The proposed deep cuts in personal income tax rates seem most untimely, and possibly rash
Shankar Acharya / New Delhi Aug 27, 2009, 00:14 IST
Times are bad. Drought stalks the countryside. In much of rural India distress is high and rising as the worst monsoon in over 20 years leaves lands parched and crops withered and raises food prices much above the meagre resources of landless labour and small farmers. In urban India the fear of swine flu is spreading far and wide, long before infection rates attain expected peaks. In most states weak public health systems are struggling to face the mounting challenge. Only one thing is sure: the pandemic will get worse before it gets better. In politics, the country’s second most important national party, the BJP, continues on its astonishing path to self-destruction. Its best people are being marginalised or expelled while a coterie of narrow, visionless power-seekers grab the reins. The hopes of resurrecting a two-party system at the national level are fading fast. The industrial landscape remains roiled by the bitter feud between the Ambani brothers, which has also embroiled the government and the judiciary. In the capital, a minor storm blows a hole in the city’s new, showpiece airport terminal, not long after deadly collapses in parts of the vaunted metro system.
In these dog days of August the Union finance ministry has floated a new, draft Direct Taxes Code. The Code has much to commend it. But its timing is clearly off and it suffers from serious weaknesses. Much of it was conceived two years ago, when the macro-fiscal environment was far healthier. The economy was growing at 9 per cent a year. Direct tax collections were showing unprecedented buoyancy, which was the single most important factor contributing to the government’s successful fiscal consolidation between 2003/4 and 2007/8. In that context it may have been reasonable to dream of sharp reductions in effective tax rates, engineered through both reductions in nominal rates and redefinition of tax brackets.
But the macro-fiscal context has changed dramatically, for the worse, over the past two years. Economic growth (y-o-y) has slumped below 6 per cent in recent quarters. Industrial growth has been anaemic (until June). Corporate profits growth has levelled off from the soaring trajectory of past years. Wage and salary cuts have become commonplace in the organised sector (outside government). Unsurprisingly, direct tax collections dropped well below budget expectations in 2008/9 after the 30 per cent-plus increases of previous years. And direct tax collection data for the initial four months of 2009/10 show growth of only 3 to 4 per cent. The government’s combined fiscal deficit (including off-budget items) doubled in 2008/9 to 11 per cent of GDP and is budgeted to be of the same order in 2009/10. What’s more, drought-related expenditures and below-budget tax collections could well raise the deficit for the present year.
Against this background, the deep cuts in personal income tax rates proposed by the Code seem most untimely, and possibly rash. If the Code’s recommendations are enacted, everyone currently in the 20 per cent rate bracket will only have to pay 10 per cent and many of those in the 30 per cent slab (up to Rs 10 lakh per year) will also become liable for only 10 per cent tax! For all those in the bracket Rs 10-25 lakh, the applicable rate will drop from 30 to 20 per cent. Indian personal income tax rates will become among the lowest of major economies of the world. In short, the Code proposes an extraordinary bonanza for Indian income tax payers, especially for those who are better off. Neither the current fiscal situation nor any reasonable notion of equity justifies this huge giveaway. Nor is any credible evidence presented to suggest that at prevailing rates of taxation the rate cuts would trigger large improvements in compliance which might offset the massive revenue losses.
Incidentally, the remarkable paucity of criticism of this extraordinary income tax cut proposal may confirm the suspicions of those who believe that media commentators, as a class, allow self-interest to prevail over objective assessments. More charitably, commentators may have fallen into the trap of believing that all tax rate reductions constitute “reform”. As any self-respecting economist can tell you, the only area where such a general proposition may have some validity is in the domain of taxes on international trade.
There are some other significant problems with the draft Code. For example the proposal to levy a small, 0.25 per cent, wealth tax comes with a mind-boggling exemption of Rs 50 crore. So, if you own assessable wealth of “only” Rs 49 crore, you are exempt from wealth tax! This in a country where the World Bank estimates that three-quarters of the total population subsist on less than $2 per day, or approximately Rs 36,000 per year. Surely, a wealth tax exemption limit of Rs 10 crore would be generous enough?
On the corporate side, there is no good case for reducing the general rate of corporate tax below the top marginal rate for individuals, that is, 30 per cent. Indeed, there are sound arguments for equating the two. The proposed restructuring of the minimum alternate tax (MAT) has already drawn much justifiable criticism, which I need not repeat (no lack of criticism here!). The structure of dividend taxation remains broadly unchanged. In other words, dividends distributed by a company attract a 15 per cent tax at the company stage, while in the hands of recipients the dividends are tax-free. This means the present glaring anomaly continues, whereby super-rich, family owners of companies bear the same rate of effective dividend tax as the proverbial, poor widow with a few shares. There are some obvious solutions to this anomaly, which do not seem to have found favour with the framers of this draft Code.
The draft Code proposes to overhaul the taxation of capital gains. The distinction between short-term and long-term capital gains will be abolished. All capital gains (subject to indexing of costs) are to be taxed at the regular rate applicable to the individual or company. The proposal is appealing in its simplicity and completeness. The one big doubt I have is how negatively will this affect the mobilisation of risk capital in the Indian economy? That was the major argument underpinning the exemption accorded a few years ago to long-term capital gains from equity transactions (and the associated concessional rate for short-term capital gains). That exemption may have taken the pendulum to one extreme. My concern is that the present proposal now swings to the opposite pole. A better scheme for taxing capital gains may lie between these two extremes.
Let’s hope the final Code eliminates all these weaknesses.
The author is Honorary Professor at ICRIER and former Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India. Views expressed are personal
The author may also consider the wide powers being given to already a hugely corrupt bureacracy within the tax department. Under the guise of GAAR (Genral Anti Avoidance Rules) discretionary powers are proposed to be given to the tax authorities which will be suitably misused to yield pressure and generate more undisclosed incomes for the tax personnel. Alongwith the rationalisation of the tax rates proposed, which one would tend to agree with, a rationalisation of powers being granted also needs to be there. Further, there should be some bit of accountability within the tax department too. For years, we have lived with tax department having wide powers and authorities without being accountable for their deeds. Do consider this as well.
Regards
This govt in the past has never bothered to comply with fiscal prudence. The churn in tax code can be seen as fiscal stimuli and to woe the voter for the next term including the near term assembly elections in various states. On the contrary the Planning commissioner has already maintained that no more fiscal stimuli is required and economy will return to growth path on its own as it is visible.
Futher such amendment will result into increase in disposable income of those who already possesses enough, pushing the inflation and making it increasingly difficult for the 3/4 (Don't even fall in tax bracket) population to access essential commodities.
I think the UPA govt's tax code draft has correctly been brought out timing wise.Mr Acharya wants more taxes from the aam admi in bad times!Strange, after correctly stating that India/Indians are reeling this year!Historically our present tax laws have origins in British times when tax revenue had to be sent to London& if it impoverished India, bad luck,as the Raj cost money&the natives had to be grateful'..of the white man's burden..'to lift them out of their heathen ways.The FM has started a dialogue with India& even asked us to respond by email.Good.The sore point is the EEE regime being changed to EET for PF/PPF/NPS/RETIREMENT BENEFITS. Does the govt. NEED TO benefit by taxing senior citizens/widows in their twilight years?? This draft tax code is for the benefit of Bharatwasis& to enlargen the base of the tax paying India in a fair manner.Fine tuning is the need of the hour.
Dear Sir,
You have rightly said that the new tax code hugely favours the rich over the poor. Politically speaking the aim of the new tax code it to please the middle class and the business class which seems to be favouring the opposition party.
Also, as you have said there is no data to suggest that tax reduction will improve compliance. Conversely it will not be difficult to prove that most of the evasion occurs in the top bracket for which no changes have been proposed.
Dr. Shankar Acharya has perhaps knowingly not touched the issue of taxing the providend fund, retirement benefits etc. at the time of withdrawal by a tax payer (salary earner). Depending upon the tax rate it will be taxed and after taxing what will be the amount in the hands of the tax payer and what will be the purchasing power of money left in his hands. The savings in PF or through other means used to be a forced saving just to avoid the tax liability and the Government used the money through EPFO. I am of the view that the source of funds to EPFO will dry up. It needs to be impressed upon by Dr. Acharya.
What's your 1st paragraph has to do with the rest of the article. Are you trying to say that our govt is that incapable that it should not be trying to do multi-tasking. What does the finance ministry has to do with Swine Flu? We have a health dept for that. What does the finance ministry has to do with drought? We have agricultural dept to deal with that. There is a reason why work is divided between different departments.
Content Guide
