Business Standard
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Sponsored by  
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
||||Economy & Policy||||| 
 Section Home | News Now | Today's Paper | Features & Analysis | Politics & Public Affairs | Q&A | Columnists | BS Says
Home > Economy & Policy Live Markets | Commodities
 

Karat attacks Buddhadeb on Nandigram episode
Saubhadra Chatterji / Vijayawada Aug 09, 2010, 00:39 IST

Admits that creation of the Third Front was a wrong move.

Prakash Karat Under attack, the CPI(M)’s powerful General Secretary Prakash Karat has turned the heat on the Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee-led West Bengal lobby for the downslide of the party. Karat, the theory-loving boss of the party, has argued that the Nandigram episode, where 16 people were killed in police firing in early 2007, had ruined the party that built its strength through land struggles. In his remarks at the CPI(M)’s closed-door extended Central Committee meet here, Karat said the party had “compromised” on its basic ideological stand during the Nandigram incident.

But he had to eat humble pie and admit that the ‘third alternative’ initiative before the 2009 elections was a wrong move. The political situation was not favourable for such an alternative, he observed.

The party is also going to admit that it “underestimated” the strength of the Congress and “overestimated” its own power. In a press conference, Karat later said: “Many resolutions adopted in Coimbatore during the party congress in 2008 were correct. Maybe we couldn’t properly implement some of them.”

In what is seen as a clear snub to West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee and his industrialisation initiatives, Karat said in the meeting that Nandigram had weakened the CPI(M)’s basic stand and initiatives on land reforms. He had warned the comrades that “at no cost” the party could allow its land struggles wither. While in other parts of India there was a resistance against special economic zones, Nandigram happened in Bengal, he said.

“The Maharashtra government’s path is not our path,” Karat said in front of a captive audience, underlining that the party could not afford to severe ties with “people and land”.

Delegates from many north Indian states and Tripura also severely criticised Bhattacharjee for his anti-Bandh stand.

Bhattacharjee was not present when Karat made these remarks. Later, Karat told at a press conference: “We have always been in favour of acquiring land with the consent of the people. After Nandigram, it became more relevant to implement this policy.”

A prominent Central Committee member told Business Standard, “A party that built its base through land reforms in West Bengal and land struggles, suddenly lost its high moral and political ground, as it was seen grabbing land from farmers.”

“While we always advocated taking people along with us, building consensus and making people understand before taking any step, in Nandigram we didn’t follow these thumb rules. We tried to forcibly take land through administrative and police forces,” the committee member said.

The stand of Karat is seen as a counter-offensive to stave off the heat. While the Bengal lobby wants to blame Karat for the party’s debacle, Karat wants to show that actually the Bengal lobby created problems for the party at the national level.

He also strongly defended the decision to withdraw support from the first United Progressive Alliance government in 2008, terming it “correct”. He said the Left parties had no other option but to withdraw, as they couldn’t be seen as a party to the government’s strategic alliance with the imperialist US.

“We thought the Congress could never go without our approval. We thought we are the masters of the Congress and were over-confident of having a record number of 60 Left MPs. But finally, the Congress betrayed us,” said a politburo member.

The party will also admit that it couldn’t make people understand the reasons for its withdrawal of support as it failed to campaign properly.

“The timing of support withdrawal was also right. It is not true that the Bengal unit needed time and so we allowed the Congress to go to the International Atomic Energy Agency to buy time. Had we given something to the Samajwadi Party (SP) on their own terms, it would not have gone to support the Congress. But we were not in a position to help SP,” said a politburo member.

New Ipad Application :Business Standard's all new IPad App
Click here to download for free
Arrow Other Stories     
- Markets end on a strong note
- Nabard FY14 operating surplus soars 28% to Rs 1,635 cr
- RBI eases banks' term deposit restrictions
- NMDC Q4 net down 21.74% to Rs 1,642.28 cr
- Balrampur Chini Q4 profit up by 15%
  Read Business news in 
- Journey on, We are by Your Side. Click here to know more
- Help a Child Achieve her. Click to know more
- Benefits Upto Rs. 2.36 Lakhs on the Fully Loaded TJet Petrol.
- The Best Seller is Also the No. 1 in Mileage. Click here
- Watch The Film Here. Click here to know more..
- Leader in Passenger Car & Automobile Tyres. Click here
- 1 billion in saving for Unilever without any tangles.
- Learn How One City is Running on FOOD SCRAPS.
- One Partnership Endless Possibilities. Click here to know more
- Helping doctors detect diseases earlier, saving costs & extending lives.
- 36 Lakhs can get you a pool of Luxuries. Click here
- Which is the best plan for your daughter
- Check out the TRUE COLOURS of your Stocks, Now for FREE!
- One of the leading business schools in the world.Know More
Sorry, comments to this story are closed
Latest Messages
Posted by: Dave Jones
Karat attacks Buddhadeb on Nandigram episode Saubhadra Chatterji / Vijayawada August 9, 2010, 0:39 IST Karat attacks Buddhadeb on Nandigram episode Admits that creation of the Third Front was a wrong move. - Karat extends olive branch to Buddha Buddha to skip crucial days of CPI(M) Vijaywada meet Just a reminder to Shri Shri KARAT, "MAKE YOUR MIND UP" GET TO KNOW PEOPLE. Thanks
Posted by: Swapan Das
The writer, I think, intentionally used the word 'attacks', where as CPI(M) central committee admitted that the state committee made some misjudgement about Nandigram. The writer should be aware that at the same time, Karat on behalf of the party fully supported Buddhadev as well as the sate committee regarding Singur. Any way I am not blaming the writer for distorting what happened at Vijawada.
Table for Two
  Now available at Special price
  Rs.280/- Only

  Buy Now
BS POLL
UPA 2 has completed three years. How do you rate its performance?  Read the story
  Good
  Average
  Bad
Submit
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- IPL victory puts KKR in the black
- Re fall has minor impact on India?s rating, says Moody?s
- No diesel price hike for now, says Reddy
- From virtual world, hacktivism spills into real world
- Air India board refers Boeing compensation issue to govt
 
 More  
New Ipad Application
 Business Standard's all new IPad  App
 Click here to download for free
  Hot Searches  
 
Apalya |  Air India |  GAAR |  Agni  |  Solar eclipse |  Satyamev Jayate |  SRK |  Aamir Khan |  IPL |  Ertiga |  Sarfaesi Act |  Vodafone |  JP Morgan |  Transfer pricing |  Rupee |  Kingfisher Airlines |  Silver |  Provident Fund |  income tax refund |  iPhone |  Reliance Industries |  SEBI |  BSNL |  BSE |  NSE |  Mukesh Ambani |  Anil Ambani |  Infosys |  Pranab Mukherjee |  Sonia Gandhi |  Rahul Gandhi |  New Pension Scheme |  Reliance |  RBI |  GDP |  Gold |  Ratan Tata |  ICICI |  B-School |  Sensex |  Tax calculator |  Home Loan |  Personal Finance |  inflation |  oil prices |  Barack Obama |   
 
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter Portfolio Tracker
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring BS Books
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World | General News
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Contact Us