Proposed amendments allow authorities to take over or dispose of NGO assets if FCRA licences are suspended or cancelled
Successive amendments since 2010 have imposed stricter compliance norms, significantly constraining NGO operations
Vague definitions risk expanding discretionary powers, raising concerns over arbitrary action against civil society groups
Provisions to transfer NGO assets to the state and allow authorities to run activities raise questions on fairness and intent
Restrictions may hinder NGOs working in critical areas like health, education, and poverty alleviation
Effective oversight must avoid overreach, ensuring accountability without undermining legitimate civil society contributions