. Clearly, for all their official protestations to India, China is more focused on reviving economic growth in East and South-east Asia. For India too, any deterioration in relations with China is a costly diversion of governmental attention at a time when the economy should occupy everyone’s mind space. China should not worry too much about the Dalai Lama’s visit to Arunachal Pradesh, nor should the visit itself be seen as an act of bravado or defiance. The sooner China is able to conduct a normal dialogue with the Dalai Lama the better it is for all concerned. Prime Minister Singh was right to emphasise the fact that India, as much of the world, views him as a religious and spiritual leader and not a political leader.
Relationship with China is the most complex foreign policy challenge for India and much of China’s neighbours. China can afford to do more than it has done so far to reassure its neighbours, especially developing countries, that its rise would not threaten them. With respect to India, China can do more than it has done so far to re-assure New Delhi. To begin with, it should show more interest in border talks, which seem to have lost their way after a promising resumption in 2005, reduce its trade deficit with India and be more transparent on its exchange rate and trade promotion policies. Till China’s economic policies are more transparent, neither can it aspire for “market economy” status nor should we enter into a free trade agreement with it.
india needs an outspoken pm like george w bush. when he talks the world listen, because he talks with authority and make his words count. as for india Manmohan Singhs words are hardly heard so that is the reason china ignores him.At the moment china is using 1962 and poor india is scared and not defending the fact that it is 2009. china made improvements along its borders and what did it do in 47 years along the borders NOTHING. china can attack india within 24 hours , it has missiles and a fully fledged army that can attack meanwhile india has to still get things together. INDIA PLEASE LEARN WHAT HAPPENED 47YRS AGO MUST NOT HAPPEN NOW .
China's protest against PM's visit to Arunachal Prasesh. The question is what China has to do with, when PM visits to Arunachal Pradesh ? Arunachal Pradesh is an integral part of India and the Indian PM can visit any territory that comes under sovereign of India. We never had a problem on Chinese premier visit to Beijing,Taiwan,Penghu or Matsu. China should refrain from making such comments and its high time for the Indian politician to understand the severity of the issue and do some bold steps.
India needs to stop being spineless hypocrites. Either they need to back up their stated position that Tibet is part of China by returning Arunachal Pradesh which is historically part of Tibet beyond dispute OR they have to state that Tibet is not part of China. Clearly the current position of agreeing with most of the governments in the world that Tibet is part of China and then occupying a part of Tibet isn't working.
Content Guide
