|
| Raju confesses to fraud, quits | |
| BS Reporters / New Delhi/mumbai January 8, 2009, 0:23 IST | |
Disclosure after DSP Merrill Lynch discovers irregularities; Company sets up SWAT team.
In one of the darkest days in India’s corporate history, Satyam Computer Services Founder and Chairman B Ramalinga Raju resigned after saying he falsified earnings and assets.
The revelation comes soon after Raju was forced to reverse a decision to invest almost Rs 8,000 crore in two other promoter-owned infrastructure and property companies mid-December, following strong shareholder protests. The company has been in crisis since, after four independent directors resigned from Satyam’s board as a result of widespread criticism of their role in the decision.
Today’s disclosures, however, prompted a collapse in the stock of India’s fourth-largest software services company. Satyam, whose name means “the truth” in Sanskrit, plunged a record 78 per cent on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), dragging down the Sensitive Index in a scandal described as “horrifying” by Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) Chairman C B Bhave.
The National Stock Exchange has excluded Satyam, which has received several prominent awards for corporate governance in the past, from the Nifty 50 and S&P CNX 500 with effect from January 12.
A BSE spokesman said the bourse will examine whether to remove Satyam from the Sensitive Index, which tumbled 7.3 per cent today. Meanwhile, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) today halted trading in Satyam stock. In the pre-market trade, the company’s American Depository Receipt (ADR) had crashed 91 per cent on the NYSE.
Raju’s letter to the company’s board said he tried to sell two promoter-related firms to Satyam last month, in a final attempt to plug Rs 5,500 crore of “fictitious” cash on the company’s balance sheet. Profits have been “inflated for several years,” Raju said.
TRUE LIES
(What Raju owned up to) |
| * Inflated cash and bank balances of Rs 5,040 crore |
| * Non-existent accrued interest of Rs 376 crore |
| * Understated liabilities of Rs 1,230 crore on account of funds arranged by Raju |
| * Overstated debtor position of Rs 490 crore |
| * Q2 ‘08-09 profit stated as Rs 2,700 crore and operating margin of 24% revenues. Actuals: Rs 2,112 crore profit and 3% of revenues |
| * Profits inflated over “last several years”; attained unmanageable levels as company grew |
| * Aborted Maytas deal was “an attempt to fill the fictitious assets with real ones” |
| Source: Letter to Bombay Stock Exchange |
Of Satyam’s reported cash and bank balances of Rs 5,361 crore on September 30, Rs 5,004 crore was non-existent, Raju said in the letter. Operating margin for the quarter ending September 30 was 3 per cent of revenue, instead of the reported 24 per cent, he said. The company’s revenue was Rs 2,100 crore, 22 per cent less than the inflated figure of Rs 2,700 crore that had been reported.
Raju arranged Rs 1,230 crore “to keep operations going” at Satyam over the last two years by pledging the founders’ shares and raising funds from other sources, he said.
“What started as a marginal gap between actual operating profit and the one reflected in the books of accounts continued to grow over the years,” Raju said. “It was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten.”
Raju, who was barricaded in his Hyderabad office all day today, said his concern was that poor performance, combined with the fact that promoters held a small stake in the company, would make Satyam an easy target for a takeover, exposing the inflated figures.
B Rama Raju, managing director of the company, also resigned today. Both will, however, continue in the position till the current board is expanded. Ram Mynampati, president (commercial and healthcare business), has been appointed interim CEO.
Meanwhile, the company has formed a SWAT team consisting of senior leaders — many of them Satyam veterans with a minimum experience of 10 years in the company and more than 20 years in the industry — to steer the company through the crisis.
Swift action: After Raju’s disclosure this morning, the government and regulators swung into action quickly. Sebi said a probe team will visit Satyam’s offices in Hyderabad Thursday to inspect the company’s accounts. Meanwhile, the corporate affairs ministry has given the Registrar of Companies (RoC), Hyderabad, time till January 14 to submit a report on the statement sent by Raju. Minister of Corporate Affairs Premchand Gupta said: “No leniency will be shown to those found guilty.”
Satyam’s auditors — PricewaterhouseCoopers — also came under fire, with the Institute of Chartered Accountants saying it will take action after investigations.
Sources familiar with the developments said Raju was forced to make this revelation after DSP Merrill Lynch, which was appointed by Satyam to look for a partner or buyer for the company a week ago, terminated its engagement with the company after it found financial irregularities. Merrill Lynch is also understood to have sent the information and the reason for their termination of the contract to the BSE, Sebi and even the New York Stock Exchange, on which Satyam is listed. This left Raju with no other option but to resign.
Raju said he was “submitting himself to the laws of the land and the consequences thereof” but corporate lawyers said the Companies Act, 1956, provides for imprisonment for up to two years for providing false statements. Section (628) also has provision for a fine. In addition, the government has the power to suspend the entire board in the interest of the shareholders and appoint directors.
The government can either initiate suo motu action against the company, based on reports available so far, or wait for the report from RoC before taking action. The ministry of corporate affairs has a serious fraud office (SFO), which was set up to investigate offences of this nature.
“This is a clear criminal breach of trust,” said Somasekhar Sundaresan, partner of J Sagar Associates, adding that the company violated Sebi (Prohibition of Fradulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to the Securities Market) Regulations, 2003, under which “making a statement or purveying information by a person which he does not believe to be true is an offence”.
Assessing the damage: “This quarter will be tumultuous for us,” interim CEO Ram Mynampati said in an emailed statement to Satyam’s employees. “Rumours will abound and it would be fair to assume that competition will try to leverage it to their advantage.”
Mynampati, who has been mandated by the board to steer the company through this crisis, expressed “shock” at the disclosures. “We recognise that our associates have committed a significant part of their careers to build Satyam. We will pursue all avenues to secure their future in the company,” Mynampati added.
Satyam will hold a press conference at its headquarters in Hyderabad in the next 24 hours.
Employees confused: However, Satyam’s over 53,000 employees are not impressed. “We have been trying to get in touch with our seniors but they have simply vanished,” said a mid-managerial level employee. The top management, said employees, have been “avoiding talks with junior and mid-level employees”.
They maintain that the management didn’t bother clarifying matters when independent directors resigned from Satyam, nor were they forthcoming about Raju’s resignation.
Most Satyam employees were shocked to see Raju owning up to fraud. An employee, who has been working in Satyam for seven months, said, “He was our hero and we felt privileged to be a part of the Satyam family. But now, we can only worry about what our position will be if another company takes over.”
Future tense: Satyam may also lose clients, and become an unattractive proposition — both for investors and outsourcing companies, analysts said. Sudin Apte of Forrester asserts that “30 to 50 per cent of Satyam’s clients will review their deals”. These, he explained, are primarily the 100-odd clients that have deals of around $1 million or less. He added that “Satyam’s attraction as a company has decreased, and this also result in a slightly lower enthusiasm to buy from Indian players”. But will India’s outsourcing/offshoring image also take a hit? Nasscom president Som Mittal, said: “We are shocked with the disclosure of both the magnitude and content of fraud. The IT-BPO industry has high sets of corporate governance and this is an isolated case of governance failure. We are closely working with the Task Force set up by Satyam and our priority at this point is the 50,000 employees and customers of the company.”
Commenting on whether the software body will take any action against Satyam, Mittal said, “There are enough provisions in the law and we are not taking any action. The company will remain on Nasscom’s list. Also, the blame for such an isolated incident should not be put on the entire country or industry because such incidents have taken place in Europe and more recently, in the US.”
Funds exit: Some of the big institutional shareholders have already started exiting the company. On the BSE and NSE today, these shareholders sold 8.62 per cent of their combined holdings. Abardeen, one of the largest shareholders, sold the entire 5.6 per cent stake it had in Satyam, and Swiss Finance also exited. Stock Exchange data showed huge sales by Morgan Stanley and Fidelity as well.
Shock & dismay: The reaction from India Inc was one of shock and dismay. Infosys, India’s second-largest software company, called the incident “deplorable,” R C Bhargava, Chairman, Maruti Suzuki (and an independent director on many boards) admitted that “the Satyam episode has tarnished the image of independent directors at Satyam.” He wondered how the internal audit committee (mostly populated by independent directors) could have missed the irregularities.
JJ Irani, Chairman of expert committee to draft the new Companies Act, Director of Tata Sons, said, “This is a lesson for corporate houses and they should wake up to reality. In the new companies Act, we proposed to give more powers to independent directors. They are completely in the dark. They should be well informed and kept active.”
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP and President, Ficci, said, “This fraud on the investors and employees of the company shows a systemic breakdown in the audit and board oversight of the company. Questions will need to be asked about how this happened and who caused it to happen,” he added.
CII Director General Chandrajit Banerjee said the developments at Satyam need to be seen as exceptions to the rule because standards of corporate governance in India are among the highest in the world today.
Brokerage houses, on their part, were blunt. Hitesh Agrawal, Head (Research), Angel Broking, said: “This has shaken the confidence of investors — both domestic and global — the repercussions of which could be felt over the medium-term”.
In its note to its investors on Wednesday, CLSA, a brokerage house covering the Asia-Pacific markets, said: “In this scenario, the January 10 board meeting of Satyam now becomes irrelevant. When there is no cash, how can there be a buyback? And where did the cash go? Only an investigation can tell.”
A Credit Suisse statement, too, said the Satyam episode “clearly indicates that the current financials of Satyam cannot be relied upon. As such, we are unable to issue any further investment advice on Satyam and suspend our coverage of the stock”.
SHOCK, AWE & DISGUST
Reactions from India Inc |
The next time you hear of a growth story, you may wonder whether it is ‘Satyam’ or ‘Mythyam’
— Kapil Dev Singh, Country Manager, IDC India |
We condemn and deplore the whole incident
— Suresh Senapati, CFO, Wipro Ltd. |
I am stunned
— Mendu Rammohan Rao, Dean, ISB, and former Satyam independent director |
Strong corporate governance must always be on top of an organisation’s agenda
— Kumar Mangalam Birla, chairman, Aditya Birla group |
Raju was our hero and we felt privileged to be part of the Satyam family. Now, we can only worry about our position if another company takes over — Satyam employee
|
A truly shocking and mind-numbing development in Indian corporate and stockmarket history
— Hitesh Agrawal, Head (Research), Angel Broking |
Very, very shocking
— Rostow Ravanan, CFO, MindTree |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
Discussion Board
/ User Comments (19) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Anti-Raju |
January 09 , 2009 ,23:38 IST |
|
|
| Ki Raju ban gaya gentleman, ki raju ban gaya gentleman.
Oh wait... |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| aniket |
January 08 , 2009 ,14:58 IST |
|
|
| Did Raju Really Become A Gentleman or a Multi-Billionaire Overnight? |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shriidharkulkarni |
January 08 , 2009 ,13:45 IST |
|
|
| This is indeed shoccking.. The obsession of Corporates to show higher profits quarter on quarter forces the managements to resort to this kind of dubious practices. The shareholders too need to be reasonable in their expectations from the companies they invest their money in.
I wonder what was the audit team doing all these years?And what about the role of various regulators like ROC, Stock exchanges and SEBI etc? The corporates are only paying lip service to Corporate Governance. |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PRABUCHENNAI |
January 08 , 2009 ,13:38 IST |
|
|
| I feel, after being Disclosed, all the hands in SATYAM board should be analysed, because It cannot be,,only Raju have played the Episode. Atleast few others would have known this and they failed to blow the whistle, now Asking for SoS. All the legal elements should be strengthened before they find the safe Exit or loop holes. Periodic and random audits or Reviews should be performed ogainst all IT -BPO giants in India to avoid simila shockwaves in future. |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Varun |
January 08 , 2009 ,12:30 IST |
|
|
| This has been a shocking incident & guilty must be punished severly so as to set as example for any such coporate which tries to play with the centiments & trust of the common public . Also a regualar postmortem ofthe companies financials must be carried out by Independent Government Bodies to help the common stakeholders & protect their hard earned money . |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| vilas |
January 08 , 2009 ,11:48 IST |
|
|
| I agree with Dhaval. He should be put away for 50-60 years as they do in the US. You want all the facilities and lifestyle of the US, so you must also be ready to accept their compliance systems |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| jalaramaiah |
January 08 , 2009 ,11:33 IST |
|
|
| This is a serious unpardonable crime and breach of trust in corporate management on a mega scale which went on undetected for years. such crimes deserve deterrent punishment under all relevant applicable laws, to all those connected with it in some way or other who may include chairman,ceos,whole time directors and auditors. Besides barring and disqualifying them permanently to hold such posts,Independent Directors should also not be spared for derelection of functions expected of them. |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Surana |
January 08 , 2009 ,10:47 IST |
|
|
| It is sad situation for the Corporate Governance.
The ICAI need to act swiftly, rather than waiting for a complaint from some one to assess why and how this can happen. cash and bank balances and accrued interest are subject to direct verification in the form of Direct confirmation,
This cannot be missed by internal or external auditors.
The ICAI need to introduce without any further delay , the rule of Rotation of auditors every four years and make it mandatory.
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| soumen_7 |
January 08 , 2009 ,10:07 IST |
|
|
| 6.Transperant reporting mechanism inclusive of operational details.
7.ICAI,ICWAI and ICSI powers should be clipped to being an education regulator(IPD and CPD) and other regulation should be through independant body which will include discipline compliance,standard setting,audit profession et al.
MCA should take immediate initiative on these line to restore investor confidence and stakeholderscomfort.
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| soumen_7 |
January 08 , 2009 ,10:06 IST |
|
|
| The rectification is possible only if the law makers think of the following:
1.Audit rotation like the one done by C&AG and RBI.
2.Auditor rotation during audit periods determined in 1 above.
3.Independant audit profession regulator...like in many countries...ASIC,RSB,IRBA PCAOB.
4.Competition among accounting professionals with level playing field for cost accountants and others,(ASIC does that so do RQB).
5.SEBI taking over the role of accounting regulator.
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| soumen_7 |
January 08 , 2009 ,10:05 IST |
|
|
| The scam seems to be a tip of an iceberg not only for satyam but also the whole lot of corporates indulging in window dressing for years with complicity of auditors who become family members of the corporates. |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| soumen_7 |
January 08 , 2009 ,10:04 IST |
|
|
| The Scam has occured in current assets and liabilities section or working capital fraud!
Statutory auditors are primarily responsible for certifying fictitious cash balance and that is grave not only onaccount of apparent complicity but also a shame on an accountant expositing lack of primary knowledge reflecting the training he or she had in all these years. |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| soumen_7 |
January 08 , 2009 ,10:03 IST |
|
|
| The Satyam as it has revealed is bigger in volume than could have ever imagined....A Whopping 8000 crore fake numbers.
This primarily reveals that system of double entry is prone to manipulation if the auditors limit to balance-sheet audit.
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pathikrit |
January 08 , 2009 ,09:24 IST |
|
|
| The alleged gag order imposed by PWC management on its employees with regards to the Satyam fiasco should be investigated.
Prima facie it seems like a case of the obstruction to justice.Under normal circumstances client confidentiality is respected by law, but the fraud committed by the Rajus and complicity of the auditors are inherently intertwined.
In such circumstances PWC management should not only be thoroughly investigated for complicity, if any, but also obstruction to justice. |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| KRISHNAN.KERAL |
January 08 , 2009 ,08:45 IST |
|
|
| TO RESOLVE SATYAM CRISES,I AM INTRUDUCING ONE 0PTION IN FRONT OF MINISRTY OF FINANCE,INFERMATION TECNOLOGY.
ALSO NASSCOM , DIRECTOR BOARD OF SATYAM COMPUTORS,INFOSYS TECNOLOGY AND TATA CUNSULTUNCY.
MERGER OR TAKE OVER SATYAM COMPUTORS BY LEADING IT FIRMS INFOSYS OR TCS. THIS IS THE INTREREST OF THE INVESTERS ,EMPLOYEES AND INDIAN IT INDUSTRY.
THE PROMOTORS HAD NO RIGHT AT PRESENT THAT, THEIR SHARES IN SATYAM ALREADY HYPOTHICATED AT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND THEY SELL AT GENERAL PUBLIC |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| localyokel |
January 08 , 2009 ,07:28 IST |
|
|
| hindsight is a great weapon in the hands of the layreader.Something that ordinary,and corporate investors dont have in their quest to maximise ROI.
Having said that, it would be only wise to clarify that there are numerous small/medium firms who are listed on the stock market only in name.their shares dont get traded, their earnings are suspect and independent directors suitably neutered so as to toe the line of the primary stakeholder.
Be afraid.Be very afraid. |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dhaval |
January 08 , 2009 ,04:21 IST |
|
|
| Such big fraud and only 2 years terms in jail? Raju should be spending 50-60 years in jail for cheating investors and ruining their money. |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adi |
January 08 , 2009 ,03:52 IST |
|
|
| Raju should have sorted out this mess within the company. His disclosure has created a very very bad impression for entire IT industry of India. |
|
Reply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|