Business Standard
Thursday, May 31, 2012
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
||||||||Technology| 
 Section Home | News Now | Features & Analysis | IT/ITES | Telecom | Hardware | Columnists | Gadgets & Gizmos
Home > Tech World Live Markets | Commodities
 

SC rejects government plea in S Tel case
BS Reporter / New Delhi Mar 13, 2010, 00:50 IST

Also accepts firm’s apology for taking up sub judice matter.

The Supreme Court today accepted an apology from S Tel, the telecom service provider, for having written to the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) on issues pending before the judges. The court had rapped the company and demanded an explanation.

However, in a blow to the government, the SC also upheld the S Tel case on the manner it which it had been earlier denied a telecom licence for various areas (circles). S Tel’s case on the matter had been upheld by a bench of the High Court of Delhi, and then by a larger bench of the same court when the government appealed. The government then chose to appeal to the SC.

The bench headed by Justice B Sudershan Reddy rejected the arguments of Attorney General G E Vahanvati that the HC judgment, if allowed to stand, would have serious implications in formulating future policies of the government in allocation of spectrum and in other matters. The bench not only rejected the argument but also allowed the criticism by the HC of the way the government had gone about the matter to stand.

The issue involved the government having suddenly advanced the cutoff date for considering applications for second-generation (2G) telecom licences. Both earlier HC verdicts indicted the government for doing so, adding that this seemed to have been done to benefit a few telecom companies.

The Attorney General argued that every applicant couldn’t claim a right to get a licence and the government only followed a ‘first come, first served’ policy; S Tel’s application wasn’t rejected, but only kept in abeyance, to be considered when more telecom spectrum became available.

The HC had said the communications ministry’s notification advancing the cut-off date for granting licences (from October 1 to September 25, 2007) was arbitrary and devoid of any rationale. And, the SC declined to allow the government plea or to remove these remarks.

S Tel is a joint venture between the Chennai-based Sivasankaran group (usually termed the Siva group) and Bahrain Telecom; the latter has a 42.7 per cent stake in it. It has 800,000 subscribers in the telecom circles of Himachal, Bihar and Orissa.

Its counsel told the SC that market conditions had changed drastically since 2007 and the earlier proposal (for telecom licences in certain circles) was no longer economically viable for it. He read out the apology filed in the court yesterday, which the judges accepted. He stated that the changed market conditions, severe competition, increase in number of operators in certain service areas and new technologies like 3G and 4G had forced the company to review its business strategy.

New Ipad Application :Business Standard's all new IPad App
Click here to download for free
Arrow Other Stories     
- Markets end lower ahead of May F&O expiry
- Parsvnath posts Rs 23 cr loss in Q4
- Educomp net down 57% at Rs 61 cr in Jan-Mar qtr
- DLF Q4 net plunges 39% to Rs 211 cr
- Provogue Q4 net profit down 71% at Rs 1.81 cr
  Read Business news in 
- India's no. 1 Property Site. Click here to know more
- Help a Child Achieve her. Click to know more
- Watch The Film Here. Click here to know more..
- 1 billion in saving for Unilever without any tangles.
- One Partnership Endless Possibilities. Click here to know more
- Helping doctors detect diseases earlier, saving costs & extending lives.
- Which is the best plan for your daughter
- Check out the TRUE COLOURS of your Stocks, Now for FREE!
- 2 Lac Apartments, 1 Lac House / Plots. Click here
Sorry, comments to this story are closed
Latest Messages
Table for Two
  Now available at Special price
  Rs.280/- Only

  Buy Now
BS POLL
UPA 2 has completed three years. How do you rate its performance?  Read the story
  Good
  Average
  Bad
Submit
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- Vodafone notice on arbitration premature: Govt
- Coal blocks for infrastructure projects get GoM nod
- Dissidence brewing in state: Senior BJP leaders team up against Modi
- Tata Motors skids as margins dip at JLR
- Rupee-sensitive stocks risky for new investors
 
 More  
New Ipad Application
 Business Standard's all new IPad  App
 Click here to download for free
  Hot Searches  
 
Apalya |  Air India |  GAAR |  Agni  |  Solar eclipse |  Satyamev Jayate |  SRK |  Aamir Khan |  IPL |  Ertiga |  Sarfaesi Act |  Vodafone |  JP Morgan |  Transfer pricing |  Rupee |  Kingfisher Airlines |  Silver |  Provident Fund |  income tax refund |  iPhone |  Reliance Industries |  SEBI |  BSNL |  BSE |  NSE |  Mukesh Ambani |  Anil Ambani |  Infosys |  Pranab Mukherjee |  Sonia Gandhi |  Rahul Gandhi |  New Pension Scheme |  Reliance |  RBI |  GDP |  Gold |  Ratan Tata |  ICICI |  B-School |  Sensex |  Tax calculator |  Home Loan |  Personal Finance |  inflation |  oil prices |  Barack Obama |   
 
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter Portfolio Tracker
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring BS Books
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World | General News
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Contact Us