Business Standard
Sunday, Nov 22, 2009
 
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
Feedback | RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
  Home  ||||||||| 
 BS Headlines | News Now | BS Weekend | The strategist | The Smart Investor | Lunch with BS | Columnists | BS 1000
  Hindi | E-Paper | Motoring  | Live Markets |  Smart Portfolios II  | Blogs | Portfolios >
  Search:

Sunil Jain: Time to go, Mr Sreedharan
It is impossible to replicate the Delhi Metro model
Sunil Jain / New Delhi July 20, 2009, 0:04 IST

 
 
Related Stories
News Now
-Weak pillars
-CAG pulls up Delhi Metro
-Newsmaker: Elattuvalapil Sreedharan
-DMRC sends back project director
-A K Bhattacharya: The Metro Man's two mistakes
-Sreedharan orders quality check

Till even a few days ago, if you took a poll, despite the recent string of disasters in the Delhi Metro’s construction, most Delhi-ites would want Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) chief E Sreedharan to stay on. Accidents happen in all big projects, the argument goes, but Sreedharan is one of the few people who accepted moral responsibility, he has always delivered on time, he’s honest, he had to speed up things to meet the Commonwealth Games’ deadline, and so on. So much so that India’s crown prince Rahul Gandhi called him up to say, “Please don’t quit, we are all behind you.” This view of him being indispensable is shared by Sreedharan who, all along, has opposed private sector metros and has recommended his model be replicated — in cities like Kolkata and Chennai, DMRC is even the prime consultant in projects which, like the DMRC, are 50:50 partnerships between the state and central governments. Others have recommended the model be extended to other infrastructure projects.

These worthies would do well to read the Comptroller and Auditor General’s stunning indictment of how DMRC is run (http://www.cag.gov.in/html/reports/commercial/2008_PA17com/contents.htm). For one, it points to the novel 50:50 management structure to mean that neither of the governments is in charge, so the company is pretty much run by the management, namely Sreedharan. The company’s board doesn’t even have the token independent director. There appears no standard procedure for evaluating contracts and several changes have taken place in contracts after they have been won. The CAG talks of testing standards being watered down to meet deadline, of tests being conducted in non-accredited laboratories, of these being done without DMRC staffers being present, and so on. To top it all, DMRC hasn’t kept any records of test reports since it ‘would involve additional expenditure’!

Apart from what it tells you about how arrogant DMRC has become, it points to the impossibility of the Sreedharan model being replicable anywhere. For one, how do you see any politician-bureaucrat ceding all powers to someone else, and not changing the head for over 14 years — the NHAI, by way of contrast, has had three chairmen in three years. It is to the credit of Sreedharan’s integrity that no allegations of corruption have been levelled against DMRC — but how do you ensure that the heads of his 50:50 JV model will be as honest as he and shouldn’t there be some public oversight when the Rs 10,600 crore spent on the project is all public money?

Interestingly, when Sreedharan and others talk of the Delhi Metro’s success, vis-à-vis the Bus Rapid Transport corridor for instance, none talk of the huge concessions given to it by the government. Sreedharan was quick to shoot off a letter when the Hyderabad Metro project was given land for development and said the model could ‘lead to a big political scandal’. Well, DMRC’s loan base of Rs 6,648 crore, for instance, is highly subsidised by the Government of India and no dividend has been paid on the government equity of Rs 3,702 crore either — this alone implies an annual subsidy of more than Rs 1,000 crore (read http://www.business-standard.com/336473/ for a fuller explanation). Another Rs 240 crore a year or thereabouts comes from the various tax concessions given to it. And while the Hyderabad Metro got 269 acres of land, DMRC has got several times this. Indeed, DMRC is not even willing to pay Rs 452 crore of property tax that the Municipal Corporation of Delhi has levied on it, citing the chief secretary of Delhi’s decision saying it would not be levied. Had the BRT project been given even a fraction of the autonomy Sreedharan has been given, and an even tinier subsidy (if the Metro has 10 lakh users, that’s an annual subsidy of Rs 12,400 per passenger), there is little doubt it would have revolutionised Delhi’s traffic.

So the next time someone asks ‘after Sreedharan who’, let’s understand that his model is not replicable. More important, it is not desirable. If you want private sector efficiency and accountability, which is what the Sreedharan model was supposed to achieve, why not let the private sector do it? Like all other models, the private sector will perform only under strict supervision — in DMRC’s case, however, the 50:50 model ensures that, apart from Sreedharan, no one is keeping tabs on a Rs 10,600 crore project built from public money. And even he is not infallible.

Arrow Other Stories     
- Sensex makes remarkable recovery, regains 17K
- S C Kalia takes over as Union Bank ED
- PNB may acquire majority stake in Kazakh bank
- Maoist hindering land acquisition for Tata steel project: Raman
- Koda says he will report to ED only after Jharkhand polls
More  
  Read Business news in 
  Get financial advisory and solutions for your projects
  Holidays starting at a delightful EMI of Rs 3481
  Switch on and say hello to Monday morning !
  Your dream home can now be a reality.
  Visit Fortis for a preventive health check-up & get a 20% discount.
  Follow the ups and downs of your investments. Try our new Portfolio Tracker
  Kolkata Dock \ Freight contract for the British Gurkhas Nepal
  Find how Midsize Businesses use ERP to gain competitive advantage
  Trading in Forex is now as easy as 1-2-3
  Discover an economical and cost effective way to market your products and services
  Giftwithlove.com: Same day delivery of Flowers and Cakes to India
  Download the E-book on the Future of Business Intelligence
  Learn Best Practices for improving customer satisfaction
  Know your customers better... download the free e-book on CRM
   Discussion Board / User Comments    
Display Name  Email-Id  
Post your comment
sanjay
You have valid point regarding replicability of DMRC model. However this is not the reason for sreedharan to go. CAG report comments pale in background of the amount of work which DMRC has done under the leadership of Sreedharan. Its rarely we get good honest people with execution capabilities..let them complete their job till commonwealth games...after that organisation could have a new leader chosen in any manner which government feels ...but atleast by then Delhi would have got a Metro network. 50:50 JV is a ingenuity as it means neither state or center politicians can interfere. There is another example which you should study Power Trading Corporation which is promoted by Power PSUs but no one controls it..the organisation has grown with IPOs, QIPs etc..
Reply
Prashant
It is easy to criticize.....but prove otherwise.I can vouch Sreedharan is indepensable now when it comes to Delhi Metro....if you have the guts, prove me otherwise.....All these 14 years critics were sleeping including you Sunil. Like a typical indian, when there is a problem you make hell out of it.......
Reply
ashok
Shades of Dr. Kurien here. No individual should be allowed to overshadow the institution he works for so completely. A little sunshine and fresh air are needed in the DMRC.
Reply
a
The article is trying to defame Sreedharan who worked tirelessly for DMRC.The private sector would charge a much higher price for poor quality service. The CEO of private company would be eulogised by the financial press for looting the company like Raju(Satyam).Private sector in India is useless ,doesnot create jobs and amasses wealth for itself, focusing entirely on stock market valuation. Mr. Jain, please spare us the torture of reading your half baked slanderous and unresearched articles. Compare the price of trains in UK and India and then talk about efficiency. Please dont talk about C &AG because they dont have expertise to judge professional organisations.
Reply
Cholas
Sreedharan showed results not gigantic promises of private sector,
Reply
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- Kurbaan could be Karan Johar's first flop
- A golden lining seen in silver prices
- Ambani Jr, Brad Pitt join hands for sci-fi film
- HAL to invest Rs 25,000 cr in next 10 years
- We are not trying for a monopoly: HAL chairman
 
 More  
BS Poll
Cast Your Vote
 
   
 
Should India's defence sector be thrown open to foreign investments?
  Yes  No
Submit

  Hot Searches  
 
Amitabh Bachchan | N Chandrasekaran | Swine Flu | Mukesh Ambani | Anil Ambani | TCS | Infosys |  Air India |  Duronto |  Pranab Mukherjee | Sonia Gandhi | Congress | Rahul Gandhi |  Bigg Boss |  New Pension Scheme |  Service tax |  Excise duty |  Sebi | Tech Mahindra |  Ramalinga Raju |  Satyam |  Reliance  |  RBI |  GDP |  Gold |  Ratan Tata |  ICICI |  |  B-School | DLF  Sensex |  Tax calculator | Home Loan  | Bollywood | Personal Finance |  inflation | oil prices |  World Bank | Reliance Infratel |  HDFC |  Barack Obama  
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter Portfolio Tracker
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring
FOR HOT PRODUCTS
BS Bazaar.com
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Site Map | Contact Us | Feedback