The application sought details of MPLAD funds and their expenses during last five years on flood control measures. It was returned by the Irrigation department claiming that name of the payee was wrong on the fee submitted by the applicant.
"The Commission directs Rajesh Singh, Executive Engineer: Civil Division:IV to show cause as to why penalty u/s 20 should not be imposed upon him for not accepting the IPO in the name of the Accounts Officer despite clear instructions from DoPT. He is directed to submit his response so as to reach the Commission within three weeks of receipt of this order," Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu said in a stern order.
He also directed the PIO to ensure that while responding to the RTI application, the PIO should ensure that reference date is mentioned so that appellants do not find it difficult to link it to their RTI application.
"Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) has repeatedly reminded public-authorities to accept all payments under RTI Act made in 'Accounts Officer'. But difficulties are being faced by RTI petitioners because of public-authorities not complying with DoPT circulars," RTI applicant Subhash Agrawal said.
