The draft suggests an automatic license for AI firms to use any lawfully accessed copyrighted work for training, with royalties paid upon commercialisation
No prior permission or opt-out for creators is required
A government-appointed body would collect and distribute royalties
A separate committee with experts would set rates, subject to judicial review, covering both organised and unorganised creator sectors
The model rejects dataset disclosure and creator opt-outs
Critics call it a "tax on innovation," while creators fear undervaluation and lack of control over their premium content's use
As a global outlier, this could deter international copyright holders from licensing content into India,
potentially limiting access to premium global content for education and consumers
The intent to prevent free-riding on creativity and ensure remuneration is sound
However, the method of forced licensing with state-set rates is seen as problematic and misaligned with global trends
An alternative: a legal framework protecting copyright with model contracts, enabling direct negotiations between AI firms and creators
This could balance remuneration with market flexibility and international pragmatism