You are here: Home » Companies » News
Business Standard

Anil Ambani companies' stand is an 'attempt to mislead, smacks deceit': HC

In its initial observations, court finds fault in arguments made against Edelweiss companies for the sale of pledged shares

Jash Kriplani  |  Mumbai 

anil ambani
Reliance Group Chairman Anil Ambani | Photo: PTI

The Anil Ambani group companies’ initial arguments in the Bombay High Court (HC) alleging misconduct on the part of Edelweiss group in the sale of pledged shares and seeking compensation for the same have not gone down well. After hearing both sides, the court has described the Reliance group companies’ stand as smacking of deceit and an attempt to mislead. The court is yet to give its final judgment and has deemed its views as “prima facie”.

On the Anil Ambani group firms’ arguments that they had not been given adequate notice before the pledged shares were sold, the court observed: “It is rather strange that such an argument is made by plaintiffs. When the contract was entered into, plaintiffs found one business day notice to be reasonable… Therefore, stand of plaintiffs’ smacks of deceit. Plaintiffs’ attempt is to mislead. At no point after occurrence of events of default, did plaintiffs… ask for increasing the notice period,” the court said.

ALSO READ: SC holds Anil Ambani guilty of contempt, orders RCom to clear Ericsson dues

The court added: “Plaintiffs don’t pay default interest, don’t top up the security ratio, don’t even tell defendants how they are going to make good or even reply to letters from plaintiffs, and now take a mendacious stand that notice period in the contract was not reasonable.”

The court also gave the view that there was no case of “fiduciary obligations” being breached by Edelweiss group in selling the pledged shares. It asked Aspi Chinoy, counsel for the Reliance group companies, “… what is the breach of contract or which are the provisions of the agreements that plaintiffs are alleging defendants committed to breach?”

“I find nothing wrong in what defendants did,” Justice K R Shriram, who presided over the proceedings, said.

ALSO READ: RCom asks lenders to allow release of Rs 260 crore directly to Ericsson

Denying any interim relief, Justice K R Shriram said, “…defendants cannot be stopped from exercising their rights under the contract and applicable law.”


The court observed that as plaintiffs have not yet proved that the damages suffered by them, “this cannot be a reason for stopping defendants from taking further action on the pledged shares.”

ALSO READ: How Anil Ambani could arrange funds needed to comply with the SC order

On February 8, the Anil Ambani group said, “Illegal, motivated, and wholly unjustified action” by Edelweiss group and L&T Finance precipitated a fall of Rs 13,000 crore, an unprecedented 55 per cent, in market capitalisation of the group in a short span of four days, causing substantial losses to its shareholders.

The Anil Ambani group companies subsequently filed a petition against Edelweiss companies in the Bombay HC.

On the allegation that selling of pledged shares was an attempt to bring down the stock price of the companies and purchase shares at lower price, the Edelweiss group companies’ counsels said they would submit details of every sale price and how the amount realised has been applied.

First Published: Thu, February 21 2019. 13:15 IST