Business Standard
Sunday, Jul 05, 2009
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
Feedback | RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
||||Economy & Policy||||| 
 Section Home | News Now | Today's Paper | Features & Analysis | Politics & Public Affairs | Q&A | Columnists | BS Says
Home > Economy & Policy Live Markets | Smart Portfolios
  Search:

Ship-breaking industry gets tax relief from SC
Anindita Dey & Nevin John / Mumbai December 05, 2008, 1:00 IST

The ship-breaking industry can now claim heavy deductions from their taxable income following a recent Supreme Court order.

 
 
News Now
Paper
Specials
- Budget hopes boost Sensex
- New Cos Bill to be more clear on role of independent directors
- CPI(M) leader expresses scepticism over several rail projects
- Reservation in pvt sector no answer for the future: Khurshid
- Satyam: Govt moves application in CLB to recall nominated directors
- Wheat futures rise after govt lifts export ban
More  

The Supreme Court, in its order in a case involving Vijay Ship Breaking Corporation, has stated that ship-breaking activity tantamounts to production and not a recycling process.

Following this clarification, the industry could ask for deductions from taxable income under Sections 80-I and 80-HH of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961.

Under these sections, an assessee can claim deduction from the gross total income up to 20 per cent of profits and gains if these products and gains are derived from an industrial undertaking or a ship or business of hotel or repairs to ocean-going vessels.

The litigation related to whether the ship-breaking industry produces anything new and distinct, which is one of the conditions for claiming such deduction under Section 80-HH. The Income-tax Department rejected the claim of the assessee for deductions as an industrial undertaking, stating that ship-breaking activity does not produce new article.

The Supreme Court, however, is of the view that production has a much wider connotation and it includes all byproducts, intermediate products and residual products that emerge in the course of manufacturing, and thus it does not only mean production of new article.

“With this order, the ship-breaking industry could get rid of the past liabilities of around Rs 50 crore that include tax, interest on tax and penalty,” said an industry expert.

It could be mentioned that in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs N C Budhiraja and Company in 2002, the Gujarat High Court had held that the articles that emerged from ship-breaking activity continued to be part of the ship and such parts did not constitute new goods.

storypagge
Arrow Other Stories     
- Budget hopes boost Sensex
- Wheat futures rise after govt lifts export ban
- 50,000 in south China evacuated after rains causes floods
- Orders on lie detection plea on July 9
- BSP to launch state-wide protest against fuel price hike
- Centre has failed to tackle naxalite problem: BJP
  Read Business news in 
  The most passionate motoring online website for motoring enthusiasts
  Smart IT Strategies for Uncertain Times
  Renew Your Car Insurance with Tata-AIG AutoSecure
  Choose smart affordable IT solutions and meet customer expectations
  Required : Sales executive at Bangalore, Click here to apply
  Unique Maritime Investment opportunity - U.S. based Group dealing in piracy protection force
  Download the E-book on the Future of Business Intelligence
  Learn Best Practices for improving customer satisfaction
  Know your customers better... download the free e-book on CRM
   Discussion Board / User Comments  (2)  
Display Name  Email-Id  
Post your comment
ashokaggarwalfca
Good for Industry It is unfortunate in our country to define different definitions under different acts for same words. Ship breaking can be linked to processing and not production which involves no doubt labour element It depends on interpretation and emphsis put by the defending lawyer on convincing of judges but I do not agree personally that ship breaking into scrap tantamounts to production. Means production of scrap Very funny.
Reply
  Reply by Ashok:
Law is what is interpreted before the Judges. Is this justified ?
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- RNRL moves SC to restrain RIL from supplying gas
- M Madhavan Nambiar to be new secretary, civil aviation
- Mirae biggest buyer in DHFL issue
- Beijing Auto submitted offer for Opel, says GM
- Freight corridors not on slow track
 
 More  


BS Poll
Cast Your Vote
 
   
 
Are you happy with the Railway Budget?
  Yes  No
Submit

  Hot Searches  
 
Manmohan Singh  |  Pranab Mukherjee |  Sonia Gandhi |  Rahul Gandhi | L K Advani | Congress | Meenakshi Natarajan | Maruti Ritz | LTTE |  Ranbaxy | DMK | Swine Flu |  New Pension Scheme |  Q4 Results |  Tata Nano |  Service tax |  Excise duty |  Sebi | Tech Mahindra |  Election Commission |  Ramalinga Raju |  CitiBank  |  Satyam |  Maytas  |  Reliance |  RBI |  GDP |  Gold |  Ratan Tata |  Bailout plan | ICICI |  Mumbai Terror Attack |  6th Pay Commission |  B-School | Mukesh Ambani | DLF  Sensex | Tax calculator |  Anil Ambani |  Infosys | Home Loan  | Bollywood | Subprime Crisis | Personal Finance |  inflation | oil prices |  World Bank | TCS |  HDFC |  Barack Obama  
 
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring
FOR HOT PRODUCTS
BS Bazaar.com
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Site Map | Contact Us