SOUTH EAST AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED
ANNUAL REPORT 2007-2008
The Members of
South East Agro Industries Limited
We have audited the Annexed Balance Sheet of M/s. SOUTH EAST AGRO
INDUSTRIES LIMITED, New Delhi, as on 31st March 2008 and also profit & Loss
Account for the year ended on that date annexed thereto and the cash flow
statement for the year ended on that date. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing standards generally
accepted in India. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As required by the Companies (Auditor's Report) Order 2003, issued by the
Central Government of India in terms of sub-section (4A) of section 227 of
the Companies Act 1956, we enclose in the Annexure a statement of the
ratters specified in the paragraph 4 and 5 of the said order. Further to
our comments in the Annexure referred to above, we report that:
a) We have obtained all the information and explanations which to the best
of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purpose of our audit.
b) In our opinion, proper books, of account as required by law have been
kept by the company so far as it appears from our examination of those
c) The Balance Sheet and the Profit &Loss Account dealt by the report are
in agreement with the books of account.
d) In our opinion the Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Accounts comply with
the accounting standards referred to in section 211 (3c) of the Companies
e) On the basis of written representations received from the directors, as
on 31st March 2008, and taken on record by the Board of Directors, we
report that none of the directors is disqualified as on 31st March 2008
from being appointed as a director in terms of clause (g) of sub-section
(1) of Section 274 of the Companies Act, 1956.
f) In our opinion and to the best of our knowledge and according to the
explanations given to us, the said accounts give the information required
by the Companies Act, 1956, in the manner so required and gives a true and
fair view in conformity with the accounting principals generally accepted
(i) In the case of the Balance Sheet, of the state of affairs of the
Company as on 31st March 2008.
(ii) In the case of the Profit & Loss; Account, of the Loss of the Company
for the year ended on that date.
(iii) in the case of cash flow statement, of the cash flows for the year
ended on that date.
For N.K. Bhat & Associates
Dated: 25-06-2008 (N.K. Bhat)
Place: New Delhi Proprietor
Re: South East Agro Industries Limited
Annexure referred to in paragraph 3 of the Auditor's Report of even date.
1. The Company has maintained proper records of fixed assets showing full
particulars including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets on
the basis of information available. According to the information and
explanations given to us, the fixed assets have been physically verified by
the management during the year which in our opinion is reasonable having
regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. No material
discrepancies were noticed on such verification. None of the fixed assets
have been disposed off during the year.
2. As explained to us, inventories, have been physically verified by the
management at reasonable intervals during the year. In our opinion, the
frequency of such verification is reasonable having regard to the size of
the Company and the nature of its business.
3. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given
to us, the procedures of physical verification of inventories followed by
the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the
Company and the nature of the business.
4. The company has maintained proper records of inventory. As explained to
us, there were no material discrepancies noticed on physical verification
of stocks as compared to book records.
5. In company has not granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies,
firms or other parties listed in the register maintained u/s 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956, or to the companies under the same management within
meaning of Section 370 of the Companies Act, 1956.
6. The terms and conditions on which the company has taken loans from
companies, firms or other parties listed in the register maintained under
sub section (1B) of section 370 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) are
prima facie not prejudicial to the interest of the company.
7. In our opinion, and according to the information and explanation given
to us, there are adequate internal control procedures commensurate with the
size of the Company and the nature of its business for the purchase of Raw
Material, Stores & Spares and Fixed Assets and for the sale of goods. In
our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us,
there is no continuing failure to correct major weaknesses in internal
8. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given
to us, there were no transactions of purchase and sale of goods and
materials made in pursuance of contracts or arrangements entered in the
registers maintained u/s. 301 of the Companies act, 1956 and aggregating
during the year to Rs.5,00,000/- or more.
9. The company has not a accepted any deposited from the public in terms of
Section 58A of the Companies Act 1956.
10. In our opinion, the company has an internal audit system commensurate
with the size and nature of its business.
11. The Central Government has not prescribed maintenance of cost records
under section 209(1)(d) of the Companies Act 1956.
12. According to the records of the Company, Employees State Insurance Fund
have been deposited with appropriate authorities generally in time. We have
been informed that provisions of Provident Fund Act are not applicable to
13. According to the information and explanations given to us, there were
no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Sales tax, Income tax, Wealth
tax, Customs duty and excise duty, which have remained outstanding as at
31st March 2007 for a period of more than six months, from the date they
became payable, except those stated in the Notes on Accounts.
14. According to the information and explanations given to us, the company
was in default in repayment of Term Loan and interest on term loan not
provided. Please refer to note Nos. 4 & 5 in schedule -XIII
15. The company has not granted any loans and advances on the basis of
security by way of pledge of shares, debentures and other securities.
16. According to the information and explanations given to us, the company
has not given any guarantee for loans taken by others from banks or
17. The company has not taken any term loans during the year.
18. the company has not raised any funds on short term basis and applied
them for long term investments and vice versa.
19. According to the information and explanations given to us no
preferential allotment of shares has been made by the Company to parties
and companies covered in the Register maintained under section 301 of the
Companies Act, 1956.
20. According to the information and explanations given to us no fraud on
or by the company has been noticed or reported during the year.
For N.K. Bhat & Associates
Place: New Delhi (N.K. Bhat)
Dated: 25-06-2008 Proprietor