Business Standard
Thursday, May 31, 2012
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
|Markets & Investing|||||||| 
 Section Home | News Now | Paper | Features | Q&A | PF News | PF Features | IPOs | MFs | Commodities | Trends | Stock Data | Financials | Money & Forex
Home > Markets & Investing Live Markets | Commodities
 

PSUs fail to meet Sebi criterion on directors
Vandana / Mumbai Dec 26, 2009, 00:58 IST

Disinvestment plans likely to get delayed in 21 out of 43 listed companies

Twenty-one out of 43 listed public sector undertakings (PSUs) do not have the required number of independent directors, as stipulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi).

The major PSUs, according to Directorsdatabase.com, that fail to comply with the criterion under Clause 49 of Sebi regulations are National Mineral Development Corporation (NMDC), Minerals and Metals Trading Corporation (MMTC), Steel Authority of India, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, Indian Oil Corporation and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited.

This comes at a time when disinvestment is high on the government’s agenda and a number of PSU follow-on offers are expected to hit the market. For instance, a follow-on offer of NMDC, which aims to divest 8.38 per cent stake, recently got approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs. It plans to raise up to $3 billion (Rs 14,000 crore).

Experts said the issue might take longer than necessary to hit the market. The government will have to appoint independent directors on the boards of these companies before they proceed with the follow-on offers. Other PSUs that are in the race include NTPC, Rural Electrification Corporation (REC) and MMTC. REC has already filed the prospectus with Sebi.

Clause 49 of the listing agreement sets out definition and responsibilities of independent directors, board procedure, tenure of non-executive directors, requirements related to audit committees, role and periodicity of meeting of audit committee and board disclosure-risk management, among other things. As per the norms mandated by Sebi since January 2006, any listed firm must have at least half of its board constituted by independent directors or non-executive directors, if the chairman is an executive. In case the chairman is a non-executive, the rules demand that at least one-third of the board should comprise independent directors.

“Availability of good independent directors is a huge challenge. While there is a lot of demand for good independent directors, private sector companies are able to pay hefty compensation to attract them. PSUs do not agree to the kind of compensation structures that the private sector pays. The compensation has gone up to Rs 30-40 lakh a year for people who are offering professional advice on the board as independent directors. On the supply side, many directors are choosy about the companies they want to join. Getting good and professional advisors to join the board is a major task today,” said Ashvin Parekh, industry leader-financial services at Ernst & Young.
 

COMPLIANCE CALL
Non-compliant PSUs in terms of number of independent directors, as on December 21, 2009
* Andrew Yule & Co. Ltd. * Indian Oil Corp. Ltd.
* BEML Ltd. * Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.
* Bharat Electronics Ltd. * Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd.
* Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. * MMTC Ltd.
* Chennai Petroleum Corp. Ltd. * NMDC Ltd.
* Container Corp. of India Ltd. * Oil & Natural Gas Corp. Ltd.
* Dredging Corp. of India Ltd. * Power Finance Corp. Ltd.
* Gail (India) Ltd. * Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd.
* Hindustan Copper Ltd. * State Trading Corp. of India Ltd.
* Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. * Steel Authority of India Ltd.
* HMT Ltd.

It is not just listed PSUs. Even the unlisted ones such as Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited, which proposes an initial public offer (IPO), and Coal India have been going slow on appointment of independent directors. Two of the major IPOs that came out this year — NHPC and Oil India — were delayed by more than a year as they were unable to meet Sebi criteria on independent directors.

Prithvi Haldea, managing director, Prime Database, said, “It is time that Sebi and the government relooked at this requirement for the PSUs. While Sebi insists on this compliance at the time of an IPO, it has not been able to ensure the same post listing, especially in the case of PSUs. Future IPOs of PSUs that everyone has been waiting for are presently deficient on the number, and if the past is any indication, these IPOs may get delayed because of this reason. PSUs are already subjected to several additional scrutiny/audit from CVC (Central Vigilance Commission), CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General) and Parliament, hence, they should be exempted from this requirement.”

New Ipad Application :Business Standard's all new IPad App
Click here to download for free
Arrow Other Stories     
- Markets end lower ahead of May F&O expiry
- Parsvnath posts Rs 23 cr loss in Q4
- Educomp net down 57% at Rs 61 cr in Jan-Mar qtr
- DLF Q4 net plunges 39% to Rs 211 cr
- Provogue Q4 net profit down 71% at Rs 1.81 cr
  Read Business news in 
- India's no. 1 Property Site. Click here to know more
- 
- "Discover The Power of One"
- Help a Child Achieve her. Click to know more
- Watch The Film Here. Click here to know more..
- Learn How One City is Running on FOOD SCRAPS.
- 1 billion in saving for Unilever without any tangles.
- A Brand New Server at a Price That Fits Your Budget. Click here
- One Partnership Endless Possibilities. Click here to know more
- Helping doctors detect diseases earlier, saving costs & extending lives.
- Which is the best plan for your daughter
- Check out the TRUE COLOURS of your Stocks, Now for FREE!
- One of the leading business schools in the world.Know More
- 2 Lac Apartments, 1 Lac House / Plots. Click here
Sorry, comments to this story are closed
Latest Messages
Posted by: dr.m.narayana.bhat
though a national shame,one is not surprised by the headline 'psu's fail...' this is how the govt. practices corporate governance there is utter neglect of minority interest. disinvestment is only a source of raising funds, not being accountable for its use. what more can you expect when 'self' is in the forefront?
BS POLL
UPA 2 has completed three years. How do you rate its performance?  Read the story
  Good
  Average
  Bad
Submit
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- Vodafone notice on arbitration premature: Govt
- Coal blocks for infrastructure projects get GoM nod
- Tata Motors skids as margins dip at JLR
- Dissidence brewing in state: Senior BJP leaders team up against Modi
- Rupee-sensitive stocks risky for new investors
 
 More  
Tax Shastra
  Now available at Special price
  Rs. 360/- Only

  Buy Now
Table for Two
  Now available at Special price
  Rs.280/- Only

  Buy Now
 
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter Portfolio Tracker
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring BS Books
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World | General News
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Contact Us