It observed that the recorded conversation regarding the alleged bite and the Labrador's subsequent examination by the vets reflected versions different than the allegations of Bharti's wife Lipika Mitra.
"Perusal of the case diary, dated September 30, show that examination of dog Don by the board of the doctors of animal husbandry hospital was conducted and applicant (Bharti) was directed to give commands to Don, i.E., Don come, Don bark, Don bite...Don sit down etc. But dog Don did not respond on his commands," Additional Sessions Judge Anil Kumar said.
"This taking care of dog by the complainant was despite the fact, as alleged by her, that this dog assaulted her just one-two days before, on the command of applicant (Bharti)," the court said.
It further said "serious allegations made by the complainant are not in consonance with her recorded conversations with applicant. Recorded conversation on the point of dog bite and wrist slit reflect different versions".
Lipika has alleged that the AAP leader had unleashed his pet on her during pregnancy and even slit her wrist with a kitchen knife.
Based on these allegation, police had booked Bharti for attempt to murder charges under section 307 of IPC and other charges. Police had also examined Bharti's pet to ascertain the allegation after taking it into custody.
