Business Standard
Thursday, May 31, 2012
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
|Markets & Investing|||||||| 
 Section Home | News Now | Paper | Features | Q&A | PF News | PF Features | IPOs | MFs | Commodities | Trends | Stock Data | Financials | Money & Forex
Home > Markets & Investing Live Markets | Commodities
 

Sebi bans promoters, merchant banks for irregularities in 7 IPOs
Bs Reporters / Mumbai Dec 29, 2011, 00:22 IST

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) on Wednesday cracked down on promoters, key officials and directors, including independent directors, of issuer firms, merchant bankers and stock market operators involved in several irregularities in seven recent initial public offerings (IPOs). Over 100 entities involved in these IPOs are banned from the securities market with immediate effect.

Prashant Saran, whole time member, Sebi, passed these interim orders, allowing the aggrieved 21 days to respond.

Sebi said it had started an investigation of these companies after it found wide price fluctuations on listing. The investigation primarily focused on the verification of disclosures made in the offer document, the examination of the bidding pattern, the trading on the first day of listing and the utilisation of IPO proceeds vis-à-vis what is stated in the offer document.

It found irregularities in the cases of Taksheel Solutions, PG Electr-oplast, Brooks Laboratories, RDB Rasayans, Tijaria polypipes, Bhar-atiya Global and Onelife Capital Advisors. Of these, six companies are trading below their issue prices as of date. The majority of these issues, which raised between Rs 35 crore and Rs 120 crore, hit the market in September-October, a time when most large companies were finding it difficult to raise money. All these companies are now banned from raising fresh capital. However, Sebi has not banned trading on these stocks.

Apart from Onelife Capital, a merchant banker that raised Rs 36.85 crore through one of the IPOs, Sebi has banned five merchant bankers who had managed these IPOs. In the case of Tijaria Polypipes, there was no directive against the merchant bankers. Atherstone Capital, Almondz Global, D&A Financial services, Chartered capital and PNB investment Services are the other merchant bankers barred from primary markets.

A major irregularity found was the siphoning out of money through inter-corporate deposits (ICDs). In many cases, Sebi found the status of clients and vendors of the company and the fund flow between the company and clients and vendors was abnormal. This money was, in turn, used to boost the stock prices on listing.

For Taksheel Solutions, Sebi found “a part of the proceeds of the issue had been siphoned off in a circuitous route to certain entities and operators, the top net buyers on stock exchanges on the listing day.”

In the case of Brooks Labs, some of the funds received in the IPO were also found to have been transferred through layers to Overall Financial, which traded in the scrip and recorded losses. “Thus, prima facie, it indicates an exit was given to motivated bidders,” the Sebi order said.

UNDER THE SCANNER
  Issue size (Rs cr) Date of list % chg
Issue price Dec 28,’11 % chg
Taksheel Solutions 82.5 Oct 19,’11 150 14.8 -90.1
RDB Rasayans 35.55 Oct 7,’11 79 9.3 -88.2
Brooks Laboratories 63 Sep 5,’11 100 14.75 -85.3
PG Electroplast 120.64 Sep 26,’11 210 190.75 -9.2
Onelife Capital 
Advisors
36.85 Oct 17,’11 110 243.10 121
Tijaria 60 Oct 12,’11 60 10 -83.3
Bharatiya Global  55 Jul 28,’11 82 9.25 -88.7
Data compiled by BS Research Bureau

For most of these firms, Sebi has asked these to call back the ICDs placed with related firms. Taksheel has been asked to call back Rs 23 crore and place the proceeds in an interest bearing escrow bank account. Brooks Labs shall call back ICDs advanced by it to Suryamukhi Projects and Neo Power Universal FZ LLC. RDB Rasayan has been asked to call back Rs 31.60 crore, given as inter-corporate loan, from RDBRIL.

Bhartiya Global has been asked to call back ICDs of 12.5 crore invested with Nihita Financials Ltd, Sanjukta Vanijya P and Darshan Tradelink and all amounts transferred / paid out of IPO proceeds to its directors or the relatives of its directors and other related parties.

In the case of Tijaria Polypipes, Sebi said it had received a complaint in the matter of its IPO, alleging insider trading or illegal turnover was resulting in huge losses to retail investors. The regulator conducted investigation to examine the steep fall in price of the scrip on the first day of trading. Sebi found the manipulative conduct by certain persons/entities on the first day of trading in the scrip of Tijaria Polypipes resulted in substantial losses to genuine investors who purchased shares of the company on the first day of trading.

New Ipad Application :Business Standard's all new IPad App
Click here to download for free
Arrow Other Stories     
- Markets post worst May performace since 2006
- Kavveri Telecom Q4 net declines over 6%
- Wall Street opens flat on economy worries
- RIM to set up first BlackBerry innovation zone in India
- Rajaratnam bragged about sources of inside info: Gupta lawyers
  Read Business news in 
- India's no. 1 Property Site. Click here to know more
- Benefits Upto Rs. 2.36 Lakhs on the Fully Loaded TJet Petrol.
- Help a Child Achieve her. Click to know more
- "Discover The Power of One"
- Benefits Upto Rs. 2.36 Lakhs on the Fully Loaded TJet Petrol.
- Watch The Film Here. Click here to know more..
- Learn How One City is Running on FOOD SCRAPS.
- 1 billion in saving for Unilever without any tangles.
- A Brand New Server at a Price That Fits Your Budget. Click here
- One Partnership Endless Possibilities. Click here to know more
- Helping doctors detect diseases earlier, saving costs & extending lives.
- Which is the best plan for your daughter
- Check out the TRUE COLOURS of your Stocks, Now for FREE!
- One of the leading business schools in the world.Know More
- 2 Lac Apartments, 1 Lac House / Plots. Click here
Sorry, comments to this story are closed
Latest Messages
Posted by: SARITA
WE HAVE PURCHASED 3000 SHARES OF RDB RASAYAN ON LISTING DATE AND TILL DATE HOLDING THE SHARES, WE HAVE PURCHASED UNDER THE WRONG IMPRESSION OF COMPANY, BUT COMPANY HAS MISUED THE FUND AND WHOLE ISSUE IS LIKE SCAM, WHY NOT ASK THE PROMOTARS TOT AKE BACK THE SHARES, AS THEY HAVE FUNDS PARKED IN DEPOSIT ACCOUNT, AS PER SEBI ORDERL
Posted by: rbjaju
one client has purchased 3000 sharesof RDB RASAYAN on listing date, shall he ask for return of money , as the company has changed the money use policy, instead of industry, they have invested in INTERCORPORATE DEPOSIT. brijgopal
Posted by: saurov
good work by SEBI - this is what they are meant to be. It was evident for ppl who are associated with the equity market and primary market in more that these are all shaddy IPO's - SEBI should actlly take this is a step forward by pulling put the QIB's who invest in these IPO's - its an open secret why they invest.
BS POLL
UPA 2 has completed three years. How do you rate its performance?  Read the story
  Good
  Average
  Bad
Submit
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- NDA-led bandh turns violent in Bangalore
- Investors wary as Flipkart shows growth pangs
- Army chief slams BEML on Tatra, awards it Rs 1,500-cr deal
- India announces austerity measures, cuts non-plan spend
- Kingfisher Airlines Q4 loss more than trebles
 
 More  
Tax Shastra
  Now available at Special price
  Rs. 360/- Only

  Buy Now
Table for Two
  Now available at Special price
  Rs.280/- Only

  Buy Now
 
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter Portfolio Tracker
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring BS Books
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World | General News
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Contact Us