BS EDIT: Swift resolution required

By Business StandardPublished On Dec 24, 2025

Structural weakness

Adding NCLT courts and NCLAT Benches again spotlights a long-standing gap: insolvency adjudication expanded without matching capacity

Mismatch of mandate and capacity

NCLT was built for company law, then tasked with IBC cases without commensurate infrastructure, staff, or support systems

Delays are entrenched

IBBI data shows 8,659 CIRPs admitted by September; 1,898 ongoing. Average timelines far exceed the IBC’s 330-day outer limit

Why time matters

When resolution drags on, asset value erodes and recoveries weaken, undermining the IBC’s promise of a swift, predictable exit

Appeals need timelines

A select committee flagged no statutory timeline for NCLAT in proposed changes, urging disposal of appeals within three months

Fix execution, not design

IBC has improved recoveries and discipline, but credibility depends on capacity, tech-enabled case management, and finality of resolution plans