Business Standard
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009
 
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
Feedback | RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
  Home  |Markets & Investing|Companies & Industry|Banking & Finance|Economy & Policy|Opinion|Life & Leisure|Mgmt & Mktg|Tech World|BS Products 
 BS Headlines | News Now | BS Weekend | The strategist | The Smart Investor | Lunch with BS | Columnists | BS 1000
  Hindi | E-Paper | Motoring  | Live Markets |  Smart Portfolios II  | Blogs | Portfolios >
  Search:
Sunita Narain: Climate science and the Indian scientist
DOWN TO EARTH
Sunita Narain / New Delhi July 31, 2007
Will Indian scientists’ measure up to the challenge of climate change? I ask this because of the nature of the science as well as the nature of our scientists.
 
Climate change science is young, being tutored and is evolving. We know much more today about what the future will hold if we do not reduce emissions drastically. Yet, our knowledge is still probabilistic. It concerns changes that we can model for climate sensitivity, using the best evidence we have today to see the changes we can predict for tomorrow. But all models are victims of their assumptions. And all predictions are villains of their times. The challenge is we can’t afford to be uncertain in our actions, even if we are uncertain about our science.
 
Take glaciers. We know that glaciers melt. But the question is if glaciers are melting at an unnatural pace; if this melting will lead to more water in our rivers to begin with leading to floods and then less, creating scarcity. The answer after much scientific skulduggery is just beginning to crystallise. We know glaciers are receding fast because science can physically map the glaciers to see the pace of the recession. But there are huge uncertainties regarding the critical thresholds of collapse, say, of the Antarctic ice sheet.
 
In India, we are just beginning to map impacts on our glaciers because of human induced climate change. The question is can we do this? I ask this because it is not in the nature of our science to do this kind of imaginative and investigative research. It is certainly not in the manner of our science to draw inferences, when there is uncertainty. In the easiest of times, our scientists find it against their nature to cross over the line from what is already established science to what is emerging science. They prefer to play safe with what they know. In the case of climate science, they would prefer to be cautious in their words, very conservative in their assessment and take refuge in the inherent uncertainty of science.
 
For instance, it will be easy for ‘safe’ science to say that even if glaciers are receding at a rapid pace, it is nothing new or surprising. They are simply passing through a phase of recession as a natural cyclic process. It will also possible to say (and I have heard this said very recently) that even if we know glaciers are melting, there is no evidence to say that this melt will lead to any significant changes in our hydrological systems. Why? Because our ongoing research does not show anything deviant. It is another matter that the data or method used for the research may be insufficient. Or that the scientist may not have investigated the slim leads that nature was disclosing about herself.
 
Let’s accept that there is a problem. The Indian scientific establishment has been for far too long just that — an establishment. Worse, because of the nature of its institutions — which are closed to outsiders on the one hand, but subservient to officialdom on the other hand — it will not engage in any public discourse.
 
But climate science demands new approaches. It demands breaking away from what is already known to discover what needs to be known and how. It will require crossing the line so that inferences can be drawn, however tentative. It will require, most of all, active engagement with the ‘outside’ world of ordinary people and everyday events to listen and to observe science as it plays in our gardens, in our agricultural fields and in our glaciers.
 
Finally, if I can say (without offence) that Indian science, to respond to climate change, will have to get a little less male and perhaps even a little less old. ‘Male’ science (if we can allow for some generalisation) is not interested in soft issues like the environment or nature. These are non-issues in a world of nuclear, space or rocket technologies. Why young? Because science (and the world) needs all their impatience and their desperation.

 
 
Arrow Other Stories     
- Sensex makes remarkable recovery, regains 17K
- Bharati to go by Sebi norms on Great Offshore offer
- Galleon exits Edelweiss; sells 7% stake for Rs 255.54 cr
- Suzlon Energy's three promoters pledge 2.8 cr shares
- Draw export strategy of $300 bn: Assocham to govt
More  
  Read Business news in 
Advertisements
  Get financial advisory and solutions for your projects
  Holidays starting at a delightful EMI of Rs 3481
  Switch on and say hello to Monday morning !
  Your dream home can now be a reality.
  Visit Fortis for a preventive health check-up & get a 20% discount.
  Follow the ups and downs of your investments. Try our new Portfolio Tracker
  Kolkata Dock \ Freight contract for the British Gurkhas Nepal
  Find how Midsize Businesses use ERP to gain competitive advantage
  Trading in Forex is now as easy as 1-2-3
  Discover an economical and cost effective way to market your products and services
  Giftwithlove.com: Same day delivery of Flowers and Cakes to India
  Download the E-book on the Future of Business Intelligence
  Learn Best Practices for improving customer satisfaction
  Know your customers better... download the free e-book on CRM
   Discussion Board / User Comments    
Display Name  Email-Id  
Post your comment
Dr.S.ANANDKUMAR January 06 , 2009 ,14:22 IST
There are male gynecologists and female surgeons for men. Pushing feminism is dangerous for Indian science. A woman scientist goes on maternity leave for three months, which is right as per rules, come what may to climate in India. Does it mean to say woman scientists are not hard on issues on environment or nature? Higher standards of merit and rigorous performance appraisal are paramount to nurture science in India, and recruiting impatient, desperate youngsters and women are not the answers.
Reply
ajithsrn July 31 , 2007 ,08:27 IST
Ms Narain, we should also try to avoid the all prevalent temptation of forcing gender issues into the green movement, at least. Any movement which consider some other person/ concept as their enemy can never be truly successful.
Reply
ajithsrn July 31 , 2007 ,08:21 IST
http://green.yahoo.com/index.php?q=node/14
Reply
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- Bharti Airtel slashes roaming rates by 60%
- Govt may allow private sector investment in education
- We are not trying for a monopoly: HAL chairman
- Patni may host all IT services on 'cloud'
- Bank stocks rise on merger talk
 
 More  
BS Poll
Cast Your Vote
 
   
 
Should rich charitable trusts be brought under the tax net?
  Yes  No
Submit

  Hot Searches  
 
Amitabh Bachchan | N Chandrasekaran | Swine Flu | Mukesh Ambani | Anil Ambani | TCS | Infosys |  Air India |  Duronto |  Pranab Mukherjee | Sonia Gandhi | Congress | Rahul Gandhi |  Bigg Boss |  New Pension Scheme |  Service tax |  Excise duty |  Sebi | Tech Mahindra |  Ramalinga Raju |  Satyam |  Reliance  |  RBI |  GDP |  Gold |  Ratan Tata |  ICICI |  |  B-School | DLF  Sensex |  Tax calculator | Home Loan  | Bollywood | Personal Finance |  inflation | oil prices |  World Bank | Reliance Infratel |  HDFC |  Barack Obama  
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter Portfolio Tracker
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring
FOR HOT PRODUCTS
BS Bazaar.com
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Site Map | Contact Us | Feedback