Business Standard
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009
 
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
Feedback | RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
  Home  |Markets & Investing|Companies & Industry|Banking & Finance|Economy & Policy|Opinion|Life & Leisure|Mgmt & Mktg|Tech World|BS Products 
 BS Headlines | News Now | BS Weekend | The strategist | The Smart Investor | Lunch with BS | Columnists | BS 1000
  Hindi | E-Paper | Motoring  | Live Markets |  Smart Portfolios II  | Blogs | Portfolios >
  Search:
T N Ninan: Above our weight
WEEKEND RUMINATIONS
T N Ninan / New Delhi February 02, 2008
Back in the early 1990s, China’s Deng Xiaoping spelt out, in 24 characters, what should be China’s foreign and military policy. Deng said: “Observe calmly; secure our position; cope with affairs calmly; hide our capacities and bide our time; be good at maintaining a low profile; and never claim leadership.” Later, another clause was added: “Make some contribution”. The core of Deng’s thought was that China should keep its head down, until its long-term power had been built up (“hide our capacities, bide our time”) — at which point, presumably, the country would assert itself. Some would argue that the time for assertion seems to have come, given how China has begun flexing its muscles. It has used a combination of financial leverage, diplomatic manoeuvring and military aid to grab natural resources all over Africa and in our neighbourhood, sometimes walking off with gas contracts even though Indian firms bid more. In the military sphere, it has undertaken a spectacular demonstration of its ability to launch and operate killer satellites in space — sending out a clear signal that has registered in Washington. And in the operation of its currency policy and sovereign wealth funds, it has demonstrated a “don’t care what you think” cockiness that tells its own story.
 
This careful sequencing of the accumulation of power before it is demonstrated in action, contrasts with India’s preferences and behaviour. Since Nehru’s days immediately after Independence, we have sought to box above our weight. For a time, it paid dividends (of a kind) — India figured as a peacemaker in some of the major international crisis-points, be it Korea or Cambodia. And of course it was a prime mover in creating the non-aligned movement, in pushing for de-colonisation, and such like. Interestingly, China has studiously stayed away from, or kept a low profile at, multilateral talk-shops — unlike some of our diplomats who see themselves as leaders in such forums because they can speak good English, and get pulled into drafting sessions because they can write good English. It did not dawn on us that, when it really counted (like the trade deals), we came away from the big GATT conferences with little to show. In reality, therefore, India made the noise while China enjoyed the substance of power — like a seat in the Security Council, and being counted as one of the nuclear haves.
 
By the 1970s, the world was getting tired of India’s hectoring and took less and less notice, even as the country seemed to be sinking into a morass of economic under-performance and political confusion, both signalling a lack of national direction. Slowly, the reality that we don’t count dawned on our leaders; so we stopped sounding off on all and sundry and began focusing on national interests. When the 1980s gave us some initial successes, we did Round 2 of premature posturing — remember the talk of a blue-water navy that could operate as far afield as Australia — only for the economic crisis of 1990-91 to give us another cold shower. Now, with some real economic success, the achievements of Indians overseas and serious international interest in the India story, our chests are out again in a fresh round of premature triumphalism. We threaten cricket walk-outs, claim to be a technological superpower though barely 2 per cent of the population uses the internet, and bracket ourselves with China economically though ours is only a third of China’s GDP.
 
Perhaps we have starved egos that are hungry for some external feeding. Perhaps it is merely that Indians are voluble and argumentative, while the Chinese are less “scrutable”. Whatever the explanation, it might be good idea to learn something from Deng and keep our heads down (and mouths shut) for a while longer.

 
 
Arrow Other Stories     
- Sensex makes remarkable recovery, regains 17K
- Bharati to go by Sebi norms on Great Offshore offer
- Galleon exits Edelweiss; sells 7% stake for Rs 255.54 cr
- Suzlon Energy's three promoters pledge 2.8 cr shares
- Draw export strategy of $300 bn: Assocham to govt
More  
  Read Business news in 
Advertisements
  Get financial advisory and solutions for your projects
  Holidays starting at a delightful EMI of Rs 3481
  Switch on and say hello to Monday morning !
  Your dream home can now be a reality.
  Visit Fortis for a preventive health check-up & get a 20% discount.
  Follow the ups and downs of your investments. Try our new Portfolio Tracker
  Kolkata Dock \ Freight contract for the British Gurkhas Nepal
  Find how Midsize Businesses use ERP to gain competitive advantage
  Trading in Forex is now as easy as 1-2-3
  Discover an economical and cost effective way to market your products and services
  Giftwithlove.com: Same day delivery of Flowers and Cakes to India
  Download the E-book on the Future of Business Intelligence
  Learn Best Practices for improving customer satisfaction
  Know your customers better... download the free e-book on CRM
   Discussion Board / User Comments    
Display Name  Email-Id  
Post your comment
bizboy February 04 , 2008 ,15:15 IST
At last someone has discovered that we are a nation of loudmouths. Why only the Chinese? Most great powers in history have demonstrated their power only when the time had come to do so. Not us. Therefore we suffered in 1962 for our vainful boasts. Isn't it common sense? The bully at school or the local goonda or money bag will fear most if you could match them like for like. So also in political economy. Speak softly but carry a big stick. RICH COUNTRY - STRONG NATION was the Jap modn. mantra.
Reply
hn1 February 04 , 2008 ,14:14 IST
But our leaders did preserve and nourish a democratic setup in the most diverse country in existance in the world. No doubt the Chinese display far a deeper understanding of realpolitik than any Indian government ever has. However, making India's grand political treatise, the Chanakya Niti, mandatory reading for any future Indian government is likely to draw howls of injured protest from mainly people like you, who are unsure of their heritage and look to the goras for every inspiration.
Reply
kumarrani2003 February 03 , 2008 ,22:40 IST
If economic growth is the only criterion to judge any nation, then the author is right but can we not judge Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru by other factors like the establishment of a great democracy and national integration for a country which was divided geographically/ politically for thousands of years? Please look at any democratic country established alongwith us and compare its progress. China is no comparison and we have to support the suppressed countries of the world, if need arises.
Reply
kishorejets February 02 , 2008 ,23:25 IST
The Congress still seems to have bhai bhai approach that Nehru had till his illusions were shattered by the Chinese invasion in 1963. India, in collaboration with USA, can keep China, a potentially dangerous country, in check. Somehow, India has chosen to be ambivalent about USA which can be detrimental to its own interests.
Reply
vvk61 February 02 , 2008 ,17:48 IST
Provoking article.I am in total agreement with the author view that Indai should take a leaf out from China's- Deng.Let our work speak rather than the unwanted noiseswe have been creating for long. Let recognition and respect come from true strengths instead of drawing it from imaginery beliefs and history.Our stock raise gradually based on real performance on the ground not from the reasearch papers,possible outcomes from Brics analysisetc.Hope the message is well received by all cocerned.
Reply
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- Bharti Airtel slashes roaming rates by 60%
- Govt may allow private sector investment in education
- We are not trying for a monopoly: HAL chairman
- Patni may host all IT services on 'cloud'
- Bank stocks rise on merger talk
 
 More  
BS Poll
Cast Your Vote
 
   
 
Should rich charitable trusts be brought under the tax net?
  Yes  No
Submit

  Hot Searches  
 
Amitabh Bachchan | N Chandrasekaran | Swine Flu | Mukesh Ambani | Anil Ambani | TCS | Infosys |  Air India |  Duronto |  Pranab Mukherjee | Sonia Gandhi | Congress | Rahul Gandhi |  Bigg Boss |  New Pension Scheme |  Service tax |  Excise duty |  Sebi | Tech Mahindra |  Ramalinga Raju |  Satyam |  Reliance  |  RBI |  GDP |  Gold |  Ratan Tata |  ICICI |  |  B-School | DLF  Sensex |  Tax calculator | Home Loan  | Bollywood | Personal Finance |  inflation | oil prices |  World Bank | Reliance Infratel |  HDFC |  Barack Obama  
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter Portfolio Tracker
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring
FOR HOT PRODUCTS
BS Bazaar.com
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Site Map | Contact Us | Feedback