Business Standard
Thursday, Feb 16, 2012
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
||Companies & Industry||||||| 
 Section Home | News Now | Today's Paper | Q&A | People in the News | Industry News | Features | The Compass | Research & Analysis | Opinion | Corporate Results
Home > Companies & Industry Live Markets | Commodities
 

Satyam violated company law: RoC
Surajeet Das Gupta / New Delhi Jan 21, 2009, 00:28 IST

Hope for Satyam even as investigations reveal more skeletons.

The Registrar of Companies (RoC) in Hyderabad has said it found preliminary evidence that Satyam Computers had violated key provisions of the Companies Act in its controversial December 16 proposal to acquire two promoter-related companies.

 Click here for Cloud Computing
 
The RoC’s report was submitted to the department of corporate affairs a few days before Satyam founder Ramalinga Raju’s confessions to a massive accounting fraud January 7 in India's fourth-largest software services firm.

Satyam was forced to withdraw the proposals December 16 following strong shareholder objections. Raju later said the acquisitions were an attempt to make good gaps in cash flows on Satyam's books.

The RoC’s findings — which it said will be made final after all documents are made available — suggest that in approving the acquisition of 100 per cent in Maytas Properties and 51 per cent in Maytas Infrastructure, Satyam’s board had violated Section 372A of the Companies Act.

Sub-section 1 of Section 372A stipulates that no company can acquire shares in any other “body corporate” through “subscription purchase or otherwise” for an amount exceeding 60 per cent of the acquiring company’s share capital and free reserves or 100 per cent of its free reserves, whichever is higher, after loans, guarantees and investments.

Doing so would require shareholder authorisation through a special resolution passed in a general meeting. The law also states that such a resolution has to be passed only through a postal ballot and with advance intimation to the RoC.

The RoC report pointed out that Satyam’s 2007-08 balance sheet shows total share capital and free reserves of Rs 2,136.37 crore; 60 per cent of this works out to Rs 1,281.82 crore and 100 per cent free reserves works out to 2,002.27 crore. As on March 31, 2008 the total amount of investments, loans and guarantees and outstanding amounts given by Satyam stood at Rs 493.80 crore. Therefore, Satyam could make further investments of up to Rs 788 crore without prior shareholder approval.

Satyam’s board — which included such prominent personalities as former cabinet secretary T R Prasad, Harvard Business School’s Krishna Paleppu, designer of the Pentium chip Vinod Dham, among others — approved a proposal to invest Rs 7,920 crore in the Maytas firms.

Violating Section 372A would make the officers-in-default (which include the managing director, company secretary and whole time director) liable for punishment, which includes a fine of Rs 50,000 or imprisonment up to two years.

The report also pointed out that Satyam has not filed any resolution as required by section 293 of the Companies Act regarding the nature and proposed acquisition of stakes in Maytas Infrastructure and Maytas Properties.

On the question of the alleged diversion of funds for the benefit of promoter companies, the RoC report said Satyam’s annual report reveals several transactions with subsidiaries and other group companies by way of investments, purchase of assets and other receivables.

The RoC has also raised questions on the applicability of sections 297, 299, 300 and 301 of the Act that deal with related party transactions like rules on broad sanctions for resolutions in which directors are interested. RoC said the books show that the Raju family and its holding companies own 36.4 per cent in Maytas Infrastructure and 100 per cent in Maytas Properties.

The RoC’s report added that the 2007-08 annual report of Maytas Properties also shows that the company had several transactions with group companies. The RoC said it looks apparent that the investments and loans made by Maytas Properties were far in excess of the limits laid down by Section 372A of the Companies Act

Against a paid up capital and free reserves of Rs 5 crore Maytas Properties had made an investment of Rs 90.25 crore and loans and advances to group companies of Rs 419.63 crore. Maytas Properties had received all the funds for these investments by way of unsecured loans (compulsory convertible debentures) of about Rs 600 crore.

The company also invested Rs 25.6 crore in 2 per cent redeemable convertible non-cumulative preference shares, and 10.5 per cent compulsory convertible debentures of Rs 3.6 crore in group companies at a rate of interest lower than the prevailing bank rate, which is also considered a violation of 372 of the Companies Act

Similarly, the 2007-08 annual report of Maytas Infastructure revealed that against a paid up capital and free reserves of Rs 301.417 crore , the company made investments of Rs 256.231 crore and advanced loans and advances to group companies of Rs 102.045 crore and guarantees of Rs 10 crore. The company received all the funds by way of a share issue of Rs 327.450 crore.

The report also pointed out that Satyam has not filed any resolution as required by section 293 of the Companies Act regarding the nature and proposed acquisition of stakes in Maytas Infrastructure and Maytas Properties.

On the question of the alleged diversion of funds for the benefit of promoter companies, the RoC report said Satyam’s annual report reveals several transactions with subsidiaries and other group companies by way of investments, purchase of assets and other receivables.

The RoC has also raised questions on the applicability of sections 297, 299, 300 and 301 of the Act that deal with related party transactions like rules on broad sanctions for resolutions in which directors are interested. RoC said the books show that the Raju family and its holding companies own 36.4 per cent in Maytas Infrastructure and 100 per cent in Maytas Properties.

The RoC’s report added that the 2007-08 annual report of Maytas Properties also shows that the company had several transactions with group companies. The RoC said it looks apparent that the investments and loans made by Maytas Properties were far in excess of the limits laid down by Section 372A of the Companies Act

Against a paid up capital and free reserves of Rs 5 crore Maytas Properties had made an investment of Rs 90.25 crore and loans and advances to group companies of Rs 419.63 crore. Maytas Properties had received all the funds for these investments by way of unsecured loans (compulsory convertible debentures) of about Rs 600 crore.

The company also invested Rs 25.6 crore in 2 per cent redeemable convertible non-cumulative preference shares, and 10.5 per cent compulsory convertible debentures of Rs 3.6 crore in group companies at a rate of interest lower than the prevailing bank rate, which is also considered a violation of 372 of the Companies Act

Similarly, the 2007-08 annual report of Maytas Infastructure revealed that against a paid up capital and free reserves of Rs 301.417 crore , the company made investments of Rs 256.231 crore and advanced loans and advances to group companies of Rs 102.045 crore and guarantees of Rs 10 crore. The company received all the funds by way of a share issue of Rs 327.450 crore.

New Ipad Application :Business Standard's all new IPad App
Click here to download for free
Arrow Other Stories     
- S&P reaches 7-month high before hitting wall
- World Bank President Zoellick to step down on June 30
- Oil cos cut jet fuel prices by Rs 350/kl
- Telcos operating profit to rise 5% in 2 yrs: Crisil
- PESB recommends SS Narsing Rao for CIL's top slot
  Read Business news in 
- Now property search gets more exciting than ever before!
- High Growth Business Opportunities in Africa - Register to explore
- Save over Rs.3000 with IndianOil Citibank Card
- We live for our family. have you secured them?
- India's No. 1 Property Site. Click here to know more..
- Diseases earlier, Saving Costs, Extending Lives. Know More..
- Get 5% cashback on telephone bills with Citi
- Enjoy the journey as much as the destination. click to know more..
- Exim Bank Conclave on India - Africa Project Partnership. Know more..
- Medium-sized businesses are the engines of a smarter planet.
- Be part of it The World's Largest Aircraft.
- Creating Wealth made simple the SIP way. Know more..
- Only Developer to give a guarantee on time space & rate.
- Office 365 for professionals and small businesses.
- Buy Your Property with Our Triple Guarantee in India.
- Improve Patient Care & Experience. Click here to know more
- Win a Business Class Ticket to Europe..Know more..
-  Introduce a New Automotive Luxury Car.. know more
- Health is Wealth..... Insurance + Savings... Know More...
Sorry, comments to this story are closed
Latest Messages
Posted by: shweta
the amount to be considered for further investment should be 2002.27 as higher is 100% of free reserve then why 60% of share capital and free reserve is considered question from writer
Posted by: Ranjeet
Whether the ROC needs to be proactive or reactive? Finally the ROC has waken up and blamed Satyam regarding the violations committed in company law. There are not many companies in India having free reserves to the tune of Rs. 7920 Crores or having free reserves & Capital more than 13200 crore. The deal should have come under the scanner of ROC the day it striked the headlines. The company secretary, an expert in company law, is the other culprit against whom strict action is warranted
Posted by: Ranjeet
Whether the ROC needs to be proactive or reactive? Finally the ROC has waken up and blamed Satyam regarding the violations committed in company law. There are not many companies in India having free reserves to the tune of Rs. 7920 Crores or having free reserves & Capital more than 13200 crore. The deal should have come under the scanner of ROC the day it striked the headlines. The company secretary, an expert in company law, is the other culprit against whom strict action is warranted
Posted by: munishrpsharma
The limit under 372A is 2027 crores and not 788 crores as higher of the 60% of paid up share capital and 100% of free reserves are to be considered. So the limit would be 2027 Crores and deduct the investments already made
Posted by: correction
In accordance with the provisions of Sec.372A the eligible amount should be Rs.2002.27 crores. Please confirm......
SmartInvestor+ E-zine
  Pay Rs.747/- for 3 years and
  get a branded watch FREE

  Subscribe Now
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- Nestle: Food for thought
- Kanika Datta: The importance of being SRK
- Tailor-made but not good enough
- Leela parts ways with Kempinski
- Tata Motors soars to record level as JLR propels profit
 
 More  
BUSINESS STANDARD INDIA 2012
  Now available at Special price
  Rs.395/- Only
  Buy Now
  Now available on the Kindle Store...
  BS Specials  
    Full coverage of elections in Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Manipur and Goa
 
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter Portfolio Tracker
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring BS Books
FOR HOT PRODUCTS
BS Bazaar.com
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Contact Us